The WMD's May Have Been Found

Troll said:


Wel to be honest, at the rate you were going you should have stopped five minutes prior. Because if you think about it, which may not be applicable due to inbreeding, you wouldn't have replied as you did to said post. :p

I'm just kidding really. When I mentioned inbreds I really was just refering to the idiots that think a chemical weapon loses it's ability to be a wmd if it has a smaller range.

You weren't one of those idiots were you?
Click to expand...
You know, you really might want to rethink your position on that...

A weapon of MASS destruction should actually be able to do massive destruction., don't you think?
 
Zero said:
Yeah, unless your plan is to blow off my ass while you are doing it, in which case I would take my chances with the pain and humilation.Killing the patient to cure the disease is not exactly the most desirable method, is it?
Click to expand...

who is the patient, who is killing them? Be specific as I'm grading here
 
Zero said:
You know, you really might want to rethink your position on that...

A weapon of MASS destruction should actually be able to do massive destruction., don't you think?
Click to expand...

so a mortar round, armed with chemicals that can increase the range of damage caused, still doesn't make a wmd?

Are you even thinking through the first part of this, let alone the overall concept?
 
Again, I ask, define a WMD. How many people can a weapon kill before you call it such? Just one answer from any of you would be greatly appreciated
 
geni said:


Numbers of deaths is not the real issue after all MOAD it not consedered a WMD. If it is strategic then it and chemical or biological then it is a WMD (nuclear is always a WMD)
Click to expand...

define a WMD then.

That's what I've been asking

what makes a WMD. The best so far is that a mortar round with chemical compounds does not make a wmd. Not what I asked. Whjat does make a wmd?

And why can none of you answer that?
 
You see how this crap works?

"It's not a WMD if someone thinks it is and as such may supoport that president guy I don't like"

Is this really the best I can get from this site?
 
Troll said:
Again, I ask, define a WMD. How many people can a weapon kill before you call it such? Just one answer from any of you would be greatly appreciated
Click to expand...

Ok lets say ~10,000 in a normal urban enviroment.
 
Troll said:
Again, I ask, define a WMD. How many people can a weapon kill before you call it such? Just one answer from any of you would be greatly appreciated
Click to expand...

Better be alot, and all at once...or else a knife used repeatedly would be a WMD, and so would any firearm. We're certainly talking about more than mortars, since Iraq was actually allowed to legally have missiles.

Here's a question for you: Is tear gas a WMD?
 
geni said:


Ok lets say ~10,000 in a normal urban enviroment.
Click to expand...
That sounds about right...something that is an order of magnitude or two higher than artillery or anti-tank missiles or the like.
 
Troll said:
what makes a WMD. The best so far is that a mortar round with chemical compounds does not make a wmd. Not what I asked. Whjat does make a wmd?
Click to expand...


Tatical=not WDM

Strategic=WDM
 
Zero said:
Here's a question for you: Is tear gas a WMD?
Click to expand...

The real fun is to had is when you get onto percusor chemicals. I could in theory make a form of nearve gas from things you would find in almost every house (it migh time some time).
 
Zero said:


Better be alot, and all at once...or else a knife used repeatedly would be a WMD, and so would any firearm. We're certainly talking about more than mortars, since Iraq was actually allowed to legally have missiles.

Here's a question for you: Is tear gas a WMD?
Click to expand...

Tear gas does not destroy anything. It's a disperser at best. So no, it's not a WMD. But thanks for asking. I actually realize we disagree on more things than we agree upon, but you, Zero, have the balls to communicate and find answers without making them up as you go.
 
Zero said:
That sounds about right...something that is an order of magnitude or two higher than artillery or anti-tank missiles or the like.
Click to expand...

Need to be careful. Some of the fuel air weapons could do that if you used them in the right place.
 
The semantic argument about what is a WMD is stupid. If the story is true then those were BANNED WEAPONS, does not matter if they could have killed 10 million people or 100 people, Iraq was not supposed to have them now, nor 10 years ago by their own agreement to the terms of the cease fire.
 
geni said:



Tatical=not WDM

Strategic=WDM
Click to expand...

Bull.

mortars are tactical. Add chemicals to expand the harm and the nomenclature changes in accordance.
 
geni said:


Need to be careful. Some of the fuel air weapons could do that if you used them in the right place.
Click to expand...

FAE's are big convential weapons. Like a really big boom with little to no extra effect added to the damage they can cause from the immediate blast. Just like a single round fired from a single weapon.
 
geni said:


Ok lets say ~10,000 in a normal urban enviroment.
Click to expand...

so in your moind a weapon is not a WMD unless it can kill 10,000 people? Is that your final answer?
 
ssibal said:
The semantic argument about what is a WMD is stupid. If the story is true then those were BANNED WEAPONS, does not matter if they could have killed 10 million people or 100 people, Iraq was not supposed to have them now, nor 10 years ago by their own agreement to the terms of the cease fire.
Click to expand...

And you can put youe hand on your heart and tell me that your country has never posessed banned weapons? And has never broken and international treaty?
 
ssibal said:
The semantic argument about what is a WMD is stupid. If the story is true then those were BANNED WEAPONS, does not matter if they could have killed 10 million people or 100 people, Iraq was not supposed to have them now, nor 10 years ago by their own agreement to the terms of the cease fire.
Click to expand...

well that's only true if you follow international law. Some here seem to think other factors mustbe applied
 
Troll said:


Bull.

mortars are tactical. Add chemicals to expand the harm and the nomenclature changes in accordance.
Click to expand...

Not really. If you built a relly big morter like the germans did in WW2 then it would become stategic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom