• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Time to kick Iran

Would you have favored helping the Nazis get nuclear technology in 1930 if it were available, Oliver?


If they would allow IAEA inspectors like Iran does? Yes.
Iran has the right to have nuclear power as long they
agree to the IAEA-Rules. That's the deal of the IAEA treaty.

Anything else is whining.

Do you have evidence that Iran isn't obeying to the IAEA-Rules? :rolleyes:
 
The only country in history who EVER dropped a nuclear bomb
on civilians .... is .... surprise, surprise ..... the US.

Random anti-American sentiment that has absolutely no point. Well... if it is your fix for the night... but a beer will do better.

Yes, the same guys who are whining about a legal Powerplant
in Iran. Wow, what a hypocrisy, isn't it? :rolleyes:

Maybe it could be seen as that. Does it have anything to do with my previous post?

ANYWAY:

Your evidence that Iran is/or will start a nuclear weapons program
is WHAT? GAY-RIGHTS???? :rolleyes:

You know I am talking full well about your claim there is no threat. Despite the fact that you agree with everything I said about the threat of a hypothetical Bush toward American gays.

Or do you value a 'threat' as simply being a big boom with lots of fireworks? Do you think a country only puts a region in danger when it fires a nuke into the air, and is a blessing of peace when it is locked in the silo?

ETA: Everyone who has just picked up here, go back a few pages, it will help you get a very fashionable and deep row of fingernail marks on the inside of your hands. Get the new look here, while it lasts!
 
Last edited:
Randomn anti-American sentiment that has absolutely no point. Well... if it is your fix for the night... but a beer will do better.

Maybe it could be seen as that. Does it have anything to do with my previous post?

You know I am talking full well about your claim there is no threat. Despite the fact that you agree with everything I said about the threat of a hypothetical Bush toward American gays.

Or do you value a 'threat' as simply being a big boom with lots of fireworks?


A H M A D E N I J A D I S N ' T I N C O N T R O L O F
T H E N U C L E A R P O W E R P L A N T . . .

D O Y O U U N D E R S T A N D ? :rolleyes::boggled:
 
Do you have evidence that Iran isn't obeying to the IAEA-Rules? :rolleyes:
Why yes, as a matter of fact.
Fourth, while the Agency so far has been unable to verify certain important aspects relevant to the scope and nature of Iran´s nuclear programme, Iran and the Secretariat agreed last month on a work plan for resolving all outstanding verification issues. These verification issues are at the core of the lack of confidence about the nature of Iran´s programme, and are what prompted actions by the Security Council. Iran´s agreement on such a work plan, with a defined timeline, is therefore an important step in the right direction. Naturally, Iran´s active cooperation and transparency is the key to full and timely implementation of the work plan. If the Agency were able to provide credible assurance about the peaceful nature of Iran´s past and current nuclear programme, this would go a long way towards building confidence about Iran´s nuclear programme, and could create the conditions for a comprehensive and durable solution.
Unless you call "a step in the right direction" full compliance. :rolleyes:
 
A H M A D E N I J A D I S N ' T I N C O N T R O L O F
T H E N U C L E A R P O W E R P L A N T . . .

D O Y O U U N D E R S T A N D ? :rolleyes::boggled:
N O O N E H A S A I D H E W A S , A N D
I T D O E S N ' T M A T T E R . . .

D O Y O U U N D E R S T A N D ?
 
Where was "Teh Threat" when Hitler was building power in the mid-30's? I suppose you would have advocated nuclear power for the Nazis as well. After all they were following the "rules."

Please, do not compare the situation of Germany in the 30s, with Iran in the 00s.
Totally different
 
The only country in history who EVER dropped a nuclear bomb
on civilians .... is .... surprise, surprise ..... the US.

Yes, the same guys who are whining about a legal Powerplant
in Iran. Wow, what a hypocrisy, isn't it? :rolleyes:

Please, do not compare the situation between the US and Japan in 1945, with the problems between US and Iran in 2007.
Totally different story
 
Please, do not compare the situation between the US and Japan in 1945, with the problems between US and Iran in 2007.
Totally different story


Well, what's the threat for the US since they're all
crapping in their pants about Irans nuclear intentions
since Iran is playing to the IAEA-Rules and don't want
anything but their right to have nuclear-energy...

Where is the evidence that IRAN want's nukes???

Care to explain it to me? :confused:
 
A H M A D E N I J A D I S N ' T I N C O N T R O L O F
T H E N U C L E A R P O W E R P L A N T . . .

D O Y O U U N D E R S T A N D ? :rolleyes::boggled:

W H Y W I L L Y O U N O T A N S W E R A N Y O F M Y P O I N T S A N D I N S T E A D R E L Y O N Y O U R O L D F R I E N D M R U P T U R N E D L I P?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: O H H... T H A T F E L T G O O D. L E T S U S E H I M A G A I N.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: O N E M O R E T I M E?:rolleyes:
 
You know I am talking full well about your claim there is no threat. Despite the fact that you agree with everything I said about the threat of a hypothetical Bush toward American gays.

Or do you value a 'threat' as simply being a big boom with lots of fireworks? Do you think a country only puts a region in danger when it fires a nuke into the air, and is a blessing of peace when it is locked in the silo?

Again, answer Oliver.
 
W H Y W I L L Y O U N O T A N S W E R A N Y O F M Y P O I N T S A N D I N S T E A D R E L Y O N Y O U R O L D F R I E N D M R U P T U R N E D L I P?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: O H H... T H A T F E L T G O O D. L E T S U S E H I M A G A I N.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: O N E M O R E T I M E?:rolleyes:

Again, answer Oliver.


No. I'm not willing to answer you anything anymore until
you answer my question as well... :

What's the threat for the United States of 10,000 Nukes???? :confused:
 
U N I T E D - S T A T E S - O F - C O W A R D S . . .
scared002.gif
scared003.gif
scared001.gif
scared004.gif
scared007.gif
 
No. I'm not willing to answer you anything anymore until
you answer my question as well... :

What's the threat for the United States of 10,000 Nukes???? :confused:

Ok then.

If a country has a nuclear weapon, history has told us it is sometimes more of a threat in a untouched missile silo then flying toward a city.

Now will you answer mine?
 
Oliver, do you seriously believe that calling names and including silly smilies is effective rhetorical technique?

If so, just let me answer all your posts by saying, "Poopyhead!" :spno::sppissedoff::spunhappy_green::spunhappy:
:sppissedoff::spangry:
 
Oliver, do you seriously believe that calling names and including silly smilies is effective rhetorical technique?

If so, just let me answer all your posts by saying, "Poopyhead!" :spno::sppissedoff::spunhappy_green::spunhappy:
:sppissedoff::spangry:


My point still is:

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR IRAN TRYING TO POSSESS NUCLEAR
WEAPONS. OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T AGREE TO THE IAEA TREATY
AND THEIR INSPECTORS... :rolleyes:

And your Woo-BibleStudying-BS-SylviaBrown-Evidence is..... :rolleyes:

What the F is your evidence?

Let me repeat it for the Nut-Case-Skeptics in here:

What the F is your evidence? :rolleyes:
 
What's the threat for the United States of 10,000 Nukes???? :confused:

Nobody in the world feels threatened by the possibility of the US using nuclear weapons in a first strike against them. Nobody. Not even Saddam when we were heading towards Baghdad.

I used to just think you were ignorant, but you're far more than that. You're deliberately blind.
 
What did I say about shouting, Oliver? And it's a small mind which can't make it's point without resorting to profanity.
 
What did I say about shouting, Oliver? And it's a small mind which can't make it's point without resorting to profanity.
As a coping mechanism, I picture Oliver as that angry German kid of youtube fame. :D
 
Well, what's the threat for the US since they're all
crapping in their pants about Irans nuclear intentions
since Iran is playing to the IAEA-Rules and don't want
anything but their right to have nuclear-energy...

Where is the evidence that IRAN want's nukes???

Care to explain it to me? :confused:

Oliver,
I did not say that there is evidence that Iran wants nukes.
I just said:
Please, do not compare the situation between the US and Japan in 1945, with the problems between US and Iran in 2007.
 

Back
Top Bottom