Yurebiz and skepticalcriticalguy-
#1. why is it so important for you guys that people at JREF believe your side of the story? Are you that insecure in your beliefs? You're like door-to-door Evangelists who keep coming back to the home that doesn't accept the "truth". You just cant deal with the fact that some very intelligent people don't want your tupperware. I see a deep emotional need for validation here.
#2. Why dont you come up with an actual theory of what happened that day. Who did what...when they did it...how they did it. Names, places, dates, materials, etc etc. Thats a real theory. We have our theory...what is yours?
You know what parky, you're right. It's pointless to provide my point of view here. Either you can see the cover up, or you can't. There is a stockpile amount of omissions in the 9/11 Commission Report that it's just amazing. And you guys know it, you have been through it before.
I'm not aiming to prove MIHOP or even LIHOP, I just wish you OCTists could at least admit LIHOI. But not even that. You hold your wits to the 9/11 Commission, knowing all it's mistakes and lack of investigation, yet you think there's no need for a new report.
You're telling me that you're fine with no officials from either the FAA nor NORAD being held accountable from their mistakes.
You're telling me that you're fine with a report that says the twin towers were hollow. And no mention of WTC7.
Those are all minor events, I reckon.
But I don't like it at all.
In defense against LIHOP I could hear every skeptic say "oh but the FAA/NORAD just covered up their asses". Well? And the Commission just LET them do that? Why no further investigation with them? What if Al-Qaeda had members infiltrated within these agencies, causing confusion to allow the hijackers to fly the planes wherever they wanted?
In my honest opinion, a true investigative inquiry would ahve gone deep into the Pakistani connections, deep into the Israeli art students infiltrated here and watching the muslim would-be hijackers, deep into the stock traders that placed put options on the airliner companies' stocks, deep investigation onto Mineta's testimony and the "young aid", deep into the multiple pre-911 warnings and it's sources, deep into what the FBI was doing at all...
But we didn't see any of that, did we?
Those are all minor leads, I reckon.
It's just so easy to cast away each one of the leads separately.
You can say, and you DO say, that it's all coincidence, no relevance at all.
I can only agree to disagree with you. I can't make you see something that hasn't been proven.
I can only point out that these issues have not been openly investigated by the agencies. They have only been investigated by independent media reporters and others. No wonder there's no connection: no authority has ever investigated it. How can a conspiracy be unveiled if no commission decides to investigate it?
How can people pay for their crimes if they were never asked about it...
We have a clear cover-up scenario. The argument of "there's no evidence" loses it's value because the evidence is withheld by the federal agencies...
SOMEONE IS CLEARLY COVERING UP THEIR ASSES. AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Hence the need of a new investigation. Agree or disagree?
Gosh, one would figure that CRITICAL THINKERS would be able to make such basic connections. -.-
