autumn1971
Illuminator
That's a picture of pure freedom.
That’s a picture of a wife searching tinder. And Bumble, and plenty of fish, or whatever dating app is current
That's a picture of pure freedom.
A mother who ran into Robb Elementary School to rescue her two children during a mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas, last week says police threatened to violate her probation for speaking about the incident to reporters.
Angeli Gomez told CBS News on Thursday that she was forced to rush into the school after watching police fail to quickly respond to the deadly shooting. A total of 19 students and two teachers were killed when 18-year-old gunman Salvador Ramos entered the school and opened fire.
After speaking critically about the incident to media outlets, Gomez said an officer threatened to charge her for violating probation on an unrelated charge for "obstruction of justice." However, she added that she spoke to a local judge who assured her that she was "brave" and that she would not face legal repercussions for sharing her story.
Her account comes amid a flurry of similar reports from parents and relatives who said they were on-site during the devastating massacre and watched as police failed to intervene.
A Uvalde mother claims that cops have threatened her with retaliatory arrest should she talk to the press:
https://www.newsweek.com/uvalde-mom-who-saved-kids-school-shooting-says-police-threatened-her-1712842
Pigs gonna pig.
She should be very worried what is going to happen to her once the media spotlight is off the town. The cops will not soon forget.
But not a single poster is moved to the slightest comment. Why do you suppose that posters here are indifferent to such a horrific crime? Recall the recent black man who opened fire on a Brooklyn subway. Again, no one has much to say, just a little skirting around the edges.
Uhh, maybe she should just focus on not winding up on probation again? Just because she is happy to shout about the cops doesn't mean she is excused from it and the terms associated.
I'm sure every time she gets a ticket from now until the end of time, she will blame the evil cops for targeting her. Like what do you figure, evil cop hit squad will target her for extermination once the spotlight is off?![]()
I clipped most of the bull **** but here's the deal. How many people died in the Brooklyn subway shooting? Anyone?
She should be very worried what is going to happen to her once the media spotlight is off the town. The cops will not soon forget.
Jesus Christ. Yes, because killing her would be the only way for them to make her life suck. Why do you do this **** all the time? Do you think it's tough to see through?
You come to a thread about mass shootings, but have to endure conjecture about evil cops targeting civilians and ruining people's lives after the fact. It is ridiculous.
You come to a thread about mass shootings, but have to endure conjecture about evil cops targeting civilians and ruining people's lives after the fact. It is ridiculous.
In fairness, it's not only conjecture about evil cops targeting civilians. There's also observations about cowardly cops who failed to do their jobs and let children get slaughtered.
This country has a Black problem disguised as a mental illness problem disguised as a gun problem. Relatedly, I don't have a podcast paying tens of millions a year for this kind of quality insight.
If you think about it, if there were no victims, there would be no criminals.
It isn't conjecture, they threatened to violate her probation with s trumped up 'obstructing justice' charge because she spoke to the press.
These are cops that let children die in front of them rather than taking action, handcuffed a parent at the scene then refused to cooperate with the inquiry.
Why is it hard to believe they are evil?
I'm reminded of George Zimmerman. When the narrative was to try to portray a guy who tutored black kids as a seething racist, he was transformed from an Hispanic to the rarely seen, extremely dangerous "White Hispanic" category.
As promised, I'm back with receipts. Hold onto your socks, they're about to get knocked off.
Since the Uvalde shooting nearly 2 weeks ago, I've noticed a lot of MSM using an organization called "Education Week" as a source of school shootings in the US, they keep a running count of all shootings at US schools. If their information is good enough for WaPo, NPR, NBC News, The Hill, etc. it's good enough for me. They list every school shooting and do not use some hocus-pocus formulation to skew the numbers to fit a particular narrative.
Of the 27 shootings at US schools this year, 16 of them have publicly available identifying information of the known shooters. Here's a breakdown:
14 black males
8 Latino males.
1 Asian male.
11 shootings have no suspect description, currently. A lot of these are because courts and law enforcement do not release information about juveniles.
Between 1982 and June 2022, 68 out of the 129 mass shootings in the United States were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was African American in 21 mass shootings, and Latino in 11. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 53 percent, 16 percent, and 8.5 percent respectively.
I'm kidding, it won't help at all. You'll be back with some other ****-ery and it will be equally as hilarious.
The hilarious part is you quoting a source that represents that there were only 129 mass shootings in the US over a 40-year span. I feel like you have missed a whole lot of posts in this thread; including the ones about that laughable stat.