Some vaccines are great. Thats not the issue. The issue is trust. Trust in public health officials, doctors, policy etc. Trust was an issue at the time and it still is today.
A few bits from the video:
"Doctors at the Communicable Disease Ctr acknowledged the flu vaccine at recommended dosage is ineffective while in larger doses it can be harmful. However the flu vacc is still recommended for old people and the chronically ill."
(Sounds like its ineffective, take it anyway)
"Senate subcommittee headed by Sen Ribicoff charged the fed gov is not doing a good enough jobb informing the public about ineffective vaccines."
Four govt scientists at Div of Biologic Standards published their 1960s findings that the flu vaccine ineffective and refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred and a third left the Division. Over the ten year period not a word of their findings was allowed to be published.
In the footage, Dr Frederick Murray of Division of Biologic Standards is seen justifying use of the vaccine which contained a contaminant known to cause cancer, saying it was more important to use the vaccines than to take it off the market and remove the agent. Since the agent couldnt be removed, there was no other course."
(SV40 was an accidental contaminant of vaccines produced in monkey kidney tissue cultures in the 1950s and early 1960s, including a parenteral adenovirus vaccine given to several hundred thousand US military recruits.)
"...for 3 years soldiers were injected with a cold preventing vaccine containing the contaminant which was causing cancer in Lab animals "Back then the media was better at informing the public on public health issues...
re the polio/cancer item, anyone who had both vaccines (tainted polio & flu) were at a higher cancer risk as the study found that was the case the two were combined.
Fast forward to today where some question what is in vaccines, and more importantly the trustworthiness of those running the programs.
A few bits from the video:
"Doctors at the Communicable Disease Ctr acknowledged the flu vaccine at recommended dosage is ineffective while in larger doses it can be harmful. However the flu vacc is still recommended for old people and the chronically ill."
(Sounds like its ineffective, take it anyway)
"Senate subcommittee headed by Sen Ribicoff charged the fed gov is not doing a good enough jobb informing the public about ineffective vaccines."
Four govt scientists at Div of Biologic Standards published their 1960s findings that the flu vaccine ineffective and refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred and a third left the Division. Over the ten year period not a word of their findings was allowed to be published.
In the footage, Dr Frederick Murray of Division of Biologic Standards is seen justifying use of the vaccine which contained a contaminant known to cause cancer, saying it was more important to use the vaccines than to take it off the market and remove the agent. Since the agent couldnt be removed, there was no other course."
(SV40 was an accidental contaminant of vaccines produced in monkey kidney tissue cultures in the 1950s and early 1960s, including a parenteral adenovirus vaccine given to several hundred thousand US military recruits.)
"...for 3 years soldiers were injected with a cold preventing vaccine containing the contaminant which was causing cancer in Lab animals "Back then the media was better at informing the public on public health issues...
re the polio/cancer item, anyone who had both vaccines (tainted polio & flu) were at a higher cancer risk as the study found that was the case the two were combined.
Fast forward to today where some question what is in vaccines, and more importantly the trustworthiness of those running the programs.
