This is not the April Stundie nomination thread

read the premise again

"All odd numbers are prime"


if the definition of prime is a number divisible by 1 and itself then the question is whether or not "1" satisfies the definition


Not if the definition continues "... except for 1" or contains the phrase "an integer greater than 1".

Hint: 1 is not prime.
 
The Government of Manitoba is trying to make children look like demons:
http://www.henrymakow.com/mixed_message_from_family_serv.html

The Freemasons and feminists who seem to run the Manitoba government have plastered literally every convenience store in the province with these 4x8-foot posters purporting to provide resources for parents. It is also on the side of city buses.

But the poster features a child who looks satanically possessed, making parenthood something to be avoided.

Just as these feminist bureaucrats measure marriage in terms of domestic abuse, they deliberately portray children as evil urchins.

It's fitting that the "world's toughest job" campaign comes from the Manitoba Dept. of Labor and Family Services.
 
Doctors are against euthinasia because it would "lose them money":
http://dissention.wordpress.com/201...uthanasia-because-it-would-hurt-their-income/

Most rational people understand that prolonging the life of an ill person to the point that it causes considerable suffering without any hope of recovery is not desirable and doing so is effectively torture. So why are physicians around the world, but especially in anglo-saxon countries, so opposed to euthanasia?

The standard and official explanation is that physicians look out for the best interests of their patients and want to protect them from harm. However medical errors, obvious misdiagnosis, negligence and other forms of medical malpractice are officially the 4th leading cause of death. Therefore the ‘ we are protecting patients’ line seems a bit hollow.

An alternative explanation is that patients with chronic and hard-to-treat diseases are cash cows, and the cost of specialized care and treatments of dubious efficacy are the major source of income for physicians.

Access to easy euthanasia would cause a considerable reduction in the income of many physicians. For most of them the specter of reduced income outweighs any consideration of the patients quality of life or suffering.
 
Women driving leads to the death of nations:
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012...ealth-power-and-confidence.html#comment-37868

I can remember 30 years ago when this down hill slide started. Women were criticizing men for be “macho” while they (women) were enrolling “assertiveness training” classes. Today we see more macho female heroes in movies than men. I drive down the street and 9 times out of 10 when I see a man and a woman in a car the woman is driving. They look like little boys riding with their mommies. There was a time not long ago that most men wouldn’t be caught dead letting a woman control their physical life. Just another symptom of how passive men have become.

Their may a good reason why all these environmental influences seem to be effecting men this way. I would say the powers that be know that once a nation loses it’s masculine core, it will not be able to survive.
 
I would love to see what he'd say about me buying my wife a motorcycle.

Not only did I buy my wife a Soft Tail Deluxe, she's been selected to be a motorcycle instructor. I wonder what he'd say to that[/]?

(Not to mention that I won't get on a motorcycle - they scare me. That's why I'm a flight instructor....)
 
To analyze why a building collapsed you don't need to analyze any period of time before the collapse. The fact that it's on fire, leading, has a big chunk missing - "fluff."
I do know that A has to get damaged and have the physical force to damage B....................... and CC has the physical force to damage CD............
LL has the physical force to damage LM.......................RV has the physical force to damage RW................................ZZZZY has the physical force to damage ZZZZZ.


You are ignoring the fact that period leading up to the so called "collapse" is of no consequence in developing a simulation.

All that has to be done is to get the building to completely fail in about 10 seconds using unlimited application(s) of FORCE that causes damage.



All the lead up data/effects are merely fluff.
After you get the building to fail in the simulation you then determine the source(s) of the force(s) on 9/11.
 
Doctors are against euthinasia because it would "lose them money":
http://dissention.wordpress.com/201...uthanasia-because-it-would-hurt-their-income/

Lovely, reminds me of the person who told me that my doctor "gave" me cancer in order to line his pockets. This simplistic view ignores several facts; the doctor who first found it was my G.P. who thereafter had no role in my treatment thus not making him any money at all other than the visit I arranged due to my noticing a troubling symptom, that both my G.P. and the specialists I saw all have so many patients that there is a waiting list and unless your case is urgent you wait up to two months to get an appointment(which would suggest they really did not need to add me to the list), and finally that all the doctors I saw are paid by gov't medical insurance and must provide docuementation of the requirement to treat a patient(which would then require complicity of the gov't bureaucrats as well).
 
Lovely, reminds me of the person who told me that my doctor "gave" me cancer in order to line his pockets. This simplistic view ignores several facts; the doctor who first found it was my G.P. who thereafter had no role in my treatment thus not making him any money at all other than the visit I arranged due to my noticing a troubling symptom, that both my G.P. and the specialists I saw all have so many patients that there is a waiting list and unless your case is urgent you wait up to two months to get an appointment(which would suggest they really did not need to add me to the list), and finally that all the doctors I saw are paid by gov't medical insurance and must provide docuementation of the requirement to treat a patient(which would then require complicity of the gov't bureaucrats as well).


Yeah, this "They did it for the money" claim is common to all sorts of woo. It seems there's nothing so dastardly that entire industries won't all cooperate to continue it if there's money to be made.

Just this week I was working on a patent application for a woo device to "deactivate" radioactive materials. In researching the topic, I found a wonderfully crackpot site that claimed they'd done the same thing back in the 60s, but people were making too much money off just storing nuclear waste to support their work :rolleyes:
 
How to design a skyskraper without really trying

Clayton Moore tells us:

How do you think the plans for new skyscraper are reviewed and analyzed to determine if the building will be safe? They determine the amount force the building might/would incur over many years, Rain, wind, damaged infrastructure, fire, planes hitting the building and on and on and on. What if,
what if,
what if,
what if,
what if.

Then they build the building much stronger.

Then they run stress simulations to prevent oversights.
 
read the premise again

"All odd numbers are prime"


if the definition of prime is a number divisible by 1 and itself then the question is whether or not "1" satisfies the definition
d'oh :blush:

I've decided to collect a few more conspiratorial gems from the RickSantorum-2012 tumblr:

the-real-heroin-bob asked: what will you do when obama wins again?

Honestly? I don’t even know……. I really don’t even know at this point what I would do is Obama wins. I seriously fear it would be the end. We can only hope Obama will do less damage the 2nd time around… but the truth is, he will go all out. He will legalize gay marriage, cut all funding to Israel, support Islamism, oppress Christians……… I don’t know what I’ll do, but I’ll tell you what I WILL not do which is sit back idly as my country is taken over!!!
(source)

louis-andhis-mustache asked: How do you feel about Harry Potter? :3

Witchcraft.
(sauce)

Democrats are no longer Christian. I see no reason to debate it. Social(ist) justice and collective(ist) salvation are in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ. Being a Democrat means actively undermining Christ’s teachings. In recent years it has gone beyond even that to accept an openly anti-Christian agenda that seeks to destroy the religion from within and without. Democrat(Leftist) “Christians”, whether deliberately or through indoctrination, are members of a cult. That cult is the cult of Marx. The cult of Marx places itself in all ways above Christ, and is ultimately anti-Christ. The only question is whether they are a minion or complicit.

As members of the Marxist religion they do not care, they can not care, about any of the three above. 1) They spend their own lives in the same lie so are incapable of judging him adversely for it. 2) They agree with most of it as well. 3) They’ve been doing the same thing throughout their lives. This all being the case, Democrats are going to give a pass to Obama for Wright’s hate speech even if recordings appear of Obama preaching the sermon himself.
(SARS)

askforthemoon asked: Everything on your blog is the complete opposite of my opinion, and does make me quite angry. And disappointed, actually. So I won't go there. But can I ask why you don't believe in evolution? Do you take the Bible literally? And how do you explain things like fossils? Hope this is ok.

Opinions make you angry? Too funny.

Anyway, the fossils were planted by scientists who are anti-Christian. And no, evolution is a flawed theory. I believe in creationism. And yes I do think most of the bible can be taken literally with some obvious exceptions.
(SEARS)
 

Back
Top Bottom