Merged Things that Bubba finds interesting or newsworthy

Henri McPhee said:
... Personally I think all this is connected to the murder of JonBenet Ramsey and the abduction of Madeleine McCann in Portugal...
Click to expand...

Can you be any less vague about what exactly you mean by "all this"? What imagined controlling hand do you believe connects the killing of an American girl in the 1990s with the disappearance of a British girl in Portugal more than a decade later?

Have you considered that you might have been watching too many movies?
 
Henri McPhee said:
There is now more and more evidence that Edward Heath in the UK was a pedophile. There was an article about it in last Sunday's Mail on Sunday newspaper.
Click to expand...
That is ribticklingly funny.

There's more evidence of a scary conspiracy.
Where did you find this evidence?
There's an article in the Mail.

I need a lie down and a cup of tea after that.
 
Wasn't there a thread in the past about rocks that someone claimed were actually dragon scales?

Here are some more pillars - actually quite common. And this one has a road through it!

ETA: From Northern Ireland Blue Mountain ;)
 

Attachments

  • giants-causeway-in-northern-ireland-wallpaper.jpg
    giants-causeway-in-northern-ireland-wallpaper.jpg
    148.1 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:
Henri McPhee said:
There is now more and more evidence that Edward Heath in the UK was a pedophile. There was an article about it in last Sunday's Mail on Sunday newspaper.
Click to expand...

Which puts it on the same standing as a Richard Littlejohn column?

Lets note some key facts:
1) The inquiry made the news in recent days, not because of shocking new evidence, but because the officer in charge of the investigation admitted it was a mistake to announce the investigation on Heath's front door.

2) The Daily Mail itself reported that Operation Conifer was a "complete waste of time" in August.

3) The Daily Mail itself reported in March that the investigation was to be closed down, with no worthwhile results, costing too much money.

These are all headlines easy to find on the Mail Online.

4) The Mail itself should probably not be casting stones. Despite its outraged headlines, the Mail and Mail Online are well known for their Sidebar Of Shame, and the Private Eye has been covering their willingness to comment on the young and pretty, for years (coverage of Emma Watson and Charlotte Church spring to mind as notorious picture headlines).
 
Tomtomkent said:
Which puts it on the same standing as a Richard Littlejohn column?

Lets note some key facts:
1) The inquiry made the news in recent days, not because of shocking new evidence, but because the officer in charge of the investigation admitted it was a mistake to announce the investigation on Heath's front door.

2) The Daily Mail itself reported that Operation Conifer was a "complete waste of time" in August.

3) The Daily Mail itself reported in March that the investigation was to be closed down, with no worthwhile results, costing too much money.

These are all headlines easy to find on the Mail Online.

4) The Mail itself should probably not be casting stones. Despite its outraged headlines, the Mail and Mail Online are well known for their Sidebar Of Shame, and the Private Eye has been covering their willingness to comment on the young and pretty, for years (coverage of Emma Watson and Charlotte Church spring to mind as notorious picture headlines).
Click to expand...
Yes, the Daily Fail wrings it's prurient hands over the sexualisation of youth while at the same time sexualising youth.

Back to topic, at least one of Ted Heaths false accusers seems to be heading for prosecution.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ng-charges-false-ted-heath-paedophile-claims/
 
Henri McPhee said:
That's just your opinion. It's patently untrue and a load of bollocks. It's you who needs help. It seems you have been damaged by your child abuse experiences.

I'll name one. President Bush. They don't like publicity about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQFCGdwGaLk

There is now more and more evidence that Edward Heath in the UK was a pedophile. There was an article about it in last Sunday's Mail on Sunday newspaper.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen anyone trot out Cathy O'Brien in a long time. What makes you believe her claims?
What evidence is there against Edward Heath?
 
Craig B said:
That is ribticklingly funny.

There's more evidence of a scary conspiracy.
Where did you find this evidence?
There's an article in the Mail.

I need a lie down and a cup of tea after that.
Click to expand...

It's no good being absurdly credulous about this matter. There was an article about Edward Heath in the Sunday Mail last Sunday. This is how it starts:

Child abuse claims made against Sir Edward Heath by seven of his alleged victims are serious enough that police would have questioned him under caution if he were still alive............
Click to expand...

There was an earlier article about the matter in a Daily Mail article on 18 February 2017:

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4238188/Sir-Edward-Heath-paedophile-says-police-chief.html
 
Henri McPhee said:
It's no good being absurdly credulous about this matter. There was an article about Edward Heath in the Sunday Mail last Sunday. This is how it starts:



There was an earlier article about the matter in a Daily Mail article on 18 February 2017:

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4238188/Sir-Edward-Heath-paedophile-says-police-chief.html
Click to expand...

And here is a more recent article from the Daily Fail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...probe-Edward-Heath-branded-idiotic-waste.html
 
Henri McPhee said:
That's just your opinion. It's patently untrue and a load of bollocks. It's you who needs help. It seems you have been damaged by your child abuse experiences.

I'll name one. President Bush. They don't like publicity about it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQFCGdwGaLk

There is now more and more evidence that Edward Heath in the UK was a pedophile. There was an article about it in last Sunday's Mail on Sunday newspaper.
Click to expand...

you do know that even wikipedia don't believe the mail, don't you?

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...s-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website
 
3point14 said:
No, it's just very aware of its target audience and that those to whom it is preaching hate have no trouble with, or even concept of, cognitive dissonance.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's funny to observe how the cost of the wasted, pointless "investigation" gets inflated by the DM. £1m, £1.5m, £2m, which is it? At the same time, the DM claims the unfounded accusations as fact and a reason that any amount of money should be flung at it.

Not to mention that the fantasist "Nick" has his head on the chopping block and Veale will have no qualms about throwing that guy under the bus to save his own skin.

As if this were not bad enough, we are treated to the claim that "yournewswire" is some kind of reliable source. Who buys into that pit of nonsense?
 
Bubba said:
Who placed the Mystery Rocks of Saskatchewan?

Doesnt look like nature's work. Burial mound, maybe.

http://ryanwunsch.com/mystery-rocks-saskatchewan/
Click to expand...

That is nature's work, not done by man. This is sandstone and was once an ancient riverbed. Most of the erosion here was done by the rushing water, with the most obvious being the near-perfect cylinder holes. Some erosion happened after it was no longer a riverbed and became exposed on the surface as we see now. This would be accomplished now by rain and wind.

It looks man-made with design but it isn't. Everything there is explained by natural erosion of an an ancient quartz sediment (sandstone) plateau.
 
William Parcher said:
That is nature's work, not done by man. This is sandstone and was once an ancient riverbed. Most of the erosion here was done by the rushing water, with the most obvious being the near-perfect cylinder holes. Some erosion happened after it was no longer a riverbed and became exposed on the surface as we see now. This would be accomplished now by rain and wind.

It looks man-made with design but it isn't. Everything there is explained by natural erosion of an an ancient quartz sediment (sandstone) plateau.
Click to expand...

I suggested limestone. Someone else said granite. You say sandstone. Is there any way of checking? Is there a publicly available geological survey map of the area?
 
Cayvmann said:
Man, if I was a pedophile, AND I ruled the world, I would change the rules so paedophilia wasn't, you know, illegal...
Click to expand...

Then where's the fun?

That's why the elites like to leave coded symbols everywhere - it's more fun if it's illegal and you can get a second set of jollies when the sheeple can't decode the clues hidden in plain sight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom