Merged Things that Bubba finds interesting or newsworthy

That's just your opinion. It's patently untrue and a load of bollocks. It's you who needs help. It seems you have been damaged by your child abuse experiences.

And yet YOU are the one helping to enable real pedophiles by spreading nonsense which pollutes jury pools in future molestation cases.

You are the one making this evil a continued reality, not in your fancy CT/world Pedo-Rings of the rich and powerful, but on the real streets where real predators do their thing.

The crap you spread is the reason nobody believes most victims.

There is a reverse maxim to the CT mind-set of "If A & B are true then X,Y & Z must also be true", and it is "If A&B are confirmed lies then X,Y, & Z are also lies." The problem with both is that they are intellectually lazy. Just because A&B are true or false doesn't mean you don't do due diligence when looking at X,Y, & Z.

Most people are lazy, and after dozens of molestation cases which turn out to be fabricated for ulterior motives society turns a deaf ear. We saw this in the 90's with the "Recovered Memory" nonsense that put hundreds of innocent people behind bars.

I'll name one. President Bush.

YouTube is not fact or credible.
 
And yet YOU are the one helping to enable real pedophiles by spreading nonsense which pollutes jury pools in future molestation cases.

You are the one making this evil a continued reality, not in your fancy CT/world Pedo-Rings of the rich and powerful, but on the real streets where real predators do their thing.

The crap you spread is the reason nobody believes most victims.

There is a reverse maxim to the CT mind-set of "If A & B are true then X,Y & Z must also be true", and it is "If A&B are confirmed lies then X,Y, & Z are also lies." The problem with both is that they are intellectually lazy. Just because A&B are true or false doesn't mean you don't do due diligence when looking at X,Y, & Z.

Most people are lazy, and after dozens of molestation cases which turn out to be fabricated for ulterior motives society turns a deaf ear. We saw this in the 90's with the "Recovered Memory" nonsense that put hundreds of innocent people behind bars.



YouTube is not fact or credible.

That doesn't matter to the poster you're addressing.
 
Why are conspiracy theorists so utterly OBSESSED with finding pedophilia everywhere? I swear, as a concept, it shows up more than scary Jews. And always in the context of "rings."

I am well aware there are pedophiles all over the place in the real world, but these obsessive, constant theories are just creepy to me. People need to get off the net more!

ETA - Especially thee, Bubba. Go outside!

There is one possible explanation.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504080730.htm

Basically, some research suggests that it takes one to know one. People who believe in and support conspiracy theories would themselves do the things they believe others conspire to do.
 
... Most of the erosion here was done by the rushing water, with the most obvious being the near-perfect cylinder holes. Some erosion happened after it was no longer a riverbed and became exposed on the surface as we see now. This would be accomplished now by rain and wind.


My first thought was those are grinding holes.
They're everywhere, though that group would represent very light use.
(There's a wicked cool large group near Jackson, CA. Maybe Travis has seen it. ;) )


Grinding Stones
 
This sound WAY too much like kyoon's Illuminati...

Kyoon isn't the only one - AJ works that angle too.


It's quite common among the CT crowd. While they themselves deny that they believe in magic, they insist that everyone in the Elite/Illuminati/NWO/Whoever do believe in magic, and that such public displays of occult symbology are a part of their rituals.

Of course, it never occurs to the CT crown to wonder why "they" keep doing "magic" if magic isn't real.
 
Who placed the Mystery Rocks of Saskatchewan?
Doesnt look like nature's work. Burial mound, maybe.

http://ryanwunsch.com/mystery-rocks-saskatchewan/

Bubba, I would be interested to know how you arrived at this conclusion.
Is it based on your own expertise in either geology or archaeology?
Did you consult a geologist or an archaeologist?
Have you visited the site yourself?
Given the debate here about what kind of stone this is, have you determined this yourself, and if so, how?
Finally:
Can you guess why I'm asking these questions?
 
It's quite common among the CT crowd. While they themselves deny that they believe in magic, they insist that everyone in the Elite/Illuminati/NWO/Whoever do believe in magic, and that such public displays of occult symbology are a part of their rituals.

Of course, it never occurs to the CT crown to wonder why "they" keep doing "magic" if magic isn't real.

It doesn't matter if the CT believes in magic or not. The claim is that the illuminutty do regardless of whether it works or not or the CT believes in it or not.
 
Look at what you wrote!

:dl:

"I'm not absurdly credulous. I trust what I read in the Mail on Sunday!"

Wonderful.

The Mail on Sunday does some good investigative journalism and it has explained in the past why the UK charity business is the fifth largest business in the UK and why Puerto Rica is now sadly short of roof repairers and dam repairers and why charities have remuneration committees, and why their executives live in luxury houses. This is more from that Mail on Sunday article:

According to Whitehall sources Mr Veale's report will say seven of the alleged victims are 'credible' and describe the same pattern of behaviour by their 'abuser'. A Government source said an 'interview under caution' is in effect, the strongest action that Mr Veale could recommend with regard to Sir Edward.

Part of the trouble is that the victims don't usually come from the articulate classes. They are even in some cases semi-literate. The police just regard them as fruitloops, and child prostitution, particularly in the upper classes, is not part of routine police work.

I fully appreciate that there are false allegations with regard to rape but that's where you need an impartial judge and jury. If all this categorically denying everything goes on there is going to be a Jimmy Savile was innocent campaign.
PHP:


There have been rumours that female mental patients were sexually abused in the past but without mobile phone footage it was difficult to prove. In the 19th century workhouse inmates were cheated out of their food rations but it was categorically denied at the time because the inmates lacked expensive counsel.

The eminent advocate Norman Birkett had a bit to say about this sort of thing with regard to Charles Dickens:

He'd got a knowledge of life, and of the poor, the life of the poor, of all sorts of and conditions of men, and he had what I sometimes call, though I can never quite define it, he had the "common touch".
 
Last edited:
There is a reverse maxim to the CT mind-set of "If A & B are true then X,Y & Z must also be true", and it is "If A&B are confirmed lies then X,Y, & Z are also lies." The problem with both is that they are intellectually lazy. Just because A&B are true or false doesn't mean you don't do due diligence when looking at X,Y, & Z.
This point came to mind when minutes later I read this:
The Mail on Sunday does some good investigative journalism...
 
The Mail on Sunday does some good investigative journalism and it has explained in the past why the UK charity business is the fifth largest business in the UK and why Puerto Rica is now sadly short of roof repairers and dam repairers and why charities have remuneration committees, and why their executives live in luxury houses. This is more from that Mail on Sunday article:



Part of the trouble is that the victims don't usually come from the articulate classes. They are even in some cases semi-literate. The police just regard them as fruitloops, and child prostitution, particularly in the upper classes, is not part of routine police work.

I fully appreciate that there are false allegations with regard to rape but that's where you need an impartial judge and jury. If all this categorically denying everything goes on there is going to be a Jimmy Savile was innocent campaign.
PHP:


There have been rumours that female mental patients were sexually abused in the past but without mobile phone footage it was difficult to prove. In the 19th century workhouse inmates were cheated out of their food rations but it was categorically denied at the time because the inmates lacked expensive counsel.

The eminent advocate Norman Birkett had a bit to say about this sort of thing with regard to Charles Dickens:

The Mail also called the investigation a waste of time.
The Mail also has a long history of objectifying young women, in the sidebar of shame.
The Mail also had Richard Littlejohn, as a columnist, who complained for many years about Winterval, Health and Saftey Gone Mad, and scare stories about moving border controls, without ever troubling his column with facts.
The Mail also tried to divide every known object into those that cause, or prevent, cancer, with many objects in both groups.
The Mail also sad “Huzzah for the Blackshirts”.

None of this is relevant to the article you posted, or it’s accuracy, or more importantly your interpretation.

There was a two year investigation. It found no evidence. Everything you want to believe has been well covered by many papers, and I think there is a fair chance that s Me posters here probably read Private Eye, and may have been following the story for decades.
 
My first thought was those are grinding holes.
They're everywhere, though that group would represent very light use.
(There's a wicked cool large group near Jackson, CA. Maybe Travis has seen it. ;) )


Grinding Stones

There may be ways to distinguish man-made grinding holes from ones which occur naturally from pebbles in water vortices. Putting that aside, it doesn't seem logical to me.

Illogical: Climb to the top of a high ridge to grind your grains and nuts. Climb back down.

Logical: Transport some of those rocks down to your village and do your grinding there.
 
I suggested limestone. Someone else said granite. You say sandstone. Is there any way of checking? Is there a publicly available geological survey map of the area?
It might be quartzite which is sandstone subjected to heat and pressure.
 
Yeah, there's a lot of things it might be, but that wasn't my question. Is there a publicly available geological survey of the area?
 
I can see that sort of weathering in the rock around the coast here. Large areas and very straight lines. Just another example of self organisation. You have seen clay puddles dry and all the straight lines that produces as the mud dries. Order arising bottom up from chaos is all around us.

There are plenty of similar examples in sandstone rocks* in the Peak District


*Millstone grit

ETA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(rock_formation)
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom