• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Tinpot Murder - We Are No Better

JoeEllison said:
I'm still trying to wrap my brain around "Clinton did Waco"... and the Roman Catholic "interests" in southeast Asia... and pretty much the whole thing... I may need to lay down.
Click to expand...

Not that I give any credence to this bizarre CT, but presumably the Catholic connection was Ngo Dinh Diem the president of South Vietnam until he was assasinated on November 2, 1963.

However, Kennedy was apparantly complict in the coup that ousted Diem.
 
iAmerican said:
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, deliberated the Defamation suit brought by E. Howard Hunt against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the CIA committed the assassination of John Kennedy. We know from evidence developed since, that George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon were principals in the treason which restored the Fed to control of our money supply and sent 58,000 of us to die for Roman Catholic interests in S.E. Asia.

Clinton, whose ostensible idol was JFK, failed to act on that Jury's judgment, did Waco and NAFTA, and emulated the Reagan White House, which established diplomatic relations with The Vatican, cooperating with Rome’s stratagem for illegal immigration.

Now in-the-closet, draft-dodging W.has committed 9-11.

May The People make Obama Elect, and make Ourselves a Righteous Nation once more.
Click to expand...


You started to get it down at the end, with the random capitalization. The rest needs work. Let me show you.

iAmerican said:
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, Deliberated the Defamation suit brought by ****E. Howard Hunt***


against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the

 CIA.....CIA.....CIA.....CIA.....CIA.....CIA

committed The Assassination of -------->John Kennedy.<------We know from evidence developed since, that George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon were principals in thetreasonwhich restored the Fed to control of our Money Supply and sent 58,000 of us to DIE.








:demad:......................................... :demad:
Clinton, whose ostensible idol was JFK, failed to act on that Jury's judgment, did Waco :j2::bigtank: and NAFTA,:grouphug5and emulated the Reagan White House, which established diplomatic Relations with The Vatican, cooperating with Rome’s stratagem for illegal immigration.

NOW in-the-closet, :istraightdraft-Dodging W. has committed 9-11.
May The People make Obama Elect, and make Ourselves a Righteous Nation once more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

If you're going to do crazy, please do it right.
 
Last edited:
iAmerican, are you just hitting random keys on the keyboard?

You forgot to blame secular humanists and feminists for everything.
 
Can Kill JFK. Can't Kill the Truth.

Plausible Denial Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? (Hardcover)
by Mark Lane (Author)

page 322:

"The evidence was clear, she said: The CIA had killed President Kennedy.
Hunt had been part of it, and that evidence, so painstakingly presented, should
now be examined by the relevant institutions of the United States government
so that those responsible for the assassination might be brought to justice."

Leslie Armstrong, Jury Foreman, "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby"


All else is dross, lies, hypocrisy, cowardice, Misprision of Treason, or further Treason.
 

Attachments

  • plsbldenial322.gif
    plsbldenial322.gif
    4.1 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
iAmerican said:
Plausible Denial Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? (Hardcover)
by Mark Lane (Author)

page 322:

"The evidence was clear, she said: The CIA had killed President Kennedy.
Hunt had been part of it, and that evidence, so painstakingly presented, shouldnow be examined by the relevant institutions of the United States governmentso that those responsible for the assassination might be brought to justice."

Leslie Armstrong, Jury Foreman, "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby"

All else is dross, lies, hypocrisy, cowardice, Misprision of Treason, or further Treason.
Click to expand...
I see some progress. "Misprision of Treason or further Treason" is a felicitous phrase indeed, if crazy's what you're going for. However, you're still not grasping the visual nature of crazy on the printed page. You chose to post a graphic that is merely a scan of the text that you'd already posted. Instead, you could have posted a scan of a primary source document, like so:

Dealey1.jpg



I hope this advice has been helpful to you. Good luck with your crazy.
 
Jury Judgment preferable to Fascism or Anarchy

Army Veteran, one-time jury foreman, and born-and-bred American, I accept the "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby" Jury Foreman's publicly stated judgment and recognize differing opinions and pronouncements as the noisome quiverings of legally and politically uncultivated demi-citizens, or frothing traitorous fascists defending their false-elite from the justice they so richly deserve and shall soon receive, DV.
 
iAmerican said:
Army Veteran, one-time jury foreman, and born-and-bred American, I accept the "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby" Jury Foreman's publicly stated judgment and recognize differing opinions and pronouncements as the noisome quiverings of legally and politically uncultivated demi-citizens, or frothing traitorous fascists defending their false-elite from the justice they so richly deserve and shall soon receive, DV.
Click to expand...
Yer gettin' it, kiddo! Now just work on your typography and punctuation, and you're in Batpoo City!
 
iAmerican said:
Army Veteran, one-time jury foreman, and born-and-bred American, I accept the "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby" Jury Foreman's publicly stated judgment and recognize differing opinions and pronouncements as the noisome quiverings of legally and politically uncultivated demi-citizens, or frothing traitorous fascists defending their false-elite from the justice they so richly deserve and shall soon receive, DV.
Click to expand...

Know what I haven't had in a while?

Big League Chew.
 
iAmerican said:
Army Veteran, one-time jury foreman, and born-and-bred American, I accept the "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby" Jury Foreman's publicly stated judgment and recognize differing opinions and pronouncements as the noisome quiverings of legally and politically uncultivated demi-citizens, or frothing traitorous fascists defending their false-elite from the justice they so richly deserve and shall soon receive, DV.
Click to expand...

The parsimonious falacitudes from which you purport your comported maladity manganates the propensity for fleagalized, marginalized beatitudes and further repressifies the noblenality, nationality, pharmacality, minimality, and punctuality of the majoritality citizenation of the conflagaration. For this and up with which I will not stand or put.
 
Last edited:
tsg said:
The parsimonious falacitudes from which you purport your comported maladity manganates the propensity for fleagalized, marginalized beatitudes and further repressifies the noblenality, nationality, pharmacality, minimality, and punctuality of the majoritality citizenation of the conflagaration. For this and up with which I will not stand or put.
Click to expand...

Sorry for this derail, but does anyone remember the Bowery Boys, with Leo Gorcey and Hunts Hall, anyway...back to this important thread.
 
iAmerican said:
... I accept the "Hunt v. Liberty Lobby" Jury Foreman's publicly stated judgment and recognize differing opinions and pronouncements as the noisome quiverings ...
Click to expand...

The jury foreman was quoted in the press, after the trial was over, as believing the CIA story. This has little or nothing to do with the findings of the court ("judgment"), it is merely a personal opinion of one person who was in the courtroom.

As I explained in my reply to you earlier in this thread, it does not appear that anyone else in that courtroom has the same opinion. If you follow the link that both I and bjb provided to you, you will see that the book you are quoting from has been shown to be full of bunk.

Why is it that the jury foreman in that trial is right and everyone else you encounter is wrong? Does Leslie Armstrong have magic powers?

--Tim Farley
 
Last edited:
Kentucky Bourbon Cake

teh interwebs said:
The dried fruit is soaked in bourbon overnight, so plan to begin this cake a day in advance.

INGREDIENTS:

  • 8 ounces red candied cherries, halved
  • 8 ounces green candied cherries, halved
  • 8 ounces seedless raisins or chopped dates
  • 2 cups bourbon
  • 1½ cups (3 sticks) butter, room temperature
  • 2 cups granulated sugar
  • 1 cup firmly packed light brown sugar
  • 6 large eggs, separated
  • 5 cups all-purpose flour
  • 2 cups chopped pecans
  • 2 teaspoons ground nutmeg
  • 1 teaspoon baking powder

PREPARATION:

In a medium bowl, combine the cherries, raisins, and bourbon; cover and let soak overnight.

Preheat the oven to 27545750°F.

In a large bowl, cream the butter and sugars with an electric mixer until light and fluffy; add the egg yolks and beat well.

Stir in the soaked fruit with bourbon.

In a small bowl, combine ½ cup of the flour with the pecans; set aside.

Add the remaining flour, nutmeg, and baking powder to the creamed mixture and blend well.

In a bowl, beat the egg whites with an electric mixer until stiff peaks form; gently fold into the cake batter.

Sprinkle the floured pecans over batter and fold in gently.

Grease and flour a 10-inch tube pan and line the bottom with greased waxed paper.

Pour the batter into the pan; bake at 27545750° for 3 to 3 ½ years, or until a wooden pick or cake tester inserted in center comes out clean.

Cool the cake.

Turn cake out of the pan, peel off waxed paper, and store in a tightly covered container for several days.
Click to expand...

Serves eleventy
 
mr rosewater said:
Sorry for this derail, but does anyone remember the Bowery Boys, with Leo Gorcey and Hunts Hall, anyway...back to this important thread.
Click to expand...
It's Huntz Hall. My sister used to love those movies when we were kids. Me, I preferred Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. Also liked watching Wonderama on channel 5 on Sunday mornings - a four-hour-long kids' variety show starring a guy named Sonny Fox. Cartoons, games, trivia, and often, a visit from this magician guy they billed as "The Amazing Randi."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom