Treasury Secretary Paulson Arrested

Do these people have any idea how much money $70 trillion is? The entire world's GNP is something like $40 trillion. If this money existed in dollars, the inflation would be absolutely staggering. People would be using dollars to apply their shoe polish. The Cayman Islands would have solid gold toilet seats just on the commissions from handling this money.

Another thing I noticed is that Paulson supposedly has sole signatory power on this Leo Wanta's money. If I'm Wanta, the LAST thing I do is give SOMEONE ELSE sole control of my $4.5 trillion.

I wish I knew what these CTists smoked. It must be some GOOD (rule8).
 
jhunter1163 said:
*snip* I wish I knew what these CTists smoked. It must be some GOOD (rule8).
Click to expand...
Let´s ask Killtown - rumours said that he has the best weed around.
jumpy.gif
 
jhunter1163 said:
Do these people have any idea how much money $70 trillion is? The entire world's GNP is something like $40 trillion. If this money existed in dollars...
Click to expand...
I'm thinking that maybe this is where a trillion in the UK is actually a billion here in the USA, correct?

Which makes all the difference, because NWO - I mean NOW - I believe the entire story!!!
 
ConspiRaider said:
I'm thinking that maybe this is where a trillion in the UK is actually a billion here in the USA, correct?

Which makes all the difference, because NWO - I mean NOW - I believe the entire story!!!
Click to expand...

No, it is a trillion. They claim to be able to make $192 billion a day off investing $4.5 trillion of it.

To answer a previous question, Wanta claims the only reason they left him alive was because he knew where all the money was and had all the access codes. He also claims, however, that they have been spending his money for the last 20 years. Consistency is not his forte.

You would think that a man with access to $70 trillion could afford an actual office with a phone and secretary and all. His "corporation" was set up for $50 in Virginia, and lists his lawyer's office as its headquarters.

It also owes $110 in fees...
 
ConspiRaider said:
I'm thinking that maybe this is where a trillion in the UK is actually a billion here in the USA, correct?

Which makes all the difference, because NWO - I mean NOW - I believe the entire story!!!
Click to expand...

I had totally forgotten that. Ok, that makes more (less) sense now.
 
JamesB said:
No, it is a trillion. They claim to be able to make $192 billion a day off investing $4.5 trillion of it.
Click to expand...
You're kidding me, right? Inflation much?
You would think that a man with access to $70 trillion could afford an actual office with a phone and secretary and all. His "corporation" was set up for $50 in Virginia, and lists his lawyer's office as its headquarters.
Click to expand...
I'm sure that the only reason my wife keeps me around is that I know the PIN number to the ATM card.
 
JamesB said:
No, it is a trillion. They claim to be able to make $192 billion a day off investing $4.5 trillion of it.

To answer a previous question, Wanta claims the only reason they left him alive was because he knew where all the money was and had all the access codes. He also claims, however, that they have been spending his money for the last 20 years. Consistency is not his forte.

You would think that a man with access to $70 trillion could afford an actual office with a phone and secretary and all. His "corporation" was set up for $50 in Virginia, and lists his lawyer's office as its headquarters.

It also owes $110 in fees...
Click to expand...
007 -

Okay. I started seeing giant figures like in this section quoted from their story and was just wondering...

// snip
This shows that the EU countries (a) never had any real confidence in their Collective Currency;
(b) accordingly stored national banknotes against the possibility of a crisis such as has arisen as
a consequence of the ransacking of funds by US office-holders, which is impacting the EU; and
(c) were in fact individually and collectively engaged in a fraudulent operation. Now that national banknotes are reappearing, the European Collective Currency is doomed. The notes cannot be removed from circulation, as the general public will take fright and the crisis will develop runaway legs. The European press is waffling 'as we speak' about the impact of the Collective Currency on the new EU Members, without having caught on to the fact that the Collective Currency is being undermined by at least three of the EU national governments, which now fear that the derivatives crisis will destroy the Collective Currency as well as the US dollar. The Federal Reserve System has debt obligations in excess of $1,000 trillion, with the derivatives overhang (deceitfully estimated at $370 trillion) believed to aggregate at least $1,140 trillion.
// snip

So the Federal Reserve System has debt obligations in excess of one quadrillion dollars, according to these folksies?
 
No, it is a trillion. They claim to be able to make $192 billion a day off investing $4.5 trillion of it.
Click to expand...
is it just me, or is that like a 1500% annual yeild? i want their stock broker

but why does someone with 70 trillion dollars needs to invest anything?


but honestly, i dont think these CTers have any concept of money, or numbers in general, they just gloss over it and throw out whatever sounds big, like steven jones saying the odds of 911 not being an inside job were 1 in a tetragillion, lol
 
I surfed a littlebit and even the former DOD Rummy said
the day before 9/11 that they miss 2.3 TRILLION:

CBS-News:

 
Oliver said:
I surfed a littlebit and even the former DOD Rummy said
the day before 9/11 that they miss 2.3 TRILLION:

CBS-News:
Click to expand...
yep, and thats an accrued loss over the course of year (i think since WW2)

but thats not really missing, they just dont know specifically where it went, they know it was spent, they just dont know what specifically it was spent on (they didnt save the reciepts)

and i think thats a high estimate based on double-booking a lot of the money

fro examply, the DoD gives the army 5 million, the army doesnt tell the DoD what they did with the money so the DoD lists 5 million unaccounted for

the army gives 3 million of the that tot he cor of engineers, then lists it as unaccoutned for, now 8 million is missing

the engineers use 2 million of that on a bridge project, but dont keep good logs, so now 10 million is missing, from 5 million to begin with, lol
 
The Almond said:
How very telling. When asked to provide outside proof and corroboration, the author/editors get defensive and claim that, because no outside corroboration exists, the story is being suppressed and is therefore true.
<snip>
Click to expand...

I thought that sounded familiar
<snip>
4. Does the source claim that "the establishment is trying to suppress this discovery?"
Such a claim does not provide any evidence that the "discovery" is really valid. You need to poke these with other questions to find out more.
<snip>
Click to expand...
Source
 
defaultdotxbe said:
yep, and thats an accrued loss over the course of year (i think since WW2)

but thats not really missing, they just dont know specifically where it went, they know it was spent, they just dont know what specifically it was spent on (they didnt save the reciepts)

and i think thats a high estimate based on double-booking a lot of the money

fro examply, the DoD gives the army 5 million, the army doesnt tell the DoD what they did with the money so the DoD lists 5 million unaccounted for

the army gives 3 million of the that tot he cor of engineers, then lists it as unaccoutned for, now 8 million is missing

the engineers use 2 million of that on a bridge project, but dont keep good logs, so now 10 million is missing, from 5 million to begin with, lol
Click to expand...

Holy Moly - so there is no juridical need to record all outlays
to be able to explain what happened with all the money?

I mean this would be 38,333,333,333 $ per year within the
last 60 years - and nobody noticed anything? :eye-poppi
 
A quote from the worldreports.org site:

4th January 2007: All details of the Paulson arrest scenario and the contents of the Diary coverage on this website, together with all the previous Wanta postings, are pre-approved by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., Treasurer and Executive Vice President, AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, and by Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta. We will not be responding to further emails on this subject. When we have been briefed and have prepared any further posting, and have obtained written approval, we will post.
Click to expand...

TAM
 
Charges Sought Against Rumsfeld Over Prison Abuse
A lawsuit in Germany will seek a criminal prosecution of the outgoing Defense Secretary and other U.S. officials for their alleged role in abuses at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo; By ADAM ZAGORIN; Posted Friday, Nov. 10, 2006; Time Magazine

Just days after his resignation, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is about to face more repercussions for his involvement in the troubled wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. New legal documents, to be filed next week with Germany's top prosecutor, will seek a criminal investigation and prosecution of Rumsfeld, along with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, former CIA director George Tenet and other senior U.S. civilian and military officers, for their alleged roles in abuses committed at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The plaintiffs in the case include 11 Iraqis who were prisoners at Abu Ghraib, as well as Mohammad al-Qahtani, a Saudi held at Guantanamo, whom the U.S. has identified as the so-called "20th hijacker" and a would-be participant in the 9/11 hijackings. As TIME first reported in June 2005, Qahtani underwent a "special interrogation plan," personally approved by Rumsfeld, which the U.S. says produced valuable intelligence. But to obtain it, according to the log of his interrogation and government reports, Qahtani was subjected to forced nudity, sexual humiliation, religious humiliation, prolonged stress positions, sleep deprivation and other controversial interrogation techniques.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs say that one of the witnesses who will testify on their behalf is former Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, the one-time commander of all U.S. military prisons in Iraq. Karpinski — who the lawyers say will be in Germany next week to publicly address her accusations in the case — has issued a written statement to accompany the legal filing, which says, in part: "It was clear the knowledge and responsibility [for what happened at Abu Ghraib] goes all the way to the top of the chain of command to the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ."
Click to expand...
Karpinski may be trying to get even or clear her name, depending on if you think she was legitimately held responsible or whether she was an innocent scapegoat. I lean toward the latter opinion and consider myself fairly well informed on the matter.

Seymour Hersh is also well informed on the matter including having a number of Pentagon contacts disgusted enough with the Bush team deception to be whistleblowing in Hersh's ear.

The lawsuit was indeed filed and according to the Seattle Times, included 330 pages of documentation and testimony.

The Center for Constitutional Rights failed in a 2004 bid to launch a German investigation, as prosecutors cited that the United States was looking into abuse allegations on its own. But the center's President Michael Ratner cited several changes since then:

• Rumsfeld's resignation means he will be a private citizen soon, stripping him of any customary European immunity as a defense minister;

• A New York lawyer has met with and received permission to speak for a Saudi captive at Guantánamo, Mohammed al-Qahtani, who, according to leaked reports, was subjected to controversial, intensive interrogation techniques at Guantánamo — among them long bouts of sleep deprivation, isolation and sexual humiliation.

• Congress' new Military Commissions Act attempts to grant immunity to the U.S. military and civilian leaders for past interrogations, throwing the ball into Europe's court.

"It's crucial here to get accountability, some way to say that somewhere up the chain of command, people did something contrary to the Geneva Conventions," Ratner said.
Click to expand...
The jurisdiction cited is referred to in the Times article.
German legislators in 2002 gave prosecutors the power to investigate international human-rights crimes regardless where they were carried out. The underlying principle is that countries are unlikely to be self-policing on such crimes. U.S. sovereignty, along with the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, effectively protects senior government figures while still in office. What happens when they return to private life is another matter.
Click to expand...
I haven't looked into any Secretary of the Treasury charges yet. And, of course none of this adds any credence to the junk in the OP.
 
skeptigirl said:
Karpinski may be trying to get even or clear her name, depending on if you think she was legitimately held responsible or whether she was an innocent scapegoat. I lean toward the latter opinion and consider myself fairly well informed on the matter.

Seymour Hersh is also well informed on the matter including having a number of Pentagon contacts disgusted enough with the Bush team deception to be whistleblowing in Hersh's ear.

The lawsuit was indeed filed and according to the Seattle Times, included 330 pages of documentation and testimony.

The jurisdiction cited is referred to in the Times article.I haven't looked into any Secretary of the Treasury charges yet. And, of course none of this adds any credence to the junk in the OP.
Click to expand...

That's all very interesting stuff. Nothing about Paulson; however, if I had read in the Seattle Times that he had been arrested in Germany, I'd be far more inclined to believe it. It kinda throws a kink in to the theory of suppression, though. I mean, we're so concerned with protecting Paulson, but Rumsfeld is anyone's target? Seems rather silly to me.
 
skeptigirl said:
Karpinski may be trying to get even or clear her name, depending on if you think she was legitimately held responsible or whether she was an innocent scapegoat.
Click to expand...
Karpinski was at best an incompetent schmuck hopelessly in over her head in a job she couldn't handle and had no business having. This is her only possible defense, if she was smart she'd let it go and just fade away.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
yep, and thats an accrued loss over the course of year (i think since WW2)

but thats not really missing, they just dont know specifically where it went, they know it was spent, they just dont know what specifically it was spent on (they didnt save the reciepts)
Click to expand...


Think about it, how many bright young kids say, "When I grow up, I want to be..."


wait for it...

"...an ACCOUNTANT..."

wait for it...

"...IN THE ARMY."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom