• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Transfer factor

Rolfe

Adult human female
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
53,754
Location
NT 150 511
I had a look at this last night as a result of a comment in another thread, and then this morning one of the lab reports I had to scrutinise included in the history that the cat had been treated with "transfer factor". In that case apparently as some sort of catch-all immune stimulant.

General page about transfer factor.
Veterinary page.

Some of the writing seems relatively scientific, but the general presentation, especially the claims to cure all manner of diverse ills and the heavy reliance on testimonials, quacks like a duck. Does anyone have any experience with this subject? Is there any validity to the science of it?

Rolfe.

Hmmm, I just noticed that that page is also very keen on homoeopathy, and indeed the cat I referred to was treated with homoeopathy in addition to the transfer factor, so my woo alert level has increased exponentially.

Oh, and they're antivax as well. Which is approximately where we came in....
 
Last edited:
I think Transfer factors are one of those concepts that were thought to have great therapeutic potential but never really cut the mustard. I can find no trials with clear benefits in a major illness which does not already have better therapies available.
There is even an international TF symposium each year.

Other refs:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8363241
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids==6248292
 
First of all, I apologize for the lengthy C&P. I would just post links, but I can't, as of yet. (Post count thing).
Anyway, here's what the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology has to say about it in a Q&A area.

The question...
American Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology
5/29/2003 RE: Validity of transfer factor
 I would appreciate it if you could provide or direct me to a source for information regarding Transfer Factor. The Web site (deleted) warns of fraudulent preparations but also suggests that it is "snake oil" by definition since nobody "has yet purified TF." If it is snake oil (period), I would like to know.
And their answer..
This website is directed to health care professionals. Since it appears that you are not trained in the area of biomedicine, I will try to summarize a quite complex situation in relatively simple terms. There is still considerable uncertainty about transfer factor (TF) more than 40 years after the first descriptions of TF activity by Lawrence and colleagues. As I see it, there are a a few aspects of TF about which there is general agreement

1) TF continues to be defined by a biological activity -- the capacity to confer a delayed hypersensitivity (a form of cell-mediated immunity) from a sensitive to a non-sensitive human However, Lawrence's group feels that there may be both activating and suppressing types of TF (see enclosed abstract)

2) TF is a relatively low molecular weight agent (in the range of 3300-10,000 daltons) compound, probably composed mainly of amino acids. .There may be groups, of TF, each specific for particular antigens (see enclosed abstract) . Molecular approaches are currently being used to further characterize the molecular structure of TF.

However, there is considerable controversy is about the possible therapeutic effects of TF in one or another human disorders. Part of the confusion is due to the fact that each group investigating effects of TF in clinical disorders makes their own TF preparations with no evidence to date whether the active ingredients in these preparations are identical or not. Also, most of the clinical studies have not been adequately controlled or "blinded" to avoid possible patient or observer biases. In some cases, an almost evangelical approach to the use of TF has been employed, leading critics to label such approaches as "snake oil" treatments. I believe that well-designed carefully controlled studies employing a standardized TF prep would be worth undertaking to determine whether there is any valid therapeutic role for TF.
Biotherapy 1996;9(1-3):1-5
Transfer factor--current status and future prospects.
Lawrence HS, Borkowsky W.
Department of Medicine, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.

We have detected new clues to the composition and function of "Transfer Factor" using the direct Leucocyte Migration Inhibition (LMI) test as an in vitro assay of Dialysates of Leucocyte Extracts (DLE). This approach has revealed two opposing antigen-specific activities to be present in the same > 3500 < 12,000 DA dialysis fraction - one activity is possessed of Inducer/Helper function (Inducer Factor). The opposing activity is possessed of Suppressor function (Suppressor Factor). When non-immune leucocyte populations are cultured with Inducer Factor they acquire the capacity to respond to specific antigen and inhibition of migration occurs. This conversion to reactivity is antigen-specific and dose-dependent. When immune leucocyte populations are cultured with Suppressor Factor their response to specific antigen is blocked and Inhibition of Migration is prevented.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993 Jun 23;685:362-8
Structural nature and functions of transfer factors.
Kirkpatrick CH.
Conrad D. Stephenson Laboratory for Research in Immunology, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, Colorado 80206.

Transfer factors are molecules that "educate" recipients to express cell-mediated immunity. This effect is antigen-specific. The most consistent effects of transfer factors on the immune system are expression of delayed-type hypersensitivity and production of lymphokines such as macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which is probably identical to gamma-interferon in response to exposure to antigen. Transfer factors bind to antigens in an immunologically specific manner. This discovery has enabled us to isolate individual transfer factors from mixtures that contain several transfer factors. This reactivity probably explains the specificity of individual transfer factors, and it has provided a method for purification of individual transfer factors to apparent homogeneity. The purified materials are immunologically active and antigen-specific. They have molecular weights of approximately 5,000 Da and appear to be composed entirely of amino acids. Transfer factors appear to offer a novel means of molecular immunotherapy for certain patients with defective cell-mediated immunity.
Biotherapy 1996;9(1-3):77-9
The use of transfer factors in chronic fatigue syndrome: prospects and problems.
Levine PH.
Viral Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by severe prolonged unexplained fatigue and a variety of associated symptoms such as arthralgias, myalgias, cognitive dysfunction, and severe sleep disturbances. Many patients initially present with an acute onset of apparent infectious origin with either an upper respiratory or gastrointestinal illness, fever, chills, tender lymphadenopathy, and malaise suggestive of a flu-like illness. In some cases, specific viral infections can be identified at the outset, particularly herpes viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Transfer factors (TF) with specific activity against these herpes viruses has been documented. With some studies suggesting that persistent viral activity may play a role in perpetuation of CFS symptoms, there appears to be a rationale for the use of TF in patients with CFS and recent reports have suggested that transfer factor may play a beneficial role in this disorder. This report focuses on the heterogeneity of CFS, the necessity for randomized coded studies, the importance of patient selection and sub-classification in clinical trials, and the need to utilize specific end-points for determining efficacy of treatment.

Here's one study from PubMed:
Transfer factor in chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis.



Department of Pediatrics, University of Bologna, Italy.

Fifteen patients suffering from chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis were treated with an in vitro produced TF specific for Candida albicans antigens and/or with TF extracted from pooled buffy coats of blood donors. CMI of the patients was assessed using the LMT and the LST in presence of candidine. The aim of the study was the clinical evaluation of TF treatment and the incidence of positive tests before, during, and after therapy. Immunological data were matched using the Chi square test. 87 LMT were performed for each antigen dose and at the dilution of 1/50, 58.9% (33/56) tests were positive during non-treatment or non-specific TF treatment. On the contrary 83.9% (26/31) were positive during specific TF treatment (P < 0.05). In the LST, a significant decrease of thymidine uptake in the control cultures in presence of autologous or AB serum was observed when patients were matched according to non-treatment, and both non specific (P < 0.05) and specific TF treatment (P < 0.01). Only during specific TF treatment was a significant increase of reactivity against the Candida antigen at the highest concentration noticed, when compared with the period of non specific treatment (P < 0.01). Clinical observations were encouraging: all but one patient experienced significant improvement during treatment with specific TF. These data confirm that orally administered specific TF, extracted from induced lymphoblastoid cell-lines, increases the incidence of reactivity against Candida antigens in the LMT. LST reactivity appeared not significantly increased with respect to the periods of non treatment, but was significantly increased when it was compared to the non-specific TF treatment periods. At the same time, a clinical improvement was noticed.

And another from pubmed:
Successful treatment of severe complicated measles with non-specific transfer factor.


Department of Hematology, Hospital General de Mexico, DF, Mexico.

Severe complicated measles has a high mortality rate and no specific treatment. Ten patients with complicated measles - 9 infants with respiratory failure and a 15 year old boy with encephalitis - received immunotherapy with Non-specific Transfer Factor (NTF). The patients had variable degrees of undernourishment and were severely ill when immunotherapy was started. 8/9 cases with respiratory failure were cured. One died of bronchoaspiration while recovering from the measles. The case with encephalitis showed no neurological sequelae two weeks after receiving the last dose of NTF. Treatment of complicated measles with NTF in these patients seemed very effective and deserves further trial.

Pubmed has a bunch, actually.
 
And to further clear up the confusion...
California's medicaid insurance provider has this to say about TF and how it should be billed and coded:


http://www.medicarenhic.com/cal_prov/articles/transferfactor_0206.htm
1. What is transfer factor?
Transfer factor is a term used in at least four different ways in allopathic and natural medicine.
(1) Transfer factor refers to bacterial proteins which facilitate gene transfer and insertion;
(2) Transfer factor is a term in pulmonary physiology to describe speed or ratio of gas transfers;
(3) Transfer factor is very widely used in holistic and naturopathic medicine to describe cow colostrum extracts and other natural food preparations which typically may be used orally or topically. Numerous internet websites sell "transfer factor" as a natural supplement in this sense; and
(4) Transfer factor refers to substances in dialyzed leukocyte extracts which affect cellular but not humoral immune function in experimental animals such as mice and in man.
This article is limited to the use of transfer factor only in the situation described in definition number 4.
It's safe to assume that the TF referred to in the OP is #3.
But what about the TF Brian Deer speaks of?
Example 1 - Preparation of DLE
Measles virus-specific TF is made from lymphocytes of BALB/c mice immunised by live or killed virus or an antigen derived from such measles virus. Isolated cells are freeze-thawed and, following micropore filtration the filtrate is added to an immunologically virgin human lymphoblastoid cell line. One cell is serially expanded 10-fold with killed measles virus and interleukin-2, to a billion cells. Measles virus specific TF preparations are made from this expanded cell population.
And here's another example of "genuine" TF from pubmed:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2897772&dopt=Abstract
1: Acta Virol. 1988 Jan;32(1):6-18. Related Articles, Links


De novo initiation of specific cell-mediated immune responsiveness in chickens by transfer factor (specific immunity inducer) obtained from bovine colostrum and milk.

Wilson GB, Poindexter C, Fort JD, Ludden KD.

Amtron, Inc., Charleston, South Carolina.

Transfer factors (TF) were prepared from colostrum and milk of bovines previously immunized with antigens obtained from Coccidioides immitis, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus, or from the viral agents responsible for avian Newcastle disease, laryngotracheitis disease or infectious bursal disease. The ability of bovine TF to transfer specific cell-mediated immune responsiveness to a markedly xenogenic species was studied using specific pathogen free (SPF) and standard commercial (SC) chickens as model recipients. Cell-mediated immune responsiveness was documented using one or more of the following for each antigen (organism) studied: (a) an in vitro chicken leukocyte (heterophil) migration inhibition assay; (b) delayed-wattle reactivity; or (c) protection from clinical disease. Chicken TFs obtained from spleens of immune donors were evaluated in parallel to bovine TF's in selected comparative studies. Bovine TF also referred to as specific immunity inducer (SII), and chicken TF were found to initiate antigen-specific cell-mediated immunity de novo in previously non-immune SPF chickens as well as in SC chickens despite the presence of maternally acquired humoral antibody which may serve as a "barrier" to immunization of SC chickens when commercially available vaccines are administered by parenteral routes. Bovine TF's specific for laryngotracheitis virus or infectious bursal disease virus afforded protection equal to that found for commercially available vaccines. Bovine TF's action was rapid (less than a day) and of relatively long duration at least 35 days.

PMID: 2897772 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 
And to further clear up the confusion.....

It's safe to assume that the TF referred to in the OP is #3.
But what about the TF Brian Deer speaks of?
Example 1 - Preparation of DLE
Measles virus-specific TF is made from lymphocytes of BALB/c mice immunised by live or killed virus or an antigen derived from such measles virus. Isolated cells are freeze-thawed and, following micropore filtration the filtrate is added to an immunologically virgin human lymphoblastoid cell line. One cell is serially expanded 10-fold with killed measles virus and interleukin-2, to a billion cells. Measles virus specific TF preparations are made from this expanded cell population.

And here's another example of "genuine" TF from pubmed:....
Kelly, forgive me if I sound testy, but I'm beginning to doubt your honesty here. Why didn't you link to the page from which you took the quote about "the TF Brian Deer speaks of"? Why are you trying to pretend that what he is doing is not "goat colostrum"?
http://briandeer.com/wakefield/goat-recipe.htm
Please note even the url of the page! Goat recipe! You posted links for your other quotes. Why not this one?

Why did you cut off the remainder of the quote, including the last paragraph where it becomes clear that what Wakefield is doing is essentially the same thing as your #3?
The ability of TF to stimulate further TF production, and the cross-species reactivity of TF are subsequently exploited in order to produce large amounts of concentrated TF at low cost. This is achieved by injecting the TF preparation into pregnant goats 3 times prior to delivery. Colostrums are collected during the first 3 days post-delivery and TF preparations were made from these by micropore filtration excluding molecules >12,500 mol wt. Following freeze thawing and lyophilising x 3 the preparation is tested for potency as described below and standardised at 200 South Carolina units/ml.
I agree that there is more than one thing apparently referred to as "transfer factor", but why are you so keen to cover up all the evidence that what Andrew Wakefield is doing is in the quack department?

What you are doing is not "clearing up the confusion", it looks like deliberate obfuscation.

Rolfe.
 
Last edited:
What you are doing is not "clearing up the confusion", it looks like deliberate obfuscation.
Oh please.
Why do you think I posted :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract
"Real" TF obviously can be gathered from those sources, too.
'Shirley's Wellness Cafe' variety TF has nothing to do with
(4) Transfer factor refers to substances in dialyzed leukocyte extracts which affect cellular but not humoral immune function in experimental animals such as mice and in man.

Brian Deer's presentation of this is one of the finest examples of equivocation
http://www.cuyamaca.net/bruce.thompson/Fallacies/equivocation.asp
I think I've ever run across.
 
Boy, am I feeling thick! I have a degree in Immunology, never heard of Transfer Factor, neither for that matter have my text books. Sounds to me like most of the information (and sales pitches) on the 'net are woo... strange how most of them are related to pets/autism. Don't get me started on Andrew Wakefield!
 
Last edited:
Boy, am I feeling thick! I have a degree in Immunology, never heard of Transfer Factor, neither for that matter have my text books. Sounds to me like most of the information (and sales pitches) on the 'net are woo... strange how most of them are related to pets/autism. Don't get me started on Andrew Wakefield!
:confused:
Of course sales pitches on the net are woo.

Are you saying transfer factor isn't legitimate at all just because the woos try to market it?

I'm not entirely sure what to say about your claim to never have heard about it before...
It's not my fault?
I dunno...take that issue up with whoever wrote your textbooks?
If it'll help, I'll compile a list of legitimate sources that talk about it.
 
Very funny.

How can Andrew Wakefield's "TF" be your #4 (apparently the only legit context according to your California quote, though considering the sort of woo I hear that US insurance providers pay out for all the time I'm not sure what that proves....) if what he's actually giving the kids is lyophilised goat colostrum?

(Pun not intended when typed.)

Rolfe.

#1)
Brian Deer's site refer's to a patent, which would have to be tested for effectiveness and saftey before being marketed as a drug.
He's not giving kids goat colostrum pills in America.

#2) If you honestly can't see that the methods of preparation described in the patent differ markedly from the "fringe" transfer factor sold by loonies on the net, as implied by Brian Deer, who said Wakefield "discovered it", which is also an outright lie, then I don't know what to say.
 
Transfer factor is not mentioned in mainstream immunology. It might be some factor of regulatory T cells. But I don't get how it is antigen specific. For this to be the case then the protein (it's made of amino acids we are told) must have the capacity to recognise a large number (millions?) of antigens which would imply it would be a member of the immunoglobulin family capable of gene shuffling. But immunoglobulins are very large molecules certainly much larger than the 5-10k molecular weight described. Also, how is it functional after passing through the digestive processes when taken orally? Which points to secretroy IgA which is resistant to digestion but again IgA is a very large molecule. Perhaps TF is a degraded fragment of IgA? Why has no one sequenced it and found out?
 
Capsid, I was wondering about the antigenic specificity as well. AFAIK, the only parts of the immune system that are Ag specific are large molecules. Fair enough, some of the components are small, but these aren't specific at all. If its a cytokine however, the smallest one is IL-8, which if memory serves is <10k molecular weight. You'd think they would have discovered whether its this or not already. Mind cytokines aren't specific either. If it is degraded IgA, you'd think that the part resposible would be the Fab part of the antibody, but as its a protein, removing the Fc portion would render the rest of the molecule useless. (Wouldn't it?)

PS, haven't done anything in the immunology line in a few years, amazing how stuff comes back to you when you think about it! :hit:
 
Yes, sesmo, absence of the Fc portion would remove several functions, such as binding to cells for opsonisation, complement fixing. I can't see how this ties in with delayed type hypersensitivity though. Perhaps it is a part of the T cell receptor.
 
I was hazy about the antigen-specificity of the stuff too. And yet Wakefield's text specifically refers to "measles virus specific transfer factor". Wakefield isn't an immunologist, and I find this all very strange when the basic subject isn't one that is part of mainstream immunology.

He then seems to take a leap into pure fantasy when he declares that
The ability of TF to stimulate further TF production, and the cross-species reactivity of TF are subsequently exploited in order to produce large amounts of concentrated TF at low cost. This is achieved by injecting the TF preparation into pregnant goats 3 times prior to delivery. Colostrums are collected....
Capsid, is any of this legitimate science? As far as I'm aware the function of colostrum is that it contains large amounts of IgG (which can only be absorbed by the neonatal gut for a very short period) and IgA.

As I read the evidence, Andrew Wakefield is giving children capsules of lyophilised goat colostrum. If this is not the case, I'm more likely to be persuaded by rational argument and evidence than by snide remarks.

Rolfe.
 
I was hazy about the antigen-specificity of the stuff too. And yet Wakefield's text specifically refers to "measles virus specific transfer factor". Wakefield isn't an immunologist, and I find this all very strange when the basic subject isn't one that is part of mainstream immunology.

As far as I'm aware the function of colostrum is that it contains large amounts of IgG (which can only be absorbed by the neonatal gut for a very short period) and IgA.

As I read the evidence, Andrew Wakefield is giving children capsules of lyophilised goat colostrum. If this is not the case, I'm more likely to be persuaded by rational argument and evidence than by snide remarks.

Rolfe.

I really don't know what is going on here for sure. The cell preparation used to immunise goats could very well contain the measles virus or fragments of it since the cells are expanded by exposure to measles virus. The preparation is then dialysed with a molecular weight cut off of 12,000 which is certainly large enough to be immunogenic. So the goats make an antibody response to a measles component and these are concentrated into the colostrum. The colostrum is given to young children and the IgA is able to cross the intestine and provide passive protection against measles.

I still don't get how this elicits delayed type hypersensitivity unless the subjects are positive before receiving the colostrum.
 
So the goats make an antibody response to a measles component and these are concentrated into the colostrum. The colostrum is given to young children and the IgA is able to cross the intestine and provide passive protection against measles.
Kids (the caprine variety) only retain the ability to absorb colostral antibodies for about 48 hours max following birth. After that the gut epithelium closes up and the only protection will be local.

I understand that even this much doesn't happen in human children, where the passive immunity from milk is entirely local, and passive humoral antibody is acquired before birth due to the very intimate contact between foetal and maternal blood in the haemo-endothelial placenta.

So I totally fail to see how giving human children who are at the very youngest a few years old anything by mouth can do any more than provide local gut protection.

Rolfe.
 
Kids (the caprine variety) only retain the ability to absorb colostral antibodies for about 48 hours max following birth. After that the gut epithelium closes up and the only protection will be local.

I understand that even this much doesn't happen in human children, where the passive immunity from milk is entirely local, and passive humoral antibody is acquired before birth due to the very intimate contact between foetal and maternal blood in the haemo-endothelial placenta.

So I totally fail to see how giving human children who are at the very youngest a few years old anything by mouth can do any more than provide local gut protection.

Rolfe.

Agreed. I was incorrect about IgA crossing the human intestine (I can never remember that). But the colostrum will provide protection nonetheless and does so for around 6 months of breastfeeding.
 

Back
Top Bottom