• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trump's promised ICE raids have begun

Andy_Ross said:
U.S. Department of Justice
@TheJusticeDept
Leader of ANTIFA Cell Members in North Texas SENTENCED TO 100 YEARS IN PRISON for Terrorist Attack on ICE Facility: Seven additional defendants also sentenced before one-year anniversary of attack to a combined 450 years in prison

This is the first sentencing of defendants affiliated with Antifa following @POTUS’s executive order designating the group as a Domestic Terrorist Organization in September 2025.

"The sentences handed down today make clear that Antifa terrorists who attack law enforcement and federal facilities will face swift and uncompromising justice,” said Acting Attorney General @DAGToddBlanche. “Their violent extremism has no place in our country, and the Department of Justice will continue to aggressively investigate, disrupt, and prosecute those who threaten law enforcement officers or undermine the rule of law."

link
Click to expand...
*cough*January 6ers*cough*
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump

The men and women of ICE are doing a GREAT job, one that has to be done.
CRIME IS WAY DOWN IN AMERICA, in many cases with numbers that haven't been seen in decades.
The Open Border Policy of Sleepy Joe Biden allowed 25,000,000 people to pour into our Country, unchecked and unvetted. Many were Criminals, and we have to get them out.
In order to do this, we must be strong, tough, and smart, and we CANNOT give up one of I.C.E.'s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!
Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal's hands. The Radical Left Dumocrats would like to see this done, but it won't happen on my watch.

I.C.E., be judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.
Keep those Crime Stat Records coming!
Remember, you are loved and respected in America.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
 
Andy_Ross said:
Donald J. Trump
@realDonald Trump

The men and women of ICE are doing a GREAT job, one that has to be done.
CRIME IS WAY DOWN IN AMERICA, in many cases with numbers that haven't been seen in decades.
The Open Border Policy of Sleepy Joe Biden allowed 25,000,000 people to pour into our Country, unchecked and unvetted. Many were Criminals, and we have to get them out.
In order to do this, we must be strong, tough, and smart, and we CANNOT give up one of I.C.E.'s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!
Once we do, we are playing right into the criminal's hands. The Radical Left Dumocrats would like to see this done, but it won't happen on my watch.

I.C.E., be judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.
Keep those Crime Stat Records coming!
Remember, you are loved and respected in America.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP
Click to expand...
Yeah, great job. That's why they're stonewalling cooperation with local authorities.
 
Frank Newgent said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2076798878595342620

According to the following the above reads like an admission of murder.

www.justice.gov

1-16.000 - Department of Justice Policy On Use Of Force

www.justice.gov www.justice.gov
Click to expand...
I presume that this is the reason why the official report adds "fearing for public safety." That makes a nice "not solely" catchall for murdering anyone. He was driving a car, and he might have run over a child later in the day. So I "discharged my weapon" which just so happened to be aimed through the windshield at his head, thus saving innumerable children from potential harm. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
When is enough for these bloodthirsters; not just the ice and cbd mother ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊, but the cultists, the Definitely Not Trumper Trumpers and other I Got Miners?

I would suspect never is enough, and if they have to kill all of "them," so be it.
 
bruto said:
I presume that this is the reason why the official report adds "fearing for public safety." That makes a nice "not solely" catchall for murdering anyone. He was driving a car, and he might have run over a child later in the day. So I "discharged my weapon" which just so happened to be aimed through the windshield at his head, thus saving innumerable children from potential harm. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Click to expand...
What was the specific act that led the officer to discharge his weapon? That's an actual question here.

The Supreme Court has counseled that every use-of-force case involves a "totality-of-the-circumstances" inquiry. The Court has explained that the "totality of the circumstances" involves an appraisal of the "whole picture" and the "surrounding circumstances" leading up to the use of force—not a fact or factor "in isolation." A broader vantage point, the Court observed, is predicated on the notion that "the whole is often greater than the sum of its parts[.]‍" Accordingly, under the totality-of-the-circumstances methodology, a court is to "examine the events leading up to the arrest" from the "standpoint of an objectively reasonable police officer."

Beyond this general understanding of the totality-of-the-circumstances test, the Supreme Court has declined to adopt per se rules in the use-of-force context. For example, in a 2007 use-of-force decision, the Court applied the totality-of-the-circumstances approach in considering the reasonableness of an officer's use of his police cruiser to ram a fleeing suspect's car. The Court rejected the notion of "a magical on/off switch that triggers rigid preconditions whenever an officer's actions constitute 'deadly force,'" concluding that even though ramming the suspect's car "posed a high likelihood of serious injury or death" to the suspect, the maneuver was reasonable given the threat to innocent bystanders posed by the high-speed car chase. In addition, in 2017, the Court rejected a categorical rule that would permit an excessive force claim if an officer committed an independent Fourth Amendment violation that "provoke[d] a violent confrontation."

