• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Top 10 Connections between NIST and Nanothermite

When NIST wrote their FAQ they only talked about thermite. That's because at the time, twoofers hadn't dreamt up there nanoo thermite yet.

NIST could not have imagined the stupidity of twoofers to come up with this stuff, and it's probably because of NIST's experience with "nanothermite" (do they even have any?) that they knew it could never have been applied to a building demolition.
 
When NIST wrote their FAQ they only talked about thermite. That's because at the time, twoofers hadn't dreamt up there nanoo thermite yet.

NIST could not have imagined the stupidity of twoofers to come up with this stuff, and it's probably because of NIST's experience with "nanothermite" (do they even have any?) that they knew it could never have been applied to a building demolition.

You think twoofers came up with nanothermites?
 
The stupid part is that a millimeter thick coat of nano-thermite is going to blow through a steel beam. It would do nothing more than make a bright flash. Try taking some gun powder and spreading it out on the floor and tossing a match to it. It will not blow a hole in your floor. It might take off your eyebrows though.
 
You think twoofers came up with nanothermites?

Hey Fwacter, why don't you follow up your silly little post with a little math on how a nanometer thick layer of super thermite can heat up a beam measured in meters.

Or just get mad about the fact that most of us consider "twoofers" or as you like to be called "facters" the same worthless douchebags. Yeah, whine about that, "facter."
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, the infamous Kevin Ryan Nanothermite Paper of 2008. Who could forget that tumultuous summer after this bombshell was dropped? The worldwide support it received, the blitz of media coverage, the riots, the overthrowing of governments.... It is truly a landmark in the annals of sociopolitical history and scientific thought. In short, it changed the world.

Meanwhile, back in reality, no one paid any attention to nonsense on a conspiracy theorist website, and over a year later RedIbis went rummaging through the Truther Dumpster to post it in another one of his stupid "I dare you to debunk it" threads.

It is great when you post dirt dumb stuff from the frauds who dumb down 9/11 for those who can't understand reality. That is the most anti-intellectual journal I have seen. Good job exposing paranoid nut case conspiracy dolts. Nice job.

The dogs were all paid off with kosher milk bones by their Mossad handlers.
:dogt:

"oy RUFF!" "oy RUFF!"



Indefatigable J-REFers Valiantly Mine
Yet Fail To Deplete
Inexhaustible Lode of Falser Stupid.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
You can bring a Falser to facts but you can't make him think.
 
Last edited:
1) No explosives / ther* - dogs checked it out



Post by tfk

BTW, just one more (of about 6) definitive proofs of "no themite, no explosives"...

But, IMO, a superb proof.

http://ronmossad.blogspot.com/2009/...howComment=1240395840000#c6101665985354960506

wardogs said...

Thank you Ron for both your patience and equanimity in dealing with this subject.

I am owner and trainer of a K9 training and deployment company in FL. We have been breeding, training and deploying our purpose bred explosive detection and SAR dogs for over 40 years as well as training K9's for the Military, LE and private industry.

In addition we are a FEMA Incident Response Team/First Responder K9 unit for FEMA Task Force II, Miami.

It was in the latter capacity that we were went to NY on 9/11 as part of the FL Task Force, arriving on scene about 3 1/2 hours after the second tower fell. We went with 4 of our dogs and handlers. Our main function was US&R, live person, (not cadaver search) but all of our dogs are cross trained in several disciplines, including EDD and Incendiary detection. In addition, of the over 300 K9 teams that came from all over the world, there were more than 70 other EDD K9's present on site. This is on top of the 6 full time EDD dogs employed full time at the WTC site, 3 of which I had trained personally. Besides the presence of the normal team that patrolled in shifts 24/7, there had been an ADDITIONAL team of 16 explosives interdiction K9's on duty for several weeks prior to the attack. They were there in response to bomb threats against the center (unrelated) and had only been removed 5 days prior to the attack. 6 of those dogs were also trained by our company.

No explosives or incendiary devices were planted anywhere in that complex. None. Our dogs and the other EDD K9's would have alerted after the fact as well. It's what they are trained for. We staged for the two weeks we were there at the Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island. This is where much of the structural steel was brought. Despite rumors to the contrary, chain of custody was maintained and virtually all of the steel was cataloged and vital pieces were inspected. Not a single dog ever alerted to the presence of either explosives or incendiary residue.
Not one.

...

I'm not a scientist, but I am an expert on explosives/incendiaries, their use and detection both before and after detonation. I've testified as an expert witness more than 70 times at court proceedings on explosives detection, K9 training protocol and K9 scent differrention capability.

No explosives or incendiaries were present at the Trade Center on 9/11.
__

Tom

===================================================
2) WTC1,2 debris removed at site and all handsorted at Fresh Kills - no evidence of chords, detonators etc by anyone, onsite or off.

3) No evidence of explosively damaged perimeter or core column assemblies.



===================================================

Still Utterly Completely Entirely Conclusively Wrong.

Again.
Give It Up.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can't reason someone out of something they were not reasoned into - Swift


Dogs? Just google - dogs failed explosives

Dogs?
 
Meanwhile back at Truther Headquarters:

Truther1: "Hey lets make up a story about thermite and say it was used in the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks?"

Truther2: "Great idea! Then after that gets debunked we'll claim it's thermate."

Truther3: "Guys, fellas. I had a vision last night, how about super-thermite?"

Truther4: "NO, NO, NO, NO! You guys are missing the point. If we claim it's thermite, thermate and super-thermite it'll get debunked like that. Let's claim that nano-thermite brought down the Towers!"

Truther5: "EXCELLENT IDEA! That way it'll be impossible to detect since it's microscopic. All those in favor say "I"!

Everyone says "I"

Truth Movement Counsel: "Brillant fellas, thanks for that great piece of disinformation. Motion carried!"
 
Last edited:
Bill, just a request: Could you try learning something about what you are posting about BEFORE posting? Just once? I've only been here a couple months and your profound, and hard-fought, ignorance about pretty much anything leaves you wide open to be ripped apart every time you post, and also leaves you unaware that it had happened so you do it over and over again.

Really, by now a planarian with a functioning nervous system would have figured out that "any post by anybody else" equaled "I just got burnt" and would avoid interactions with higher lifeforms.
 
Last edited:
Dogs? Just google - dogs failed explosives

Dogs?

Is this supposed to be, like, ya know, an argument ...?

Would you care to try again?

You might want to consider a) the quantity & b) the packaging of your comparison examples.

Tom
 
This reminds me of the great Scholars Folly Quote Mine collapse of 2006.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66760

Thanks JH

30 out of the park posts.
That Thread Lies in Another Beyond Unsurpassed Funny Dimension.:D
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.' - Alice in Wonderland
 
Last edited:
Why do truthers think fire cant cause steel to fail but spraying on a thin layer of nanothermite can?

lol
 
The "stupid" part comes not from the existence of such material in a lab, but the idea that every square inch of the WTC was sprayed with this stuff

Who said every square inch of the WTC was sprayed with the stuff? Exaggeration is a sign of desperation.

Is there a connection between NIST and nanothermites? Yes or no.
 
Who said every square inch of the WTC was sprayed with the stuff? Exaggeration is a sign of desperation.

Is there a connection between NIST and nanothermites? Yes or no.

David Ray Griffin of course! That's Griffins exaggeration mind you.

NO!

I don't know how anyone could ever go from Thermite, to Thermate, to Super-Thermite to end up with Nano-Thermite. It's all the same stuff if anyone actually looks it up.
 
David Ray Griffin of course! That's Griffins exaggeration mind you.

NO!

I don't know how anyone could ever go from Thermite, to Thermate, to Super-Thermite to end up with Nano-Thermite. It's all the same stuff if anyone actually looks it up.

Quote him then.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom