ThePentaCON releases trailer

Coritani said:
And a slightly longer one: Let's say that the plane did fly the different flight path, for the sake of argument. How did you come to the conclusion that it flew over the pentagon, rather than hitting it? Sounds like speculation to me.
Click to expand...

Lyte Trip said:
Because it is physically impossible for the plane to have toppled the light poles and cause the damage to the building as outlined in the ASCE report.
Click to expand...

That really isn't answering the question. Please try again.
 
Lyte Trip said:
BTW....I don't have the time to respond to a bunch of inane bullet points and long posts filled with the same old boring rhetoric and irrelevant nonsense.

I suggest you keep you questions quick and to the point if you want a response.
Click to expand...

Oh di dums, not getting all upset are you?

Listen, child, you are with holding evidence, you are being an idiotic fool, playing games with other peoples life.

Take your evidence to the Law, prove you are a man, or STFU.

Is that plain enough for you.?
 
Lyte Trip said:
"Smoking Gun Version" next week and "Researcher's Edition" soon after.

For the most part yes but the Researcher's Edition covers everything about the Pentagon.

Because it is physically impossible for the plane to have toppled the light poles and cause the damage to the building as outlined in the ASCE report.
Click to expand...

Wrong; The plane did hit the posts and did impact the Pentagon. I have checked your data and found giant holes in your FDR data. Big holes.

So spread your lies and try to make some money. Total disrespect and you are calling all my brothers in the service liars. Good job.

You FDR data is missing many seconds and you have also ignored the fact the guys never synchronized the data. The last data frame is missing a data point the NTSB did decode. You rookies. You liars.

The FDR data makes it impossible to put 77 to the north. You will be telling lies when you post your junk. Go ahead and lie if you must but no one in your group is about to understand FDR data and collection or what the NTSB video purpose and how it was made. JDX does not even know standard pilot information.

Let me count all the data you have wrong;

No one saw the fly over; Air Force pilots were flying and did not see the fly over; they did not see a plane they saw hit the Pentagon fly over. Wrong no fly over. I can talk to these guys who saw it not fly over, they are Air Force Officers.

Next all the DNA from the passengers on 77 was found in the Pentagon exactly where 77 hit.

Next THE FDR had a heading of 70 degrees magnetic. If you use the FDR data you can only have the plane fly 70 degrees. You can not use the FDR to prove your flight path it is impossible! You failed, 70 degrees is an absolute, you can not have your heading if you use the FDR data; THIS IS A BIG POINT; YOU ARE A DOLT IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND AND JDX IS JUST PLAIN INSANE.

What is funny you guys are all too dumb to decode anything. Next time find a pilot that is not insane.
 
Last edited:
So Lyte, how does this C-130 fit in to your scenario?

The video shows a large plane, presumably the c-130 high over the pentagon at the 1:45 mark, which make it about 2 minutes after the impact.

Do you think this is the plane that did the low flyover of the pentagon north of the citgo?

If it was part of the plot, why would it still be at the scene 2 minutes later?
 
beachnut said:
What is funny you guys are all too dumb to decode anything. Next time find a pilot that is not insane.
Click to expand...

Slow your rhetoric down beachy.

I know you can be cool when you try.

The FDR has nothing to do with the testimony we will present.
 
babazaroni said:
So Lyte, how does this C-130 fit in to your scenario?

The video shows a large plane, presumably the c-130 high over the pentagon at the 1:45 mark, which make it about 2 minutes after the impact.

Do you think this is the plane that did the low flyover of the pentagon north of the citgo?

If it was part of the plot, why would it still be at the scene 2 minutes later?
Click to expand...

Ahhhhh.

Someone who has been paying attention.

Good job.

I agree that the c-130 didn't come in until at least 60 seconds or so after the explosion as news reports and interviews with the pilot indicate this.

But yet there are accounts from people like Keith Wheelhouse and Joel Sucherman claiming it was "shadowing" the jet and veered off into the sky within 3 to 5 seconds later.

Why would they say this babazaroni when it conflicts with the news reports, what other witnesses claim, and what the c-130 pilot himself claims?

hmmmmmmmmmmmm?


Think real hard on that one for a while.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Ahhhhh.

Someone who has been paying attention.

Good job.

I agree that the c-130 didn't come in until at least 60 seconds or so after the explosion as news reports and interviews with the pilot indicate this.

But yet there are accounts from people like Keith Wheelhouse and Joel Sucherman claiming it was "shadowing" the jet and veered off into the sky within 3 to 5 seconds later.

Why would they say this babazaroni when it conflicts with the news reports, what other witnesses claim, and what the c-130 pilot himself claims?

hmmmmmmmmmmmm?


Think real hard on that one for a while.
Click to expand...


Because they are mistaken? How many others say the same?
 
We do know for certain the c-130 was over the pentagon 2 minutes after the crash.

If it was part of the plot, then the plotters are very stupid.

If it did the low flyover, dropped the bomb, whatever, it would be smart to get the hell out of there.
 
Lyte Trip said:
So toto......

Are you suggesting the c130 didn't exist?

Why didn't these people or these images show the c-130?
Click to expand...

The C-130 does not have to be in the frame, and the pilots have limitations on how low they can fly over people. Wake up.

The video does not mean the C-130 was not there. Pilots have eyes that work, they can see and think. The C-130 crew would have seen a fly over of a large fast moving jet. As would many people who were there that day. You either have liars as witnesses or some people have set you up and will sue you guys or Dylan if he uses your stuff. Some one is playing you guys, or you are incredibly stupid.
 
Last edited:
babazaroni said:
We do know for certain the c-130 was over the pentagon 2 minutes after the crash.

If it was part of the plot, then the plotters are very stupid.

If it did the low flyover, dropped the bomb, whatever, it would be smart to get the hell out of there.
Click to expand...

Now you are off track.

We do not believe it had anything to do with damaging the pentagon.

I'm sorry but I have given you enough information to think about until the movie is released.

But you are most definitely focusing on a very important detail.

Props to you for that.

Stay on it!
 
By the way, regarding the light poles...I pointed out back at my journal that you can clearly see that the material in these light poles was bent at the point of "impact". If an explosion actually caused the steel to bend, it would have to be quite massive. In other words, people sure as hell would have seen such an explosion.
Click to expand...

Actually that's not correct. Very little force would be needed to bring those poles down. Because of the proximity to Reagan airport. The light poles had to have a very light impact tollerance. 250KG load I think the specs was

If the light poles had been standard every day highway light poles I am not sure the plane would have made to the pentagon
 
Last edited:
Here's the deal Lyte, if you really cared about the passengers, the people in the Pentagon, the TRUTH, you would have posted your evidence here the first time you made your thread.

But you don't care. Like I and many of us have said from the beginning, you just want your slick film; you want to be the next Dylan Avery.

God forbid you post your evidence here to let us evaluate it - you might lose your priority to it! Horrors if the world doesn't know about your "dogged diligence" to give you credit for it.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Perhaps people like you will ask more relevant questions?
Click to expand...

This question is very relevant and one you purposefully avoid.

Claiming you have evidence that will topple the US Government and the saying the consequences of releasing that evidence is irrelevant, shows you know you are lying.

Period.
 
In the following vid the aluminum material isn't as shiny as that in ThePCon, but the substance is based on reality:

Mike J. Wilson: A short movie illustrating the final moments of American Airlines flight 77. Key points include lamp pole evidence, security cam view analysis, generator damage and actual photos.
Witness new video and photos never seen before until just recently.

pentagon-mikejwilson.com.jpg


YouTube video

Mike J. Wilson's 9/11 Report
 
John Blonn said:
Here's the deal Lyte, if you really cared about the passengers, the people in the Pentagon, the TRUTH, you would have posted your evidence here the first time you made your thread.

But you don't care. Like I and many of us have said from the beginning, you just want your slick film; you want to be the next Dylan Avery.

God forbid you post your evidence here to let us evaluate it - you might lose your priority to it! Horrors if the world doesn't know about your "dogged diligence" to give you credit for it.
Click to expand...


I have explained the logic behind our decision for this many times.

All 9/11 evidence has been marginalized and ignored by the media and authorities.

The entire north of the citgo claim is LOST on virtually everyone within the movement let alone the general public that has not done any 9/11 research whatsoever.

We are obligated to present the data in context with the physical damage flight path as depicted in the official reports.

We HAVE to make a movie for people to get it.

Get it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom