The Zeitgeist Movement... why not?

How anyone can defend a system that see's 32,000 children die from starvation and preventable diseases everyday simply because there is no profit to be made is beyond me.
I don't know about anyone else in this thread, but I'm not defending the system, because the system has nothing to do with it. It's the people.

If people didn't want to see 32,000 children die every day, this system would let them solve that problem just as well as any other system. This system doesn't force people to be motivated by profit. People choose to be motivated by profit.

The Soviet Union tried to force people to be motivated by socialism, and yet plenty of people still chose to be motivated by proft. Communist Russia hosted a parasitic black market of epic proportions. And in the process of trying to force people to change their motivations, Communist Russia was responsible for some of the largest enslavements and mass deaths of any system devised by humans in all of recorded history.

And that's the problem with TVP: It assumes that if the system changes, people will change. But this has been tried before. Always, however good the system, there's always people around to mess it up.
 
Because we know enough history to realize every other system has resulted in far more.

So you think TVP will create more suffering, that is essentially what you are saying, right?

I strongly disagree.
 
Last edited:
Yes, TVP will create more suffering because it is so freaking unrealistic that it would be a disaster.
 
The transition of how we get from here to there will be problematic, I completely agree with that.
 
The TVP is an exercise in hand waving, and when that fails then just accuse those pointing out problems of defended the deaths of children.

It is a proposed system without number or actual plans, and an appeal to emotion to attack those who point that out.
 
I'm not going over all the points you made, because it's evident you need to do a touch of research.
:rolleyes:


>You need to consider the transition period. Initially there would still be crime, but it would decrease a massive percentage. Obviously not ALL crime is a matter of economics but a massive, massive percentage is.

What causes crime? Teenage angst, frustration, anger, envy, ideology and good old sociopathic sadism all cause crime. So please explain, because I've looked, where and how the TVP will eliminate those things after this so-called "transition period."

By the way, I love your use of the idea of a "transition period" because it's ironic given you are trying to distance TVP from Communism.

Hypothetically consider this.

We live in a RBE, and some nut job wants a monetary system, now consider how many problems would be involved in that? ten fold more problems and objections would arise.

It likely will not be a "nut job" and it will be proposed to regulate a black market for something that will surely arise.

I'm not saying TVP is perfect, but it is, in any way shape or form a hell of alot better than what we have now.

You mean the system that has more people enfranchised, with better access to clean water, food, vaccines and education than ever before in human history? It's "a hell of a lot better" than that system? That's a pretty big claim.

How anyone can defend a system that see's 32,000 children die from starvation and preventable diseases everyday simply because there is no profit to be made is beyond me.

You are missing the point that things are still a lot better now than they used to be under old systems and you are grossly distorting and simplifying things.

Not only in third world countries, the amount of suffering all around us, and a massive percentage is because of money.

So money is causing all the problems in third world countries but not in Norway or Denmark for some reason. Odd.

Seriously, what will it take before you consider any alternatives? 300,000 kids dying everyday?

So TVP will eliminate death? I think I read a short story once on people with immortality. They all went insane eventually. Are you sure you want to go down that road?

500,000? how many people need to suffer before you will even consider anything else?

Yes, the only reason we object to TVP is because we love suffering. It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that no evidence supports the idea that TVP would be any better and that it may just make things exponentially worse.:rolleyes:

What I see here on this forum is a lot of egocentricity.

Great, you broke my irony meter.:id:
 
I'm not going over all the points you made, because it's evident you need to do a touch of research. <snip>

Watched the movie, read every word on the ridiculous website, tired of all the dumb BS. Numbers. Give specific plans--with numbers, and calculations--that can be fact-checked. Fresco doesn't do that anywhere. The movie doesn't do that anywhere. The website doesn't do that anywhere. Sorry if I'm a bit short; you're just the latest in a long line of failures. And don't even think of telling us to go buy one of the books or videos. Put up or shut up.

As to the highlighted line: :i:

Nobody is claiming the present system is perfect, or even that it doesn't require a major overhaul. That is a strawman. And it's not our job to do your research for you. Show any actual evidence that any part of TVP is even possible, and you'll discover we're a lot less egocentric than you think.
 
I'm not going over all the points you made, because it's evident you need to do a touch of research.

No, it is obvious you are somewhat ignorant in the nature and writings of Karl Marx and Marxism. All the communism that has existed was all a "transitional period" towards a society without money or social stratification.

There are also the technical problems of claiming that a computer system can predict with the 100% certainty needed to prevent all scarcity.
 
Last edited:
It's nice that TVP has pretty much been taken over by the Zeitgeist gang. The Zeitgeist crew is so absolutely bonkers with their Conspiracy Crap that a few people who might have fallen for the TVP woo will have second thoughts.
 
It's nice that TVP has pretty much been taken over by the Zeitgeist gang. The Zeitgeist crew is so absolutely bonkers with their Conspiracy Crap that a few people who might have fallen for the TVP woo will have second thoughts.

Yeah it does limit the amount of people that will pay attention to it, and I read a lot less about the Addendum than I read about the first one. Occasionally someone will bring up TVP or TVP like ideas, usually from the same group that exists on every college campus. You know the ones. The group that will sit in the coffee shop debating how to solve societies problems, usually in the form of a dictatorship that they control. They usually come from lots of majors that don't include Science or any Social Sciences.
 
Good to see a healthy debate without people resorting to insults.

It's nice that TVP has pretty much been taken over by the Zeitgeist gang. The Zeitgeist crew is so absolutely bonkers with their Conspiracy Crap that a few people who might have fallen for the TVP woo will have second thoughts.

Curious, have you seen the evidence that nano-thermite was found in the rubble? I cannot post a link as I don't have 15 posts yet.

If you are interested search "nano thermite" in youtube.


>Not saying it definitely happened, but there is a lot of evidence to support that it was an inside job.

>And the extreme shadiness of building 7.

>Fact is, we simply do not know, that is why I find it difficult to understand people who are so very closed minded.

>Vietnam war clearly didn't need to happen....

Flavor, just wanted to go over one thing you said. "They usually come from lots of majors that don't include Science or any Social Sciences."

>From what I have seen, there are many people involved in science and engineering involved in TVP. Where are you getting your information from? Or are you again, making it up as you go along which seems to be a James Randi forum favorite.

Prometheus

"Watched the movie, read every word on the ridiculous website, tired of all the dumb BS. Numbers. Give specific plans--with numbers, and calculations--that can be fact-checked. Fresco doesn't do that anywhere. The movie doesn't do that anywhere. The website doesn't do that anywhere. Sorry if I'm a bit short; you're just the latest in a long line of failures. And don't even think of telling us to go buy one of the books or videos. Put up or shut up"


>Well, in regard to numbers and calculations, what is it you are after?
As for the plans, I'm sure you can respect the fact that the movement is in it's infancy. First step is awareness and the motion picture which isn't due til 2010.

>If you are going to start insulting me, just don't bother because I'll just ignore you.

Travis.

"What causes crime? Teenage angst, frustration, anger, envy, ideology and good old sociopathic sadism all cause crime. So please explain, because I've looked, where and how the TVP will eliminate those things after this so-called "transition period."

By the way, I love your use of the idea of a "transition period" because it's ironic given you are trying to distance TVP from Communism.

>If you look into it, a great deal of crime is money oriented, a massive percentage. Again, A lot of the abhorrent behaviors that you describe can be in connection with money. Granted, not all of it, those things will need to be addressed further down the road. In the future people will be more concerned for the well being of our neighbors and our community instead of the constant judging we see today. In connection with your question this also needs to be considered.

>I hope that answered your question, if not you will get a more detailed response at thezeitgeistmovement.com

>I do not understand how you link communism to the Venus project. If you fully understand the concepts of TVP and still want to call it communism, call it whatever you want to call it. It is essentially like nothing else that has been attempted.


Hypothetically consider this.

We live in a RBE, and some nut job wants a monetary system, now consider how many problems would be involved in that? ten fold more problems and objections would arise.

It likely will not be a "nut job" and it will be proposed to regulate a black market for something that will surely arise.

> I don't think a black market would arise.
Yes, there will be rare things that not everyone will be able to get instantly but it will only be a matter of time before these things and provided in abundance. Try and understand the concept of people working together, co-operating with each other, people in an RBE will have different attitudes. If you do not believe that, even in todays world we see alot of compassion for each other, thousands of hours of volunteering. If you are provided with the necessities of life, it will be in your best interest to cooperate with the community and not disrupt it. Yes, perhaps there will be exceptions, but the scale would be very low. This also needs to be considered in connection with question about crime.

I'm not saying TVP is perfect, but it is, in any way shape or form a hell of alot better than what we have now.

You mean the system that has more people enfranchised, with better access to clean water, food, vaccines and education than ever before in human history? It's "a hell of a lot better" than that system? That's a pretty big claim.

>Absolutely, evolution. It's just lagging a hell of a lot at the moment. A RBE is evolution.

How anyone can defend a system that see's 32,000 children die from starvation and preventable diseases everyday simply because there is no profit to be made is beyond me.

You are missing the point that things are still a lot better now than they used to be under old systems and you are grossly distorting and simplifying things.

> So just because your life is okay, and things are better than they used to be we should just accept that?

This is the whole point, there is no need for these things to be happening in todays world. And perhaps I shouldn't have brought up that statistic, but for gods sake just consider this for a moment. Adults and children starving to death!! perhaps if you saw this first hand you would change your views. Perhaps if you saw the crap people have to do just to survive you would change your views.

Not only in third world countries, the amount of suffering all around us, and a massive percentage is because of money.

So money is causing all the problems in third world countries but not in Norway or Denmark for some reason. Odd.

> You really are clutching at straws here.

Seriously, what will it take before you consider any alternatives? 300,000 kids dying everyday?

So TVP will eliminate death? I think I read a short story once on people with immortality. They all went insane eventually. Are you sure you want to go down that road?

> I really, really don't want to start a slagging match but this is just absolutely ridiculous.

500,000? how many people need to suffer before you will even consider anything else?

Yes, the only reason we object to TVP is because we love suffering. It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that no evidence supports the idea that TVP would be any better and that it may just make things exponentially worse.

> The first cities are being planned. The transition of how we get from here to there like I said before would be difficult, it could be done on a gradual process. No reasoning to suggest it would make things worse. Please, please do not jump straight back to communism.


> I suppose many of you have seen the critical review of zeitgeist by Edward Griffin.

Well, here is Peter Joseph's response on blogtalkradio . c o m.

If you click on the "popular" tab Peter Joseph is the first one in the list.

He also addresses many other questions.


Again, I apologize for my use of quotes.
 
<snip>

Prometheus...

>Well, in regard to numbers and calculations, what is it you are after?

For example, Fresco claims that the "carrying capacity" of the Earth is sufficient to provide everyone with everything they want. At the very least, this claim requires some sort of accounting of the average supply/demand of all resources, including the amount of work/energy/resources needed to move them from where they are to wherever they're needed. This would, of course, include estimates of how many so-called "distribution centers" need to be built, where they would be located, how big they would be, how much of which items/resources would be kept in inventory, etc.

Of course, this is a monumental task which would likely require thousands, if not millions, of man-hours even with fast computers, and even if it were ever done, it still wouldn't be even a tiny fraction of what would be required to make a decent case that TVP is even possible at all. Good luck.

As for the plans, I'm sure you can respect the fact that the movement is in it's infancy. First step is awareness and the motion picture which isn't due til 2010.

This is the single biggest problem I have with TVP, and it's the primary reason why it is so easy to assume that Fresco is either a raving lunatic, or a skilled con man (perhaps both). The real world just doesn't work that way. Try to name any other problem that has ever been solved by making a movie first. Fresco claims that TVP is to be science based. If that's true, then the first step is to do actual science, not make sci-fi movies, or pretty pictures, or theme parks.

>If you are going to start insulting me, just don't bother because I'll just ignore you.

<snip>

Don't accuse me of insulting you. Not a single word I've posted here can be interpreted by any reasonable person as a personal insult directed at you or anyone else posting here. I have called BS on stupid ideas that have been repeated in these forums by multiple proponents of TVP. If you feel that my calling these ideas stupid is insulting to you personally, then you might consider thinking about why you are (apparently) so personally invested in a non-existent and utterly impossible fantasy.
 
Flavor, just wanted to go over one thing you said. "They usually come from lots of majors that don't include Science or any Social Sciences."

>From what I have seen, there are many people involved in science and engineering involved in TVP. Where are you getting your information from? Or are you again, making it up as you go along which seems to be a James Randi forum favorite.

The main problem with your attempt at a gotcha up there is that you are purposely trying to imply that I wrote something other than what I really did. Is this combined with a pathetic accusal of "making it up as you go along" the level of debate that we can expect from you?

Oh, and here is the actual quote that you pulled that line out of, with no regard for context, to form your attempt at a gotcha statement.

Yeah it does limit the amount of people that will pay attention to it, and I read a lot less about the Addendum than I read about the first one. Occasionally someone will bring up TVP or TVP like ideas, usually from the same group that exists on every college campus. You know the ones. The group that will sit in the coffee shop debating how to solve societies problems, usually in the form of a dictatorship that they control. They usually come from lots of majors that don't include Science or any Social Sciences.

You see I was referring to the people I encounter on college campuses who promote TVP. So maybe you should actually learn to read the posts or at least put an effort into understanding the context. Either that or I will just assume you are not here to actually discuss issues, but to "promote awareness".
 
Last edited:
>If you look into it, a great deal of crime is money oriented, a massive percentage. Again, A lot of the abhorrent behaviors that you describe can be in connection with money. Granted, not all of it, those things will need to be addressed further down the road.

I see. So we're supposed to sign up for this radical reimagining of society because it might solve behavioral problems leading to crime at some indeterminate time in the future?

In the future people will be more concerned for the well being of our neighbors and our community instead of the constant judging we see today.

Well there's a lot of unsubstantiated dreaming. You know people will be more concerned about their neighbors and community how? This will be accomplished in what way?

>I do not understand how you link communism to the Venus project. If you fully understand the concepts of TVP and still want to call it communism, call it whatever you want to call it. It is essentially like nothing else that has been attempted.

I only link Communism and TVP because both promise the moon but fail to take into account human nature. Now Communism compensated for that by creating brutal authoritarian regimes that worked tens of millions to death as slave labor and directly executed millions more. How TVP will try and suppress dissent and make sure everyone is working for "collective good" is something I can only speculate about but it is unsettling to see the same rhetoric (such as of "transition periods") that was used by Communism being used to try and validate TVP.

> I don't think a black market would arise.

That's a big claim since there have been unregulated markets for as long as humans have had any sort of economy.

Yes, there will be rare things that not everyone will be able to get instantly but it will only be a matter of time before these things and provided in abundance.

So everyone will get an original Picasso? How will that work? As for me, as I alluded to earlier in this thread, I want an entire harem of Anne Hathaway clones. Would I be allowed to or would that be slavery? So now suppose that some guy hints that he can get me what I want (suppose I want the Picasso to impress the real life, non clone, Anne Hathaway) and all I have to do is give him 30,000 meal vouchers. To get the meal vouchers I trade a dangerous drug I happen to have to some creepy guy who got them by selling off a 13 year old girl to another guy who got them in who knows what way.

Now wouldn't it be safer to have something else (like a currency perhaps?) to trade for that Picasso than to have all this dealing with drugs and little girls? Yeah, only a nutbag would propose that.

Ultimately there is no way that everything that we may want will be provided, be it a pretty girl or a rare work of art, and some things are only valuable because they are rare and with abundance of one thing there will be a new market for something else. Lobster used to be practically given away but scarcity gave it a whole new market.

Try and understand the concept of people working together, co-operating with each other, people in an RBE will have different attitudes.

What evidence do you have that all you have to do is stick everyone, even the unwilling, in a RBE and their fundamental nature will change?

If you do not believe that, even in todays world we see alot of compassion for each other, thousands of hours of volunteering.

Some people have compassion. Some people volunteer. There are millions of others who sit on the couch all day drinking beers, hitting the kids and having sex with anything that moves. What you have to understand is that instituting a RBE world wide is very, very different than organizing one community of people who volunteered to be in it. They obviously wanted to be in a RBE but when you go world wide you will have millions, if not billions, that won't.


If you are provided with the necessities of life, it will be in your best interest to cooperate with the community and not disrupt it. Yes, perhaps there will be exceptions, but the scale would be very low.

I'm sure the community will feel very reassured when you let them know that the serial killer who's murdered 137 people only constitutes 0.001% of their population. I bet they won't even demand anyone catch the guy.:rolleyes:

This also needs to be considered in connection with question about crime.

The one that has no answer as of yet?

> So just because your life is okay, and things are better than they used to be we should just accept that?

I was talking about everyone. Compare Africa, for instance, now to Africa in 1909. Which time period had more people literate with access to clean water, medicine and democracy?

This is the whole point, there is no need for these things to be happening in todays world.

Who said they "need" to happen?

And perhaps I shouldn't have brought up that statistic, but for gods sake just consider this for a moment. Adults and children starving to death!!

Which is terrible but, it should be noted, that the vast majority of that starving is happening in areas with no effective government.

perhaps if you saw this first hand you would change your views. Perhaps if you saw the crap people have to do just to survive you would change your views.

Why do you assume I'm ignorant of it? Most of that starvation is happening in war zones like in Darfur. How would TVP stop the ethnic genocide happening in Darfur? Would they wander over and ask "pretty please" to the roving death squads of the Janjaweed to please stop it?

Travis said:
So money is causing all the problems in third world countries but not in Norway or Denmark for some reason. Odd.
> You really are clutching at straws here.

So, you don't think that money is the cause of the problems in third world nations? If so, I would agree with you. The problem in these places isn't western style capitalism it's a lack of western style capitalism.

> The first cities are being planned. The transition of how we get from here to there like I said before would be difficult, it could be done on a gradual process. No reasoning to suggest it would make things worse. Please, please do not jump straight back to communism.

How about I compare it to cults because you have the same sweeping promises, devotion to a nebulous cause and implications of widespread social engineering? Would you prefer that?
 
Menthol, yes I did read what you said and considered it.

Unless you have been to different colleges and listened in on different people having meetings about zeitgeist, asked them what they are majoring in, which seems very unlikely seeing as you're not interested in it at all, then it's bogus. Even people who are interested are having trouble meeting up at the moment. If you have done that, then okie dokie, my bad.

Don't be so defensive I'm not your enemy :)

Promethus

For example, Fresco claims that the "carrying capacity" of the Earth is sufficient to provide everyone with everything they want. At the very least, this claim requires some sort of accounting of the average supply/demand of all resources, including the amount of work/energy/resources needed to move them from where they are to wherever they're needed.

> Yes, good point. Fresco does claim that this but he also says a global survey of the worlds resources needs to be done, but this cannot be achieved until there is enough awareness and enough people support this direction. All the money spent on WW2, that is in combination with all nations, was enough to build schools and medical care for everyone, worldwide.


Originally Posted by pickles1 View Post
As for the plans, I'm sure you can respect the fact that the movement is in it's infancy. First step is awareness and the motion picture which isn't due til 2010.

This is the single biggest problem I have with TVP, and it's the primary reason why it is so easy to assume that Fresco is either a raving lunatic, or a skilled con man (perhaps both). The real world just doesn't work that way. Try to name any other problem that has ever been solved by making a movie first. Fresco claims that TVP is to be science based. If that's true, then the first step is to do actual science, not make sci-fi movies, or pretty pictures, or theme parks.

> Again, good point. To be fair, film and cinema have not been around very long, and if you don't have awareness and enough people supporting the direction then well, it's not going to work. As for the science side of things, Fresco has been inventing, researching and studying science his entire life. He has many, many designs, many have already been tested successfully. He's now 93 years old and he still makes a huge commitment to this movement, still designing, giving lectures, participating in radio broadcasts, so to call him a con-man is unfounded. Those pretty pictures are not just pretty pictures, Jacque has detailed plans and schematics for each and every one of them.


Inventions and Designs

* Systems for noiseless and pollution free aircraft
* A new aircraft wing structural system, patented by the US Air Force
* An electrostatic system for the elimination of sonic boom for Raymond DeIcer
* Boundary layer control and electrodynamic methods for aircraft control that dispenses with ailerons, elevators, rudders, and flaps
* A three-wheel automobile consisting of only 32 parts
* “The Aluminum Trend House,” a prefabricated house designed and developed for Mike Shore and Earl Muntz, 1945
* Designed and developed another prefabricated aluminum house for Major Realty Corporation in collaboration with Aluminum Company of America
* Developed numerous components and systems for architectural construction
* Developed equipment ranging from 3-dimensional x-ray units to electronic surgical instruments for the medical field
* Developed a technique for viewing 3-dimensional motion pictures without the use of glasses
* Designed and built a wide variety of reinforced concrete structures.



Travis.

If you look into it, a great deal of crime is money oriented, a massive percentage. Again, A lot of the abhorrent behaviors that you describe can be in connection with money. Granted, not all of it, those things will need to be addressed further down the road.

I see. So we're supposed to sign up for this radical reimagining of society because it might solve behavioral problems leading to crime at some indeterminate time in the future?

>Okay, as I keep saying, most crime is money oriented. A massive percentage of crime would disappear very quickly if we evolved into a RBE, if you do not agree with that then just think about the south American islands or the islands around Fiji where money does not exist, they don't have crime, everything is shared. There would be no need for prostitution, drug dealers, addicts etc etc. If peoples necessities are threatened they will do whatever they can to keep those things, that's not the difference between a good or bad person, that's just life. If you take a nice ethical rich man, take away all his possessions including his money, dump him in a deprived area he will do whatever it takes to survive. And Yes, perhaps I should move to some island around Fiji.

>As for the remaining percentage of crime, that is why the transition period will be difficult. These things are not going to be ironed out overnight obviously.



Originally Posted by pickles1 View Post
I do not understand how you link communism to the Venus project. If you fully understand the concepts of TVP and still want to call it communism, call it whatever you want to call it. It is essentially like nothing else that has been attempted.

I only link Communism and TVP because both promise the moon but fail to take into account human nature. Now Communism compensated for that by creating brutal authoritarian regimes that worked tens of millions to death as slave labor and directly executed millions more. How TVP will try and suppress dissent and make sure everyone is working for "collective good" is something I can only speculate about but it is unsettling to see the same rhetoric (such as of "transition periods") that was used by Communism being used to try and validate TVP.

>What exactly do you attribute to human nature? Other than our primal instincts? Very interested to see your reply to this.

>Under a communist regime, people are told what to do, where and how to live, all aspects of life is controlled and TVP is a million miles away from that.

>No new system, not even an absolute perfect system everyone agreed on could not have a "transition period".


Originally Posted by pickles1 View Post
> I don't think a black market would arise.

That's a big claim since there have been unregulated markets for as long as humans have had any sort of economy.

>Ok, let me try this again. I hope we can agree Travis, most people in society today are extremely restricted to..where they can visit, what activities they can be part of etc etc. Now in a RBE we have this massive amount of freedom that we have never had before, we can visit wherever we want , take part in any activity we want to... Now in such a world, do you really think people would be so concerned about... what? Solid gold house? Original picasso paintings? 10 bars of solid gold? own private jet plane?

>That's without the psychological side of why people are so very materialistic today, perhaps because we have to be, as we have always been in competition for whatever we have. I can't go into this though because I'm not well enough informed.



Originally Posted by pickles1 View Post
Yes, there will be rare things that not everyone will be able to get instantly but it will only be a matter of time before these things and provided in abundance.

So everyone will get an original Picasso? How will that work? As for me, as I alluded to earlier in this thread, I want an entire harem of Anne Hathaway clones. Would I be allowed to or would that be slavery? So now suppose that some guy hints that he can get me what I want (suppose I want the Picasso to impress the real life, non clone, Anne Hathaway) and all I have to do is give him 30,000 meal vouchers. To get the meal vouchers I trade a dangerous drug I happen to have to some creepy guy who got them by selling off a 13 year old girl to another guy who got them in who knows what way.

>Why do people take drugs? because they feel oppressed by society, socially isolated, trapped. Usually, the more deprived the area the more people on drugs. In such an open, free world with so much more possibilities for exploration and opportunity, people will ignore that fact, they wont be satisfied they will always want more, black markets will arise, money in some form will come back into the equation. I cannot accept that. This cynicism has no support in view of humanity’s technical and social development throughout history.

Now wouldn't it be safer to have something else (like a currency perhaps?) to trade for that Picasso than to have all this dealing with drugs and little girls? Yeah, only a nutbag would propose that.

>That's insane, how ironic is that in view of the monetary system, it's because of the monetary thousands of kids, adults are being sold for sex all over the world. To somehow suggest TVP could possibly, somehow make it worse I find just absurd.
 
Curious, have you seen the evidence that nano-thermite was found in the rubble? I cannot post a link as I don't have 15 posts yet.

If you are interested search "nano thermite" in youtube.

If you want to quickly discredit yourself around here using the words Nano Thermite and using youtube videos as a infallible source are two quick and sure ways to do it.
The Nano Thermite crap has been so throughly blown to kingdom come (no pun intended) in the 9/11 Conspiracy section here that is would be a waste of time to discuss it further. Just use the site search engine.
We have been dealing with 9/11 Conspiracy Insanity for a long time there, and I doubt you can come up with any new wrinkle that has not been considered and demolished.
 

Back
Top Bottom