Well lets see. So what is being written is that a high tech future society doesn't need specialized knowledge because it is high tech? This really doesn't make logical sense. The fact that anyone of the proposed mechanisms requires specialized knowledge should be obvious to must people. Also I love how the flaw in the AI was simply ignored. You know the one that deals with fundamental chaos in any deterministic system.
I also completely love the hand waving of the Austrian school of economic thought, because it is old. Well it is pretty accurate actually, and people of this economic school were able to notice that the economy would go in this direction. Not because of "evil capitalism", but because of manipulations of the system.
So what have we established here....
1.) Human competition cannot be eliminated.
2.) Social Stratification cannot be eliminated.
3.) The elimination of "money" does not remove resource costs.
4.) These resource costs still make much of the sci-fi tech of the Venus Project far out of the reach of human society, until they become cost effective.
5.) Specialization is necessary the more advanced a society is, and by eliminating it; progress will stagnate.
6.) Fundamental chaos within deterministic systems makes an AI running an entire society both impractical, and doomed to catastrophic failure.
Anyone else have some we can throw unto the list?