• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Tinpot Murder - We Are No Better

iAmerican

Thinker
iAmerican
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
196
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, deliberated the Defamation suit brought by E. Howard Hunt against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the CIA committed the assassination of John Kennedy. We know from evidence developed since, that George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon were principals in the treason which restored the Fed to control of our money supply and sent 58,000 of us to die for Roman Catholic interests in S.E. Asia.

Clinton, whose ostensible idol was JFK, failed to act on that Jury's judgment, did Waco and NAFTA, and emulated the Reagan White House, which established diplomatic relations with The Vatican, cooperating with Rome’s stratagem for illegal immigration.

Now in-the-closet, draft-dodging W. has committed 9-11.

May The People make Obama Elect, and make Ourselves a Righteous Nation once more.
 
I thought you were serious, till I got to the Righteous Nation bit, that's really creative and funny.
 
iAmerican said:
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, deliberated the Defamation suit brought by E. Howard Hunt against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the CIA committed the assassination of John Kennedy. We know from evidence developed since, that George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon were principals in the treason which restored the Fed to control of our money supply and sent 58,000 of us to die for Roman Catholic interests in S.E. Asia.

Clinton, whose ostensible idol was JFK, failed to act on that Jury's judgment, did Waco and NAFTA, and emulated the Reagan White House, which established diplomatic relations with The Vatican, cooperating with Rome’s stratagem for illegal immigration.

Now in-the-closet, draft-dodging W. has committed 9-11.

May The People make Obama Elect, and make Ourselves a Righteous Nation once more.
Click to expand...
From what you posted, you died for Roman Catholic interests in S.E. Asia. That means you sent us this message from beyond the grave.

Mr Randi's million appears to be available to you, or to me and everyone else for receiving your message.

Cool. I need a new set of clubs.

DR
 
Last edited:
Betting people:

How much longer do you think this post stays here?

Where does it go?

3 to 1 Abandon All hope (its some off the wall rambling straight off the bat)

3 to 2 Conspiracy Theories (thats what he is rambling about)
 
Somehow I think that Obama is not exactly thrilled to have a nutjob like this for a supporter.
 
You forgot the bit about "the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the reverse vampires ..."

HTH HAND
 
Last edited:
Oy.

Michael
 

Attachments

  • 300px-Train_wreck_at_Montparnasse_1895.jpg
    300px-Train_wreck_at_Montparnasse_1895.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 11
I'm still trying to wrap my brain around "Clinton did Waco"... and the Roman Catholic "interests" in southeast Asia... and pretty much the whole thing... I may need to lay down.
 
Pretty funny stuff! This site:

http://www.publiceye.org/rightwoo/rwooz9-09.html

uses the same information about E. Howard Hunt and his lawsuit but with the conclusion it proved that Jews were behind the Vietnam war! Here's some information on Spotlight, the publication referred to in the original post.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spotlight

I think it is amusing that someone uses an anti-Semetic publication as a source of anti-Catholic propaganda.

Here's a link to a debunking of the idea that the lawsuit 'proved' the CIA killed Kennedy:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/denial.htm

Essentially, the jury decided the publication did not act with malice, so Spotlight prevailed in the defamation lawsuit.
 
A Righteous Nation? Why even bother jumping thru hoops just to make God happy? If I could direct a 2-mile wide asteroid into Earth to spite Yahweh, I would.
 
iAmerican said:
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, deliberated the Defamation suit brought by E. Howard Hunt against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the CIA committed the assassination of John Kennedy. We know from evidence developed since, that George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon were principals in the treason which restored the Fed to control of our money supply and sent 58,000 of us to die for Roman Catholic interests in S.E. Asia.

Clinton, whose ostensible idol was JFK, failed to act on that Jury's judgment, did Waco and NAFTA, and emulated the Reagan White House, which established diplomatic relations with The Vatican, cooperating with Rome’s stratagem for illegal immigration.

Now in-the-closet, draft-dodging W. has committed 9-11.

May The People make Obama Elect, and make Ourselves a Righteous Nation once more.
Click to expand...

Hi iAmerican. Excellent post. Excellent capitalizations. Is it a poem?
 
bjb said:
Pretty funny stuff! This site:

http://www.publiceye.org/rightwoo/rwooz9-09.html

uses the same information about E. Howard Hunt and his lawsuit but with the conclusion it proved that Jews were behind the Vietnam war! Here's some information on Spotlight, the publication referred to in the original post.
Click to expand...

OMG! That proves Nixon and HW to be Jews! Take that Christian Right, I think.
 
iAmerican said:
In 1985, a Federal Dist. Court Jury, deliberated the Defamation suit brought by E. Howard Hunt against the publisher Liberty Lobby, determining that the CIA committed the assassination of John Kennedy.
Click to expand...

That's a bit of stretch, to put it mildly. Hunt's defamation suit failed not because the article was accurate, but because the jury found neither "reckless disregard for the truth" nor "actual malice", two key principles of U.S. libel law in regard to public figures like Hunt.

Yes, the jury foreperson Leslie Armstrong seemed to believe CIA killed Kennedy, but the rest of the jurors did not.

From this article:
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/denial.htm

Armstrong apparently did say that, and doubtless believed it. But there were five other jurors. Two of them told the Miami Herald that they most certainly did not believe that Lane had proven that Hunt was a conspirator. Suzanne Reach said that “We were very disgusted and felt it was trash . . . . The paper published material that was sloppy – but it wasn’t malicious.” Reach added that “We were worried that our verdict might give the wrong impression to the public” and added that Lane’s conspiracy theories were “absolutely not” the reason for the verdict.

The Herald also quoted another juror, who refused to be identified, saying that the verdict was the result of Hunt failing to demonstrate that the article was published with “reckless disregard for the truth,” and added that Lane’s conspiracy theories were “so much extraneous matter.”

Likewise, an unidentified juror told the Associated Press that (in the words of the AP reporter) “no evidence was presented showing malice toward Hunt by the publication.” Finally, juror L. L. Cobb told United Press that the jury was concerned about whether the article was damaging to Hunt, not whether it was true. Quoting the UPI story:

“What we looked at was the article and whether there was any instances of malice,” she said. “We did not find any because there had been many stories written about the issue.”

Thus, depending on whether the unidentified juror in the Miami Herald story is the same person as the juror quoted by the Associated Press, three or four of the six jurors went on record as denying Lane’s claims to have proven a conspiracy.
Click to expand...

I have a hard time making any sense of the rest of your original post, so I'll leave it at that.

--Tim Farley

ETA: Ooops, I didn't see bjb's post before I wrote this.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom