ThePentaCON releases trailer

Coritani said:
Why the hell would the government do a rudiculously irrational flyover instead of flying the plane into the pentagon? It makes no sense. When answering, bear in mind that the gubmint had already killed 2500+ people in the towers...
Click to expand...
and, they were going to have to get rid of the physical plane that was AA77, and the people on it, anyway. Why take all the risk that someone would see such an obvious flyover, when they could just crash the real plane, with the real people, into the building? It would be the most retarded plan ever, ever.
 
SkepticGuy said:
I'm certainly not trying to compare the Pentacon movie effort, just offer some perspective.

Lots of people form motion pictures to TV shows to TV documentaries believed they found evidence that proved a conspiracy to murder a sitting president... ... ... and made a movie/video/show. Do you feel the same about them?
Click to expand...

You cannot understand can you? You simply do not get it do you?

Please allow me to explain to you why people are so upset and annoyed at this.

This is a documentary with alleges that flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon but in fact flew over it, in broad day light in front of potentially hundreds of witnesses.

This is not about people defending Bush, Cheney or the nasty USG, it is about reality friend.

For this plan to have worked, literally hundreds of people would have to be involved.

The people who planned the DNA, the people who planted the plane parts,the people who planted the black boxes, the people who faked the data on the black boxes, the people who planted the passenger’s personnel effects, the people who damaged the lamp posts, the people who confiscated the CCTV footage, the people who responded. The fire crews, the medical teams and anybody else who rushed to help.The people who wrote the reports etc, etc.

Then you have the people who rigged or flew the plane, the people who took the passengers else where, the airport staff where the plane landed, the people who herded the passengers off the plane, the people who killed them , the people who disposed of their remains or planted their remains at the Pentagon.

Every single person who saw the plane has to be lying or mistaken,

These are to name but a few, did Bush do this himself? Did Cheney?

No friend somebody else did, some unknown unseen people. For this film to be true literally hundreds of people, your fellow countrymen would have to be involved in unquestioning, ruthless murder of innocent people.

So are you happy to go along or as you like to claim are you somewhat skeptical?

Would you buy this movie? Would you be happy to promote it? Would you happily follow Mr. Ltye and his merry band and have your family members exposed to this utter garbage? And get sucked into it?

Or would you prefer reality, rational and reason?
 
Last edited:
Forgive me if this has been asked but Lyte (or anyone who knows] did you guys canvas the area under the official flight path to see if you could did up any witnesses who saw it fly over them?

If yes, what did you come up with?

If not, why not?
 
The funs and laughs at DU continues.

Using the govt loyalist own argument of 'up to' 2 seconds of error, we can see this aircraft was too high to hit the poles and the pentagon.

However, using the actual data that was recorded 1 second prior to the pentagon wall as provided directly from the NTSB (and not making excuses like there may be 'up to 2 seconds missing'), it is further in conflict with the govt story.

...In other words, this was a TARGETED AND CONTAINED IMPACT. It was not a matter of random chance. A plane coming in from the roof line would have done far greater damage and could have led to uncontrolled fires throughout the complex.

So, there was a problem here. On the one hand, the damage had to be contained within a certain area and, on the other, the event had to appear to be a LOW FLYING hijacked commercial airliner.

The light poles were the subliminal evidence presented to the public to "prove" the official narrative. That it does no such thing is irrelevant. It is USED in that way uncritically -- ACCEPT (sic) BY individuals of the Citizens Investigation Team and Pilots For 9/11 Truth.
Click to expand...

http://www.democraticunderground.co...mesg&forum=125&topic_id=140387&mesg_id=141662
 
Totovader said:
I have a sneaking suspicion that Lyte won't post his evidence here because he's (understandably) afraid that it will be debunked prior to the "movie" coming out. Most of the claims so far have been easily refuted- and are just rehashes of previous claims. Having them debunked would mean all the CGI work for nothing.

This is the difference between a documentary, and the crap that CT's put out: a documentary is an investigative work, it can be wrong- it doesn't need to stall and withhold information in fear.

We've seen the same thing with Loose Change- terrified of repeating past errors in statements, they are unable to grasp that their failure is one of logic- not just of getting specific facts wrong.
Click to expand...

I will fully admit that your quote of boloboffin made me think you were the one that made the post.

I don't have time to read every single post thoroughly here and you only added one word without editing the quote so I percieved it as being from you.

But you are incorrect in your assumption that we won't post our information here.

1. We won't need to as the members here will post a link to it the very moment it is released. ("Smoking Gun Version" will be DEFINITELY released next week. I promise!)

2. I will most certainly return here for discussions/debate as I firmly believe there are SOME honest members here who will admit that this testimony has convinced them that the plane flew on the north side of the station.
 
Lyte Trip said:
I will fully admit that your quote of boloboffin made me think you were the one that made the post.

I don't have time to read every single post thoroughly here and you only added one word without editing the quote so I percieved it as being from you.

But you are incorrect in your assumption that we won't post our information here.

1. We won't need to as the members here will post a link to it the very moment it is released. ("Smoking Gun Version" will be DEFINITELY released next week. I promise!)

2. I will most certainly return here for discussions/debate as I firmly believe there are SOME honest members here who will admit that this testimony has convinced them that the plane flew on the north side of the station.
Click to expand...

Lyte.

Stop.

Think.

You're taking eyewitness testimony over physical evidence. Do you think that this is the right thing to do?
 
Lyte,
Your behaviour is very very bizzare.
You release a trialer that shows your contention that no plane hit the pentagon and then all you can say is
"the plane flew on the north side of the station"
Why are you avoiding this when you have already released a trailer claiming no plane hit the Pentagon?
Why wont you discuss no plane hitting the pentagon?
You have dropped a gernade no at least stand the F by it!
 
SkepticGuy said:
I'm certainly not trying to compare the Pentacon movie effort, just offer some perspective.

Lots of people form motion pictures to TV shows to TV documentaries believed they found evidence that proved a conspiracy to murder a sitting president... ... ... and made a movie/video/show. Do you feel the same about them?
Click to expand...
Generally speaking, I believe anyone who believes they possess information proving someone guilty of murder and makes a movie instead of taking the evidence to the authorities is a fraud.

Now, if you have any specific examples, I'd be happy to comment on them.
 
DavidJames said:
Generally speaking, I believe anyone who believes they possess information proving someone guilty of murder and makes a movie instead of taking the evidence to the authorities is a fraud.
Click to expand...

Someone?

You're kidding right?

I have no information that implicates any single individual.

You know perfectly well this is an entirely different claim.

You guys keep saying this over and over and over and my response is....

BRING IT ON!

If I am convicted it will only mean that I have been proven 100% correct.

I have a gut feeling the new power structure will grant me a pardon.
 
Bobert said:
Lyte,
Your behaviour is very very bizzare.
You release a trialer that shows your contention that no plane hit the pentagon and then all you can say is
"the plane flew on the north side of the station"
Why are you avoiding this when you have already released a trailer claiming no plane hit the Pentagon?
Why wont you discuss no plane hitting the pentagon?
You have dropped a gernade no at least stand the F by it!
Click to expand...

Yes well clearly as I have explained many times the evidence we will present will show beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane flew on the north side of the station.

If you can demonstrate how it is possible that it could still topple the light poles and damage the building as outlined in the ASCE report then by all means..............demonstrate away!
 
Lyte Trip said:
Someone?

You're kidding right?

I have no information that implicates any single individual.

You know perfectly well this is an entirely different claim.

You guys keep saying this over and over and over and my response is....

BRING IT ON!

If I am convicted it will only mean that I have been proven 100% correct.

I have a gut feeling the new power structure will grant me a pardon.
Click to expand...

But if you have the courage to "BRING IT ON" the actual perpetrators of the crime will be brought to justice. If, as you've written here, you are so convinced that your evidence is proof positive of a crime, not bringing it forward means you're either a coward or a liar/fraud.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Someone?

You're kidding right?

I have no information that implicates any single individual.

You know perfectly well this is an entirely different claim.

You guys keep saying this over and over and over and my response is....

BRING IT ON!

If I am convicted it will only mean that I have been proven 100% correct.

I have a gut feeling the new power structure will grant me a pardon.
Click to expand...
Um, no, it isn't any different. Doesn't matter if it's a single individual or a hundred, it's still withholding evidence. Of course, since you are dense, you won't understand this. Your massive delusions won't let you.
The ONLY reason you won't be arrested is because you're peddling tripe. There is nothing more you can say, your silly film amounts to nothing, and you are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.

There's nothing to bring on, other than pity for someone as foolish as you.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Someone?

You're kidding right?

I have no information that implicates any single individual.

You know perfectly well this is an entirely different claim.

You guys keep saying this over and over and over and my response is....

BRING IT ON!

If I am convicted it will only mean that I have been proven 100% correct.

I have a gut feeling the new power structure will grant me a pardon.
Click to expand...

Ok Great buuuut you have made statements that there will be trials or grand juries this year as a result of your movie.

So who will be brought to trial?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom