• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Lefty freaks and lunatics:

“Are you a white man? If you’re a white man, then shut the **** up about race, because you don’t know **** other than how to rape and kill.”



Guy doesn't even look that black to me. Looks like quarter Latino or something.
 
The protest was legit, just New York is able to swallow crowds.

Legit in the sense that they really mean it, sure. Never doubted that.

I heard (from someone I know in New York City, not media) that there were finally a few arrests yesterday. Very peaceful. No "resisting arrest".

It was for wearing masks.

Two alternative speculations.

1) They put on the masks to make the "real" protesters looks bad.

2) they put on the masks for the purpose of getting arrested, which confers some sort of revolutionary credibility. Even if your rich daddy bails you out. It's part of the total protester experience.
 
The masks were probably anarchists. Anarchists love playing dress-up. They're a bunch of posers.
 
Last edited:
Lefty freaks and lunatics:

“Are you a white man? If you’re a white man, then shut the **** up about race, because you don’t know **** other than how to rape and kill.”



Guy doesn't even look that black to me. Looks like quarter Latino or something.

"Black folks are talking back at the power structure".

The president of the country is blacker than this dickweed.
Sheesh.
 
I am amused at the fact that the people involved with this demonstration take great pains to emphasize how peaceful they are:

People were peacefully assembling on the sidewalk and the police told the public that they could not stand on public sidewalks. one person, was standing peacefully on the sidewalk and holding up a sign and the police swarmed him and arrested him. he peacefully went with them, without resisting in any way. People then peacefully walked with him and chanted in solidarity.
(bolding added for emphasis)

And yet they named it the day of rage, obviously intending to evoke the days of rage in 1969, which was specifically planned as a violent clash with Chicago police.
 
Lefty freaks and lunatics:

“Are you a white man? If you’re a white man, then shut the **** up about race, because you don’t know **** other than how to rape and kill.”



Guy doesn't even look that black to me. Looks like quarter Latino or something.

Is that little boy in the green shirt with that tall chick on his right?
 
Will Bunch makes a rather silly comparison:

What do you think was running in the pro-government, pro-Mubarek newspapers in Egypt back in February, when crowds of unhappy and often un- or under-employed citizens began crowding into Tahrir Square? I don't know the answer to that, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say there probably wasn't a lot of coverage of what was happening in Tahrir Square, at least at first. They were probably running cute feature stories about an old-time falafel stand in a changing Cairo neighborhood, or maybe articles on parking problems at the Great Pyramids. They certainly weren't going to call attention to the elephant in the room that was about to knock over a corrupt and decadent society.

I was thinking about that this week, during the extra time I had on my hands because I wasn't reading in the pages of the New York Times or the Washington Post about the Wall Street protests that have been going on now for four days, with hundreds of disenchanted and disaffected youth camping out nightly in a lower Manhattan park, marching on the financial district by day, getting arrested and provoking a large police presence including a phalanx of NYPD cops guarding the notorious Merrill Lynch bronze idol of greed.

And he contrasts it with their coverage of the Tea Party:

You could make the argument that the American media just doesn't like covering protests. But then you'd be only half-right. News organizations haven't spared many resources in tracking conservative Tea Party protests across America - even though the numbers of people attending those rallies have fallen off sharply in the last year. It's just left-leaning protests that the media gets really queasy about covering, as evidenced by this bizarre case right here in Philadelphia involving the Inquirer's reluctance to pay attention to protests at the home of Cigna's CEO.

Yeah, remember all the glowing, positive coverage that the media have given to the Tea Partiers?

Actually the real reason the media aren't covering the day of rage is because they don't want to show the public the crazy face of anti-capitalist leftism. Which of course, is exactly why blogs like Zombietime are covering it.

Video:
 
Last edited:
And even better, Gawker uses opposition to the Day of Rage nuts to somehow imply that they are opposed by champagne-sippers:
As the first week of the #occupywallstreet protest against corporate stuff draws to a close, some classy capitalists have decided to dust off their favorite Nixon-era jargon and hold a champagne-soaked counter-protest of their own. Free laxative-enriched muffins for all "hippies," LOL.

Free brain-cell unenriched muffins for the Gawker blogger, who clearly never heard of skepticism.
 
Actually, it is true that at least one person wanted to literally soak the protesters with champagne. But leave it to Gawker to twist everything around.

*********** hipsters.
 
Crowd seemed to be growing substantially. Of course, yesterday was a weekend, so that might explain it. Here's a video of them marching and the arrests; love that wackadoodle voice over. Might be NSFW:

 
Have they decided on their demand yet?

As a far lefty, it is interesting that the crowd I pall around with has been giving this event the cold shoulder. The Tea Party had strong media interest, which was a sort of "chicken or egg" thing with respect to its numbers. Even Colbert just mentioned them to make fun of them.
 
It's ugly, but it's hardly a crowd.

Indeed. I just got home from doing a run in Manhattan and was disgusted by what I saw in Zuccotti Park (near the World Trade Center site). There was no protest, just maybe 40 filty young people either sleeping in the park, doing drugs and/or walking around naked. The smell was overwhelming. There were signs written on cardboard clogging up the sidewalk and many were panhandling.
 
What gets me are the folks (including Greg Laden, it seems) who are complaining it's getting no coverage. Of course it isn't. It's a blip on the surface of national happenings. The only thing of import that seemed to occur was a possible unnecessary pepper spraying of fenced in female protestors.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom