Merged Theory links Newtonian/Quantum the amazing Frank Znidarsic

[JCM]

You cant state Planck's constant is irrelevant if your explanation of the fine structure constant is explained in terms of Planck's constant. You need to understand energy transfers and impedance matches. Planck's constant is only measured by experiments. Lofty professors of Physics cant show what it is derived from. The speed of transition can be proven from first principles, meaning that it is not simply empiracle.
You all need to understand this :
Vt is the underlying cause of planck's constant, not the otherway around.

 

[MattusMaximus]

Nope through would be completely and of course you've not read the newest paper and build a straw-man of an old paper

Your link to the new paper didn't work, so I read what I could get my hands on. But from the text you posted above, it seems that it was the same paper.

Yes BECs are completely relevant to the conversation at hand.

Oh, this is going to be fun. Please explain exactly how BECs are relevant, because Znidarsic certainly didn't explain it in his paper (Hint: hand-waving doesn't count)

Being a professor do you understand what BECs are?

Yup. I had a couple of courses in grad school which dealt with them. I also happened to be learning about the theory behind BECs at the same time they were first created in the laboratory - that was exciting

And what role they play in the model put forth by Frank?

No clue at all, because he's just making things up out of whole cloth.

Why then ask wtf since obviously they are aptly included in the paper?

Znidarsic, and you apparently, think that simply mentioning Bose-Einstein Condensates in a random paper somehow, magically gives it more validity. It doesn't.

I am beginning to suspect you are no professor at all

Obvious physics crank is obvious

 

[Dancing David]

umm they actually have maybe you are just not up to date? The problem is palladium purity and 50-10nm range of domain uniformity issues in the palladium used by some of the supposed "failures". At a uniform 50 - 10 nm palladium, cold fusion with palladium is reduplicated easily and has been around the world

Data, evidence, citations?

 

[JCM]

So where does Isaac fit into this?

His classical physics models can be used to predict empirically verified quanta level data.

 

[JCM]

Data, evidence, citations?

CONCLUSION
The field of quantum physics revolves around the stationary quantum state. A speed has emerged from experiments involving low level nuclear reactions. This author, with the use of this speed, has developed results as a condition of the transitional quantum state. This new understanding suggests that a macroscopic body may be forced into a state of quantum transition. Trillions of atoms may be adjoined within a single transitional state. Strong gravitational and long range nuclear forces may be produced. The use of these strong, long range forces could provide new sources of propulsion, allow for the reduction of nuclear waste, and lead to the development of new sources of energy.

1. I. Bernard Cohen, Henry Crew, Joseph von Fraunhofer, De Witt Bristol Brac, The Wave theory, light and Spectra. Ayer Publishing, 1981
2. Robert Bunsen, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Volume 22, 1900
3. L Hartmann, Johann Jakob Balmer, Physikalische Blätter 5 (1949), 11-14
4. W. Ritz, Magnetische Atomfelder und Serienspektren, Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge. Band 25, 1908, p. 660–696.
5. Planck Max, On the Law of the Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum, Annalon der Physik, Vol. 4, p 553, (1901).
6. Einstein Albert, Development of our Conception of the Nature and Constitution of Radiation, Physikalische Zeitschrift 22, (1909)
7. Bohr Niels, On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, Vol. 26, pp 1-25 (1913)
8. Maxwell James Clerk, A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 155, (1865)
9. Lewis deBroglie, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta (Researches on the quantum theory), Thesis, Paris, 1924
10. Max Born, The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Nobel Lectures, 1964
11. A Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Roses, Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 - 780 (1935)
12. Miley George H., Nuclear Transmutations in Thin-Film Nickel Coatings Undergoing Electrolysis, 2nd International Conference on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, (1996).
13. Mosier-Boss, Szpak S., Gorden F.E. and Forsley L.P.G., Use of CR-39 in Pd/D co-deposition Experiments, European Journal of Applied Physics, 40, 293-303, (2007)
14. Storms Edmond, Cold Fusion, A Challenge to Modern Science, The Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol 9, No. 4, pp 585-594, (1995)
15. Rothwell Jed, Infinite Energy, Issue 29, p 23. (1999) "50 nano-meters ..is the magic domain that produces a detectable cold fusion reaction"
16. Arata Y. and Fujita H., Zhang Y., Intense deuterium nuclear Fusion of Pycnodeuterium-Lumps Coagulated Locally within highly Deuterated Atomic Clusters, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Vol. 78, Ser.B, No.7 (2002)
17. Li Ning and Torr D.G., Gravitational effects on the Magnetic Attenuation of Superconductors, Physical Review B, Vol 46, #9, (1992)
18. Reiss Harrald, Anomalies Observed During the Cool-Down of High Temperature Superconductors, Physics Essays, Vol. 16, No. 2 (June 2002).
19. Tajmar M., deMathos C, Coupling of Gravitational and Electromagnetism in the Weak Field Approximation, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003011
20. Podkletnov E. and Levi A.D., A Possibility of Gravitational Force Shielding by Bulk YBa2Cu307-x Superconductor, Physica C, vol 203, pp 441-444 (1992).
21. Papaconstantopoulus D. A. and Klein B. M., Superconductivity in Palladium-Hydrogen Systems, Phys. Rev. Letters (July 14, 1975)
22. M. Modarres, Momentum Distributions of Nuclear Matter, 1987 Europhys. Lett. 3 1083
23. A. Sommerfeld, Principles of the Quantum Theory and the Bohr Atomic Model, Naturwissenschaften (1924), 12 1047-9
24. Richard Feynman, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, 1988
25. The Lex Foundation, What is Quantum Mechanics, page 189, 1996
26. Znidarsic Frank, A Reconciliation of Quantum Physics and Special Relativity, The General Journal of Physics, Dec 2005, http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic.pdf

 

[C_Felix]

His classical physics models can be used to predict empirically verified quanta level data.

So do a few of the versions of String Theory.


If I had no knowledge of the Pythagorean theorum, and worked it out for myself, did I just link math and geometery?

 

[JCM]

No clue at all, because he's just making things up out of whole cloth.

The quantum condition describes the angular momentum of a quantum system. The
angular momentum is an integer multiple of Planck’s constant. Bohr and Einstein sought
a classical explanation for the quantum condition. Schrödinger incorporated Bohr's
quantum condition and determined the intensity of the atomic spectrum. Rutherford
searched for a solution, gave up, and began his work with the nucleus. Over one
hundred years have passed since a classical connection was sought. None of the great
scientists has discovered a classical explanation for the quantum condition. The mystery
remains today and is embodied in the duality of particles and waves.
This author has discovered a classical link to the quantum condition. The link is the
elastic limit of space. The introduction of the elastic limit reveals the path of the
quantum transition and provides insight into the duality of particles and waves.
Convention represents the matter wave as the superposition of an infinite number of
component waves. The Fourier addition of component waves localizes the matter wave.
Waves, other than the matter wave, are localized by restraining forces. This author
proposes that the natural forces are pinned into the structure of matter (restrained) at a
discontinuity produced by the elastic limit of space. Reflections are produced at the
discontinuity. The superposition of the incident and reflected wave is the deBroglie wave
of matter.

Yea sounds right out of cloth

A discontinuity forms when the intensity of a force field exceeds the elastic limit of space.
The natural forces are pinned into the structure of matter at this discontinuity. The
elastic of space is a geometric property. It is expressed in units of reciprocal
capacitance. Each of the natural forces experiences the elastic limit of in its own way.
The gravitational force experiences it through its weakness and the structure of the
universe. The electromagnetic force experiences it through a maximum of intensity.
The nuclear forces experience it through the geometry of the proton and neutron.
Quantum events are normally described from the vantage point of the stationary
quantum states. Recent experiments have produced observables that have allowed this
author to describe quantum events from the vantage point of the transitional quantum
state. During a quantum transition the elastic limit of space releases its grip on the
natural forces. The velocity of the transitional quantum state, with respect to an elastic
discontinuity, is fixed at 1.094 million meters per second. The velocity appears, in noncentric
systems, as the dimensional frequency 1.094 megahertz-meters.
It has been shown that the elastic limit of space establishes the zero point properties of
stable matter. Many new phenomena are observed as fixed parameters thaw (become
variable). Conventional science has developed a bias towards looking to higher energies
to find interesting phenomena. Little application can be found for the discovered highenergy
phenomena. This author has introduced a new parameter, the elastic limit of
space. The elastic limit of space (quantum of reciprocal capacitance) becomes variable
at very low energies. The low energy affects are accessible with affordable technologies.
This author believes that the understanding of the affects produced by a changing
quantum of capacitance will allow man to directly control each of the four natural forces.
This understanding should produce a revolution in technology.

Gosh he's totally pulling it out of nowhere. The quantum world is not a magical world where physics laws cannot be applied. The magic land where the classical doesn't apply to quanta sounds like a cult not science. Frank is reconciling the two worlds, not retreating to a magical, dare I say "supernatural" explanation for empirically observed phenomena and instead sticks to Physics classical foundation in explaining things observed at the quantum level. And it works as evidenced by the number of calculations able to be done without empirical knowledge. Can any of you derive Einsteins- Photo-Electric constant WITHOUT Planck's constant? And yet I did in this thread. You are chicken and egging Planck and V_t. V_t is supreme to Planck in that it is classically explainable while professors pulled planck's constant out of cloth and CANNOT explain what it derives from

 

[JCM]

If I had no knowledge of the Pythagorean theorum, and worked it out for myself, did I just link math and geometery

If the world had no knowledge of the Pythagorean theorum then yes. Franks given us V_t something the physics world still claims to have no knowledge of

 

[JCM]

Frank Znidarsic, "Motion Constants", Transactions of the American Nuclear
Society, Vol. 83, November 2000

Real quack I mean Transactions of the American Nuclear Society thats basically Fortean Times right?!?

 

[ben m]

If the world had no knowledge of the Pythagorean theorum then yes. Franks given us V_t something the physics world still claims to have no knowledge of

I have discovered a new constant, T, that explains gravity better than Newton. Here's the new classical gravity equation:

F = pi * e * M1 M2 / ( 2 * T r^2 )

See the new constant, T? From this new constant I can derive Newton's constant:

G = pi * e / 2 T

Have I "given you something the physics world claims to have no knowledge of"?

 

[MattusMaximus]

Gosh he's totally pulling it out of nowhere. The quantum world is not a magical world where physics laws cannot be applied. The magic land where the classical doesn't apply to quanta sounds like a cult not science. Frank is reconciling the two worlds, not retreating to a magical, dare I say "supernatural" explanation for empirically observed phenomena and instead sticks to Physics classical foundation in explaining things observed at the quantum level. And it works as evidenced by the number of calculations able to be done without empirical knowledge. Can any of you derive Einsteins- Photo-Electric constant WITHOUT Planck's constant? And yet I did in this thread. You are chicken and egging Planck and V_t. V_t is supreme to Planck in that it is classically explainable while professors pulled planck's constant out of cloth and CANNOT explain what it derives from

Nope. You may think you did so, but it seems that you're not convincing anyone else here that you did (especially those of us who know physics).

ETA: Great example, ben_m

 

[JCM]

Why doesnt the electron ever crash into the nucleus? That is can anyone give a causative explanation as to why two attractive forces never attract each past a certain point? Isn't the atom a perpetual motion machine?

Let's face it the current state of quantum mechanics is not even a true branch of physics. Physics is the study of CAUSATION. I mean what CAUSES orbits to be quantized in discrete steps? Frank has left the quantum magic for magicians and brought physics back to science

 

[JCM]

Ben Matt what is the causation of Planck's constant?!?!?

 

[MattusMaximus]

Ben Matt what is the causation of Planck's constant?!?!?

In terms of ben_m's example above, can you explain what is the causation of G, the Universal Gravitational Constant? Or, to stay consistent, are you going to claim that gravity is "magic"?

 

[ben m]

Frank Znidarsic, "Motion Constants", Transactions of the American Nuclear
Society, Vol. 83, November 2000

Real quack I mean Transactions of the American Nuclear Society thats basically Fortean Times right?!?

a) That's not a journal, that is a conference proceedings. All that your citation tells us is that Znidarsic gave a talk or a poster at a conference. Not usually a high bar for crackpots to clear---APS meetings, for example, accept all abstracts, and end up with whole sessions of 15-minute crackpot talks.

b) The American Nuclear Society is not an organization of nuclear physicists. It's an association of the nuclear industry---on the sciencey side that includes nuclear engineers, chemists who deal with fuel, but it also serves radiologists, nuclear power plant managers and technicians, etc.

 

[MattusMaximus]

I mean what CAUSES orbits to be quantized in discrete steps?

You do realize that the Bohr, or planetary, model of the hydrogen atom is only used in the most basic, introductory lectures on quantum mechanics, right? The Bohr model is not really a reflection of what physicists believe in terms of atomic structure; the more accurate view is the electron (or probability) cloud model.

 

[JCM]

I can explain where 1.094 Mhz m came from and how it can replace h can you explain the causation of a substitute for G? Even have a substitute?

 

[Skwinty]

You do realize that the Bohr, or orbital, model of the hydrogen atom is only used in the most basic, introductory lectures on quantum mechanics, right? The Bohr model is not really a reflection of what physicists believe in terms of atomic structure.

Mattus,
In all fairness, even though the Bohr model is about as relevant as the plum pudding model of Rutherford, orbitals are still in use as descriptors in the mainstream.

 

[MattusMaximus]

Mattus,
In all fairness, even though the Bohr model is about as relevant as the plum pudding model of Rutherford, orbitals are still in use as descriptors in the mainstream.

Oh, I know that; that is, it works well enough for hydrogen. Hell, I teach the Bohr model in introductory QM. My point is that if physics cranks are hell bent on taking down QM, then they should at least try keeping up with the currently accepted science.

 

[Skwinty]

Here is a link to cold fusion research in2010. http://www.physorg.com/news188377829.html

'Cold fusion' moves closer to mainstream acceptance
A new "calorimeter," shown immersed in this water bath, provides the first inexpensive means of identifying the hallmark of cold fusion reactions: the production of excess heat. Credit: Melvin Miles
A potential new energy source so controversial that people once regarded it as junk science is moving closer to acceptance by the mainstream scientific community. That's the conclusion of the organizer of one of the largest scientific sessions on the topic -- "cold fusion" -- being held in San Francisco for the next two days in the Moscone Center during the 239th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS).

Any credence in this progress?