I can't help but think that Tom Cruise's outbursts can only do good.delphi_ote said:When I saw this, I vowed never to see a movie with Tom Cruise in it again. He'll not get a penny of my money, because that was dangerous and irresponsible. Where does someone who believes in E-meters get off calling ANYTHING pseudoscience?
My brother has generalized anxiety disorder. He literally can't leave the house at times without medication. A close friend is OCD, and gets suicidal without medication. Another childhood friend had severe ADD. The days he didn't take his medication he was absolutely unbearable. He drove himself insane. I can remember him nearly breaking into tears from frustration that he couldn't concentrate or keep still.
I wish as much as anyone else that these wonderful and capable people could just think their way out of these maladaptive behavioral patterns, but that is just a fantasy. I care about these people deeply, and I am greatful they are able to live very productive lives because of this medication and therapy. My brother is getting a degree in computer science now and creates fantastic electronic music. My OCD friend is earning a PhD in history from a VERY good university. The ADD friend is a cinematographer in L.A. Maybe he'll shoot a movie with Cruise in it some day. Their problems are not made up, as Cruise seems to think (i.e. "no chemical imbalance.") It's not that simple. Because we've listened and taken these problems seriously as a society, because we've done our best to apply the scientific method to our own behavior, we've been able to improve my friends' quality of life.
Cruise did a lot of damage saying these things. Think of all of the unstable celebrity worshippers who might believe his pathetic "I know the history of psychology" appeal to nonexistent authority. I'm not going to pretend like psychology is a perfect field, but it's made a lot of progress and benefitted a lot of people. A lot more people than Scientology ever will.
lumos said:When it comes to a real health issue, I'll bet Tom Cruise will have no problem seeing a real doctor, especially if his life depended on it.
How the hell do these cults warp people like this? Amazing.
Ripley Twenty-Nine said:Let's be honest, most of us nowadays know people who have genuinely been helped by anti-depressants. The evidence is all around us. So when Tom Cruise tells us that vitamins and exercise will solve all problems, he just looks like a brainwashed idiot.
Not exactly. He has been quoted on numerous occasions as saying something to the effect of "The best way to make a million dollars is to start a religion."aargh57 said:I was told once that Scientology was started by L. Ron Hubbard as a bet. Has anyone heard this and is there any truth to it?
Psi Baba said:Compared to the incomprehesible amounts of money $cientology deals with daily, Hubbard's use of the term "a million dollars" in retrospect echoes that of the out-of-date Dr. Evil in the first Austin Powers movie.
Minkster said:Firstly, my memory is hazy - but don't Scien's believe something along the line that aliens are trying to brainwash people through their psychiatrist workers?
I was told once that Scientology was started by L. Ron Hubbard as a bet. Has anyone heard this and is there any truth to it?
...
Perhaps if the impatient Cruise had waited until he achieved OT-VIII, his increased mastery of the universe might have allowed him to score a suspicious relationship with a higher caliber of starlet, like Scarlett Johansson or Jessica Alba. Settling for Holmes was such an OT-VII move
...
HarryKeogh said:
The "bet" form of the rumor is wrongFrancois Tremblay said:We'll never know for sure. All we have is vague testimonies of a couple people who claim to have heard it. Either way, it makes for a good story, and knowing Hubbard's braggard character at the time, it's actually plausible.
but more than a couple people have heard him make his famous "start a religion" quotation:One form of the rumor is that L. Ron Hubbard made a bar bet with Robert A. Heinlein. This is definitely not true. It's uncharacteristic of Heinlein, and there's no supporting evidence.
Non-Scientologist faq on "Start a religion"To summarize: we have nine witnesses: Neison Himmel, Sam Merwin, Sam Moskowitz, Theodore Sturgeon, Lloyd Arthur Eshbach, Harlan Ellison, and the three unnamed witnesses of Robert Vaughn Young. There is some confusion and doubt about one of them (Sam Moskowitz). Two are reported via Russel Miller: one is reported via Mike Jittlov: one reported in his autobiography; one reported in an affidavit; and one reported to me in person. The reports describe different events, meaning that Hubbard said it perhaps six times, in six different venues - definitely not just once. And the Church's official disclaimer is now reportedly a flat lie.
Conclusion: He definitely said it more than once.
Minkster said:What is great about all this is that I am now seeing negative posts about Scientology everywhere with seemingly every messageboard/forum (not just skeptic ones!) containing at least one anti-scientology thread.
Scientology has its roots in a maverick form of psychological counseling that rejects the principles of modern psychiatry. In 1950, L. Ron Hubbard published Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health. (He founded the Church of Scientology a few years later.) The book outlined a philosophy of mental and physical illness and a method for treatment. Hubbard rejected the notion that psychiatry could provide lasting cures for psychological problems and condemned psychiatric treatments he deemed inhumane, like electroconvulsive therapy.
The extent of the feud might stem from the immediate backlash that Hubbard received from mainstream mental health organizations. Dianetics was published in May 1950; by September, the American Psychological Association had advised therapists to avoid it. Not long after, the board of medical examiners in Hubbard's home state of New Jersey pursued legal action against him for practicing phony medicine.