ThePentaCON releases trailer

Yes well clearly as I have explained many times the evidence we will present will show beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane flew on the north side of the station.

If you can demonstrate how it is possible that it could still topple the light poles and damage the building as outlined in the ASCE report then by all means..............demonstrate away!
You still have this exactly backwards. You have to come up with an explaination that makes sense for the light poles. Not that pixies planted them when no one was looking, but one that someone can actually believe without being stupid. Since there is none, that absolutely, positively, without doubt or room for error, proves your "plane to the north" stuff is a heaping pile of horse manure. Accept it, and move on, boy.
 
But if you have the courage to "BRING IT ON" the actual perpetrators of the crime will be brought to justice. If, as you've written here, you are so convinced that your evidence is proof positive of a crime, not bringing it forward means you're either a coward or a liar/fraud.

Give me a break Columbo.

I know you are smarter than this. I love your show! :D

Although I have already explained this part here over and over I will repeat it for you once again.

The 9/11 commission ignored and sequestered mountains of evidence. The 9/11 truth movement is marginalized and demonized by the media and authorities.

This data implicates the authorities that we're talking about.

So........could it possibly make any sense whatsoever that I would run to them first?????

Obviously not.

We will be contacting the authorities and media simultaneously with the release of the data to the public.

I have been 100% forthright about this plan since day one and in light of the claims it makes ZERO sense whatsoever that any of you would attack me for this.
 
Lyte Trip: You are lying. According to this, you guys are explicitly accusing the cab driver of treason.

http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg&forum=125&topic_id=140387&mesg_id=141657

Police(blue) get diverted from gas station, the truck/trailer perps stop on loop as if they are shocked. Taxi is unloaded off trailer(yellow) while all are staring at the Pentagon. Truck continues up on the on ramp drops pole 1(green) in the fast/middle southbound lane street on bridge and perhaps bulb/glass debris. Cab eases his way up on the highway with "damage". Our police officer was adamant when he said he was sure the cab was over near that overhead sign (the one the plane flew over), near the on ramp...not on the bridge.

As everyone is distracted, the cabbie pulls up to the final point, the faceless guys in the Saturn pull up and move the pole making the scratch in the asphalt, so they can park their car. And with the assistance of the faceless shirt and tie men in the fire dept Saturn he turns his cab sideways near the pole, giving the appearance that he is helping block traffic going soutbound. They, perhaps the shirt and tie guys in the Saturn stand around and maybe even drop the glass, bulb pieces perhaps even the little pieces of leaves.

You can see the trailer, the suit and tie men, their Saturn with the FD license plate, pole 1 and the scratch in the asphalt, and loyd and his cab. Look at lloyd on the phone.

All of you CIT guys might want to get a Sharpie, bend over, reach between your legs, and write Lloyd England onto your [rule8]es right now, because as soon as this video gets released, England is going to own them.
 
Um, no, it isn't any different. Doesn't matter if it's a single individual or a hundred, it's still withholding evidence. Of course, since you are dense, you won't understand this. Your massive delusions won't let you.
The ONLY reason you won't be arrested is because you're peddling tripe. There is nothing more you can say, your silly film amounts to nothing, and you are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.

There's nothing to bring on, other than pity for someone as foolish as you.

Wow.

Are you really this dense?

I guess most of you guys are since this claim is repeated by so many of you so often without anyone stepping in to let them know how stupid it is.

IF I AM CONVICTED OF WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE IT WILL MEAN I WAS PROVEN 100% CORRECT!

Which means as an honorable person that believes in true justice you would join in the massive protests against my prosecution.

Right?
 
Incorrect.

I suggested there will be a "grand jury".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_jury

Understand now?

Uuuuh No because instead of answering my question you attempt to ridicule me by pointing me towards a definition of Grand Jury.

Why do you attempt to ridicule people when they are asking legit questions?

I mean you are the one after all who made the statements about Grand Jury's.

I am quite aware of what a Grand Jury is.
 
Wow.

Are you really this dense?

I guess most of you guys are since this claim is repeated by so many of you so often without anyone stepping in to let them know how stupid it is.

IF I AM CONVICTED OF WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE IT WILL MEAN I WAS PROVEN 100% CORRECT!

Which means as an honorable person that believes in true justice you would join in the massive protests against my prosecution.

Right?
I think you need to re-read my post. I said you won't be tried for withholding evidence, because you HAVE NO EVIDENCE of anything other than being an egotistical moron.

Is that clear enough for you now? Probably not, but I'll give it a try.
 
Lyte Trip: You are lying. According to this, you guys are explicitly accusing the cab driver of treason.

http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg&forum=125&topic_id=140387&mesg_id=141657



All of you CIT guys might want to get a Sharpie, bend over, reach between your legs, and write Lloyd England onto your [rule8]es right now, because as soon as this video gets released, England is going to own them.

Nice try but strike two.

(the first was your attempt to claim the footage of the smoke plume proves there was no flyover. I debunked you thinking you were toto.)

Show me where we have made any direct claim in regards to Lloyd's involvement.

We believe he is a victim of coercion.
 
Nice try but strike two.

(the first was your attempt to claim the footage of the smoke plume proves there was no flyover. I debunked you thinking you were toto.)

Show me where we have made any direct claim in regards to Lloyd's involvement.

We believe he is a victim of coercion.
We believe you're a victim of stupidity.
 
Uuuuh No because instead of answering my question you attempt to ridicule me by pointing me towards a definition of Grand Jury.

Why do you attempt to ridicule people when they are asking legit questions?

I mean you are the one after all who made the statements about Grand Jury's.

I am quite aware of what a Grand Jury is.

Ridicule?

No.

You erroneously claimed that I had said there would be trials and asked who would be brought to trial.

I corrected you by showing you what I actually suggested which is completely irrelevant to the question you asked me.
 
Nice try but strike two.

(the first was your attempt to claim the footage of the smoke plume proves there was no flyover. I debunked you thinking you were toto.)

Show me where we have made any direct claim in regards to Lloyd's involvement.

We believe he is a victim of coercion.

You haven't debunked anything. The people who shot that video had the camera up within seconds, not 60 as you claim (no math!). As I've shown, they were in a perfect position to see any plane flying over the Pentagon. They do not claim a plane flew over the Pentagon, do they?

Do they?

I link to where you have made a direct claim to Lloyd's involvement. You think he drove up onto that highway with his car already "damaged," and that he "eased" up into the position he was finally found in. This is the equivalent of naming him a direct party to treason.
 
Nice try but strike two.

(the first was your attempt to claim the footage of the smoke plume proves there was no flyover. I debunked you thinking you were toto.)

Show me where we have made any direct claim in regards to Lloyd's involvement.

We believe he is a victim of coercion.

Nobody cares what you believe pal.

Nobody cares about you and your ridiculous motives and stupid movie.

Get on with it, get it released then go away.
 
Hey Lyte-

I'm willing to bet that as long as your little video project(it's not a movie, and it's barely a video) receives a lot of views/dowloads, you won't care if it raises eyebrows or raises awareness, or evokes a grand jury.

I don't want to know what you'll do with your evidence, I already know the answer to that.

I want to know what you'll do if-God forbid-your little endeavor fails.

Little piece of advice-start applying to cashier jobs.
 
what do you mean cashier jobs? When he's sued to hell and back, no business will want to hire him because they are going to garnish anything that he makes.

He'll have to resort to the same crap jobs that illegal aliens fight for.
 
You haven't debunked anything. The people who shot that video had the camera up within seconds, not 60 as you claim (no math!). As I've shown, they were in a perfect position to see any plane flying over the Pentagon. They do not claim a plane flew over the Pentagon, do they?

How many seconds? At 500 mph that's roughly 733 feet per second. That means in just 7.2 seconds the plane would be a mile away. In 36 seconds it would be 5 miles away.

The footage proves NOTHING.


I link to where you have made a direct claim to Lloyd's involvement. You think he drove up onto that highway with his car already "damaged," and that he "eased" up into the position he was finally found in. This is the equivalent of naming him a direct party to treason.


Ok but the same rules apply to Lloyd as they do to me with the absurd claim that I am "withholding evidence".

If he is proven guilty of treason I have a strong feeling the new power structure will grant him a pardon when the details of his being manipulated into involvement are uncovered.
 
Last edited:
How many seconds? At 500 mph that's roughly 733 feet per second. That means in just 7.2 seconds the plane would be a mile away. In 36 seconds it would be 5 miles away.

The footage proves NOTHING.[/quyote]
it proves you're a liar.

the video proves that within seconds of hte impact it was being filmed. The family would have stated on the video "hey did you just see that plane fly over!" . none of that reaction by anyone.

why didn't the people traveling on the freeways (that pretty much surround the pentagon) every come forward about seeing a plane fly over?

NO ONE has in the 6 years sicne... why is that lyte?
 
How many seconds? At 500 mph that's roughly 733 feet per second. That means in just 7.2 seconds the plane could be 7 miles away. In 20 seconds it could be 14 miles away.

Congratulation, Lyte Trip. Not only have you served yourself a heaping helping of a civil lawsuit, but you probably just won the February 2007 Stundie for that brilliant display of mathematical acumen.

733 ft/s * 7.2s = 5277.6 ft - how many feet in a mile, Lyte?

1 mile = 5280 feet. That means in 7.2 seconds the flyover plane would have traveled almost exactly 1 mile. In 20 seconds, it might have been three miles away...

...and yet that measures linear distance, correct? You have the flyover plane doing a parabola. That means the plane will not be that much further away.

Tell me, oh mathematical genius, how much power would that plane have to use to MAINTAIN a speed of 530 mph while climbing?

While you're busy licking your pencil on that one, the rest of the world will realize that in climbing, the plane would have to slow down, and so would not even have traveled a mile in 7.2 seconds.

The footage proves NOTHING.

On the contrary, it and the Doubletree prove that your flyover theory is completely and utterly wrong.

Ok but the same rules apply to Lloyd as they do to me with the absurd claim that I am "withholding evidence".

If he is proven guilty of treason I have a strong feeling the new power structure will grant him a pardon when the details of his being manipulated into involvement are uncovered.

Good heavens, what lamebrainery. Lloyd is not guilty of treason. He will not be proven guilty of treason. Man, you really have come down hard with a case of incestuous amplification, haven't you?
 
Thank God I quoted that post before your edit. I've salvaged your Stundie, Lyte.

FlightPathPostHit.jpg
 
Last edited:
Congratulation, Lyte Trip. Not only have you served yourself a heaping helping of a civil lawsuit, but you probably just won the February 2007 Stundie for that brilliant display of mathematical acumen.

733 ft/s * 7.2s = 5277.6 ft - how many feet in a mile, Lyte?

1 mile = 5280 feet. That means in 7.2 seconds the flyover plane would have traveled almost exactly 1 mile. In 20 seconds, it might have been three miles away...

...and yet that measures linear distance, correct? You have the flyover plane doing a parabola. That means the plane will not be that much further away.

hey noticed that he edited his post after you quoted it to reflect a whole different figure?
 

Back
Top Bottom