• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This amuses me muchly.

Gravy

Downsitting Citizen
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
17,078
There's a guy who thinks I'm the same person who appears at about 3:15 in the video 911 Mysteries and describes the impact of flight 175 and the collapse of a tower. I've told this guy that I do not appear in that video, but he questioned me again about it. For comparison, it's the guy on the left he's talking about, and me below:

87904593ae6e0da83.jpg


87904593ae6e5d3a4.jpg


Now, I don't look like this guy. I'm probably much taller, 10 years older, I have a prominent nose, no lips to speak of, non-bushy eyebrows, and a distinctive birthmark on my right cheek, all qualities that the guy being interviewed doesn't share. So there's that.

I also sound nothing like this guy. Nothing at all.

This wouldn't be worthy of comment, except the person claiming that it's me or a lookalike is Rick Siegel, the creator of 9/11 Eyewitness, which is all about...video and audio analysis.
Siegel: "Roberts, who is famous for allegedly being the agent in the beginning of the 911 Mysteries video compilation then took the stage and showed the kids how a real agent can take control.'

I told him I wasn't in that video.

"So, you are sure you are not the guy in the first interview on 911mysteries? Twin brother? You sure look and talk like him."
Here's the kicker: Siegel says he's seen me several times at Ground Zero and has even filmed me, so it's not as if he doesn't have anything to compare:

I have seen you many times down at ground zero. We are watching you as carefully, or more so, than they watch me. I even have you on film. When I am ready I will take you aside. You have nothing to fear. You have already been played and it did not hurt a bit did it? In fact you did not even notice it and thought you were actually doing something. That is the beauty of it all.
Could these people possibly be any less competent, and any more paranoid?

Oh, and Rick invited me on a special outing!

I was trying to get all the people in the 911scholars to take lie detector tests and do hypnosis. That is when Jones freaked out and tossed me out of their forum. This would at least whittle down those whose “works” have little mettle. How would you like to go along with me, and some of the others from both sides, for that outing? Even I want to see what I remember that is either blocked or forgotten from that day. Can you imagine how much trust you and others would gain? What better proof of truth? I have no fear of it.
ARE YOU KIDDING? I WOULDN'T MISS THAT FOR ALL THE TEA IN CHINA! AS LONG AS I GET TO FILM IT!

Rick Siegel has been asked to be on the Board of Directors of the new 911 Scholars for Truth corporation. He is entirely worthy of that honor.
After some recent atrocities committed by a confused and befuddled Professor Jones over the weekend, the powers at the Scholars for 911 Truth have asked Rick Siegel to please join the board of directors for the newly formed Scholars for 911 Truth corporation.

This has not been done without controversy and the controversy will grow, as the kind professor Jones has demanded an Organization and forum without the "powerful and wily Siegel."
I encourage you to visit his 911 Researchers forum for a taste of his powerful arguments and wily ways. You won't be able to stop laughing. Oh, wait...that forum appears to be only about me and Ron Wieck. Do they have a team working on us?

:dl:


 
Last edited:
doesn't he appear at the beginning of his mysteries video? Or am I mixing up woowoos?
 
I just find it really amusing how they call this guy an 'agent'.

For starters they know absolutely nothing about him. This guy may very well have experience in the field. He may be an engineer of some sort, ex-firefighter or similar.

I couldn't bring that up in "Screw 9/11 Mysteries" though because they don't make the direct assertion that this guy is an agent. Although they do seem to strongly hint at it.

But really... Gravy? It looks nothing like him and talks nothing like him. Gravy's voice is a lot more subtle and he's got less of an accent in my opinion.

Does anyone know where the original footage of this can be found? I've only seen it on Mysteries.
 
Ah, that's cheered me right up!

Now, to go and pursue 28th wherever he is........
 
Well, the genius Siegel noticed the secret giveaway:

View attachment 4757

That composite photo reveals more than you think. Look at the text you have captured in the picture you have inserted into the one of Gravy confronting Alex Jones. It clearly says "ME" (in note that the last vertical line of the M is also the vertical line of the E, an old Illuminti trick), which proves that not only is it Gravy in both images, but that you are Gravy too!
You get about a bit, don't you? :P
 
Now, I don't look like this guy. I'm probably much taller, 10 years older, I have a prominent nose, no lips to speak of, non-bushy eyebrows, and a distinctive birthmark on my right cheek, all qualities that the guy being interviewed doesn't share. So there's that.
I can prove that the birthmark is fake. Here's an almost-identical image of you:

shill.jpg


What's wrong with this picture? Got your starboard confused with your port that day, did you?

Are those platform shoes comfortable, shill?

Typical. JREFers can't see an obvious agent in disguise any better than they can see an obvious fake Osama or an obvious controlled demolition designed to look like a natural collapse. :nope:
 
None of these pictures look anything like the gravy in the Supa-Seekrit NWO UK/US webconferences we have.

Mind you, he's usually shifted to lizard by then.

Still has the birthmark tho. Not as visible through the green scales, but it's definitely there.
 
You have to be kidding me

I can prove that the birthmark is fake. Here's an almost-identical image of you:



What's wrong with this picture? Got your starboard confused with your port that day, did you?

Are those platform shoes comfortable, shill?

Typical. JREFers can't see an obvious agent in disguise any better than they can see an obvious fake Osama or an obvious controlled demolition designed to look like a natural collapse. :nope:
You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????
 
also notice anything wrong with this?.....

87484593d56ad27c6.jpg


you wanna get your continuity sorted fella.
proof of a sticky-birthmark swap time window for gravy........

BV
 
You took the picture from the top of he post and changed it's orientation in Photoshop. Can you really be that transparent????
:nope: Wrong...I used The Gimp, not Photoshop.

Welcome to the forum, afinemadness! :w2:

I'm sorry this was the first post of mine that you read. My position on 9/11 CTs is well-established, so the [sarcasm] tags are redundant for most readers.
 

In addition to those dark glasses does Siegel also have a stick and a guide dog cos' that would explain hes photoanalyzing skills. ;) (Notice the smiley indicating that I'm joking...duh)



rolleyes
 
In addition to those dark glasses does Siegel also have a stick and a guide dog cos' that would explain hes photoanalyzing skills. ;) (Notice the smiley indicating that I'm joking...duh)



rolleyes


The dog was just out of shot, which explains that leery grin he has. :boggled:
 

Back
Top Bottom