Within these general parameters, lower courts have taken different approaches to applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test in use-of-force cases. For example, some lower courts adopted a more fluid totality-of-the-circumstances approach, while many courts have embraced a factor-based and distinctive deadly-force standard. Courts have also diverged as to whether police conduct leading up to or provoking the need for force is relevant to this inquiry.

Most relevant here, in contrast to a totality-of-the-circumstances test with a wide aperture, some courts reviewing use of deadly force claims have limited their inquiry to the specific time frame when the officer believed that the use of such force was necessary, with the circumstances leading up to the use of force being irrelevant under this test. Pursuant to this "moment of danger" or "moment of threat" approach, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) has explained, "‍[t]he excessive force inquiry is confined to whether the officers or other persons were in danger at the moment of the threat that resulted in the officers' use of deadly force." "‍[T]he focus of the inquiry," the court added, "should be on the act that led the officer to discharge his weapon."

Click to expand...
 
Yeah, sure they will.

Texas will investigate ICE's fatal shooting of man in Houston, Governor says​

The US state of Texas will investigate the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo last week by federal immigration agents, Governor Greg Abbott has announced, as demands for answers grow.

The Texas Rangers, a state law enforcement agency, will work alongside federal officials "to get to the bottom of exactly what happened," Abbott told reporters on Wednesday.
Click to expand...
Translation: "We will help the feds cover this up."
 
Resume said:
If you don't shut your mouths we will kill you?
Click to expand...
Andy_Ross said:
Tom Homan: "It all go backs to the Dems ... there's still gonna be more bloodshed unless they shut their mouth and let ICE enforce the laws that they enacted."

video in link
Click to expand...
Since it seems X no longer will give us video, I can't tell, but who is the "they" that enacted the laws. It sounds from the quote above that he thinks ICE itself enacted its own laws. Of course in a sense they did, but we're not supposed to say that out loud, are we?
 
bruto said:
Since it seems X no longer will give us video, I can't tell, but who is the "they" that enacted the laws. It sounds from the quote above that he thinks ICE itself enacted its own laws. Of course in a sense they did, but we're not supposed to say that out loud, are we?
Click to expand...
He was talking about the dumocrats, but yeah, we know what he meant.
 
bruto said:
Since it seems X no longer will give us video, I can't tell, but who is the "they" that enacted the laws. It sounds from the quote above that he thinks ICE itself enacted its own laws. Of course in a sense they did, but we're not supposed to say that out loud, are we?
Click to expand...
The ellipsis makes it unclear, but I think the "they" he's referring to are the Dems who enacted the laws, and who will be responsible for any bloodshed that occurs if they don't stop criticizing the way ICE goes about enforcing them. Apparently, once a law is passed, the only people who can have anything to say about whether it's being properly enforced are the ones who enforce them.
 
shemp said:
Yeah, sure they will.

Texas will investigate ICE's fatal shooting of man in Houston, Governor says​


Translation: "We will help the feds cover this up."
Click to expand...
I think the Harris County DA wants to do his own real investigation, but I suspect will be relegated to the Thanksgiving kids table in terms state/federal investigations. That is, they won't give him nothin'.

ETA
https://www.texastribune.org/2026/0...estigate-ice-shooting-lorenzo-salgado-araujo/

Harris County prosecutor will investigate ICE shooting but cautions that feds control access to evidence​

District Attorney Sean Teare said he is in contact with prosecutors in Minnesota who are investigating the January shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents.
 
Last edited:
bruto said:
Since it seems X no longer will give us video, I can't tell, but who is the "they" that enacted the laws. It sounds from the quote above that he thinks ICE itself enacted its own laws. Of course in a sense they did, but we're not supposed to say that out loud, are we
Click to expand...

Maybe the important words are the ones that the X poster excised from his quote and that you didn't get to hear. This seems to be the source of his snippet which starts at about 1:47:

 
bruto said:
Since it seems X no longer will give us video, I can't tell, but who is the "they" that enacted the laws. It sounds from the quote above that he thinks ICE itself enacted its own laws. Of course in a sense they did, but we're not supposed to say that out loud, are we?
Click to expand...
No, for groups like SA-ICE, law does not, no it cannot exist. For if there is law there is constraint on them. No matter how corrupted it is, no matter how twisted in their favour it will give you a way to outsmart them, to defeat them. They want to have the ability to pick you up no matter how well you stay within what they say the rules are, no matter how loyal you are to the Fuhrer and send you to Room 101 or its equvalent.

Hence why every dictatorship (which always go far right no matter where they start from) very quickly sets up a secret police outside the permanent state, with no constraints, subject to no laws and answerable only to the ruler (at first).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom