a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
What do you think, Israelis are stupid?
No more than that farmer.
What do you think, Israelis are stupid?
Tolerate them? Of course not. However, you obviously tailor your response to the threat. So I spend a lot of time listening to people tell me how this rag tag band of busted arse insurgents is somehow going to "wipe out Israel" or "butcher the jews" or "drive Israelis into the sea".
What's to concede? Israel didn't take any land from them, but from Jordan, Syria and Egypt. There was no sovereign "Palestine" from which to take land.Although I wasn't absolutely specific I was refering to concessions to palestinians and not Egyptians, Syrians or lebanese.
You missed the point. Go back and read your original quote, snip off the last clause and understand it as referring to the Palestinians.wants the land, doesn't want the unsuitable people is more how I would judge it. Israel will take as much land as it can that surrounds Jerusalem while ensuring the numbers of undesirable people does not exceed a nomonally acceptable level (the level above which keeping them powerless would be incompatable with the claim of democracy).
Until it is resolved? Until what is resolved? The violence?
They weren't British, they were UN-proposed. Guess who accepted it and who rejected it? Guess how that rejection played out?Sorry David, I listen to all sorts of stories on this forum but the most common is that Israel does what it does because of arab violence...as if Israel would be sitting inside those silly original British partition lines with Jerusalem as an international city if some arabs had never got violent.
What has changed in Jerusalem since the Gaza pullout is the announcement that Israel is going to redraw its boundries and take whatever land arround it that it wishes....Can you imagine what would have been the reaction to this little announcement if it was not done during the current gaza show?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/723677.html
Yuval Diskin reveals that "World Jihad" is now establishing new, larger and more complex threats...
However, you obviously tailor your response to the threat.
otherwise you could not be convinced they deserve no rights.
....you can behave civily or you can discuss these issues for the rest of this thread with someone else.Are you insane, The Fool?
So lemme see if I have this straight. 11 deaths in Gaza due to intercene warfare between Palestinian factions is "pretty minor". That is a strange rationalization considering the dead Palestinians were gunned down in the street by Palestinian militants.
Have any been arrested? Not on your life. If paramilitary groups were running around Britain executing folks I'm sure the British government wouldn't stand for it for one second.
The PA under Fatah didn't stop it, the PA under Hamas surely refuses to stop it, so the murders continue - that is between the Palestinian rockets and the Palestinian suicide bombers which are endlessly sent into Israel. Welcome to the wonderful world of the Palestinian Authority.
Significant? That will make the second time Abbas has "extended" the plan for statehood that implicitly recognises Israel. Hamas rejected it on May 28th, Hamas rejected it on June 5th and you can bet you life Hamas will reject at the end of this week. How many times does Hamas have to reject a plan that recognizes Israel before Europeans accept that Hamas rejects Israel entirely?
Which brings us back to the OP. The Palestinians own their fate, they own their past, they own their present and they own their future.
It's time to stop rationalizing Palestinian paramilitary violence as the logical result of some outside force - usually Israel/jews/Sharon/settlers/zionism/european colonialists/take your pick.
For there is no outside force in Gaza today that one can use to rationalize Palestinian paramilitary violence anymore.
Israel is still throwing stuff at them from helicopters.
geni proclaims:
Not at "them" --- the IAF is focusing their accurate air-to-ground fire from Apaches and Cobras at specific maniacs who are directly responsible for acts of wanton uncivilized terrorism.
Good riddance, is how I look at it.
And you look at it how, exactly, geni?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/724151.html
Israel offers to fund all medical treatements for Mariya Aman.
Standard attempt at damage limitation.
Outside interference in palistine.
No. Absolutely not. It is unprecedented.
This matter is being handled by the Defense Minister himself, and there has never been an instance (AFAIK) of such an offer.
If you have evidence of your claim "standard attempt", please provide it, geni.
The terrorists, who are targeted by Israeli Defense Forces, have perpetrated henious crimes and the Israeli system allows for these extrajudicial operations, under the existing Emergency Regulations.
"Palestine" as you keep referring to it (spelling corrected), does not exist.
"Palestine" as you keep referring to it (spelling corrected), does not exist.
Neither does western sahara. What of it?
My point, geni, was that the Israeli Army is engaged in stopping and eliminating specific people who they know are engaged in terror acts being perpetrated against Israelis, so it is not "outside interference" ---- the Israelis have defined targets who are legitimately wanted for their involvement of murder and attempted murder against Israeli citizens.
That they happen to be in Gaza or the West Bank is irrelevant. Those areas are not "safe havens" for terrorists, AFAIK.
And those areas will never be safe havens for terrorists, even after the Palestinians form their own State of Palestine.
Get it?
Israel's legal situation is complex and I don't pretend to know too much about it, but the Emergency Regulations provide wide latitude in dealing with enemies who are at war.
The actions of the IDF in disputed territories do not fall directly under the criminal laws of Israeli jurisprudence.
Israel is not treating the Palestinian Authority as a de-facto independent area.
Where did you come up with that idea?
They(Israelis) do not recognise any other government as having control over that area.
Some people will make any excuse to deny the Palestinian ownership of Palestinian paramilitary violence. Often it is the "settlers" or the "checkpoints" or "Sharons visit to the temple mount" or "likud's policies" or "Israel's expasionism" to rationalize Palestinian paramilitary violence. Hell, Geni is trying to dissassociate the Palestinian Authority's ownership over it's own territory.Sure they do, indeed. The Palestinian Authority is the legal and recognized government, of those autonomous areas. They just don't have sovereignty.
(emphasis mine)6/8/2006
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip Jun 8, 2006 (AP)— The Hamas-led government's 3,000-member private militia showed no signs of withdrawing from Gaza's streets Thursday despite a deal with the rival Fatah movement to remove it from public areas.
The government agreed to pull back its militia in the Egyptian-mediated agreement Wednesday aimed at halting weeks of bloody infighting.
Guns over food. Go figure.6/8/2006
RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's forces and Hamas rivals are expanding their arsenals as a power struggle intensifies, increasing the risk that a showdown could turn bloody, security sources and diplomats said.
New weapons and equipment can be seen on the streets of Gaza and the
West Bank, while prices for black market guns and ammunition have soared in a growing arms race despite pledges by both sides to prevent civil war.
In the West Bank, Hamas has been buying M-16 rifles. Dealers said heavy demand and a lack of supply have sent prices soaring to as much as $13,000 each, up from $5,400 a year ago.