• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The "Why CTists aren't dead" argument: A more thorough analysis

1337m4n

Alphanumeric Anonymous Stick Man
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
3,510
I will be shifting between two different versions of reality in this thread: actual reality, and the CTists' version of reality. When referring to the latter, I will use the term "CT Universe".


One particularly vocal critic of the 9/11 Truther movement is Maddox, pirate hero and author of "The Best Page in the Universe". His original attack against them was this article:

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

The central claim was that, if the CT Universe was reality, then the Truthers would all be dead. His argument:

1. The man in the picture above is Dylan Avery. To be more precise, the fact that Dylan, his friends, and family are alive, is proof that "Loose Change" is ********. He, along with a couple of his friends, created a 9/11 conspiracy video claiming that the US government and the military caused 9/11. Take a closer look at the last part of that last sentence: he's claiming that the US government, for whatever ends, killed nearly 3,000 innocent Americans, and tens if not hundreds of thousands of more lives in the conflicts that ensued because of it.

2. Since Dylan's arguing that the government has no problem killing 3,000 innocent people, this raises the question: if his documentary is true, and we've established that the government has no ethical qualms about killing thousands of its own people, then why wouldn't the government kill Avery and his friends as well? What's a few more lives to them to ensure the success of this conspiracy?

Whatever reason it may be that the government supposedly orchestrated this conspiracy, it must have been worth it to them to cause so much suffering and loss of life. So if there's any truth to this, then you can bet your ass that the government wouldn't let a couple of pecker-neck chumps with a couple of Macs and too much time on their hands jeopardise their entire operation by letting this stupid video float around on the Internet. I can picture you morons emailing me now: "BUT MADOX, MAYBE DYLAN POSTED IT ON THE INTERNET BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT HAD A CHANCE TO REMOVE IT LOL." Yeah, too bad this rebuttal is inconsistent with the premise of Dylan's ****-festival of a movie: that the WTC was brought down "in a carefully planned and controlled demolition ... and it was pulled off with military precision." Now we're expected to believe that the same government that was able to commit the largest terrorist operation in history--with military precision no less--is suddenly too incompetent to sniff out and shut down a little website set up by some college losers within days, if not minutes of its creation? The US government has the capability to monitor every electronic communication made anywhere in the world, yet we're expected to believe that they wouldn't be able to nix this kid long before his video ever became popular?

I win. There is no conspiracy. Eat my ****, losers.

Truthers, of course, had a ready response: that if they were to be killed, it would be too "suspicious". If all those "questioning" 9/11 suddenly disappeared, it would only cause even more people to question. This rebuttal was unique in that it was one of the few CT arguments to be accepted by even the skeptic/debunker community--very few debunkers have ever brought up the "why aren't CTists dead" point since.

I create this thread to revisit that argument, and to ask: Should we really be so quick to dismiss it? Should we accept the CTists rebuttal, just like that?

I think there are several flaws with the "killing us would be too suspicious" rebuttal:

1) In the CT Universe, I think it is fair to say that the government/NWO has proven time and time again that it doesn't give a [rule8] about not appearing "suspicious". This is evidenced by the fact that they felt that, for whatever reason, faking a plane crash (supposedly Flight 93) IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE--and planting debris far from the "crash site"--was worth the suspicion it inevitably aroused, that they felt that having a plane fly OVER the Pentagon instead of INTO it (or perhaps it was a missile) was worth the suspicion it inevitably aroused, that having the plane fly on the North side of the Citgo while the clipped light poles were on the South side was worth whatever suspicion it inevitably aroused, and that blowing up WTC7 was worth whatever suspicion it inevitably aroused. So clearly the government in the CT Universe is more than willing do things that are likely to create suspicion, in order to achieve its obscure goals. So, what's a little bit more suspicion to silence the most vocal of the Truthers and instill fear of questioning into everyone else?

"Taking care of" the Truther ringleaders would have the dual benefit of eliminating the pesky videos and books AND make other people afraid to ask questions if they believed they could be killed for doing so. You can tell from the habit of Truther forum moderators of banning everyone who disagrees with them that most Truthers are NOT exceptionally brave people, so if they knew they could be killed for voicing their views, they would probably shut up.

2) The government/NWO would not have to kill every Truther. It would only need to get rid of a handful of "ringleaders". If you've spent any more than a week debating Truthers, you should know by now that 98% of Truthers are just parrots, blindly repeating what the "Alpha Truthers" say. These ringleaders include figures such as Dylan Avery, John Doe, and Alex Jones. The majority of Truthers only believe in "the truth" because these people told them to, and not because they are thinking for themselves. Were the government to eliminate this handful of ringleaders, the entire Truth Movement would crumble.

3) "Taking care of" the Truthers wouldn't even necessitate suspicion, anyways. Certainly, if the Alpha Truthers were to "mysteriously disappear" NOW, it would arouse suspicion. But that's only because they've been preaching their message for years and years. But what if the government/NWO had taken care of these Truther ringleaders when they were just getting started, when they still had only a very small audience? Then, what little suspicion that would be generated would be limited to rather small groups of minor parrot-type Truthers, who would probably not even know that any other Truthers except for the one they had paid attention to had disappeared. The government/NWO in the CT Universe is supposeddly omnipotent and can listen to all the conversations going on all over the country, and has paid shills all over the Internet, so you can be pretty darn sure that if someone was asking too many questions, he would start being watched very, very closely. Thus, it would be easy to snuff out any conspiracy theories in their early stages, before they got to big to control.

4) Lastly, the government wouldn't even necessarily have to KILL the people who were causing it problems. In the CT Universe, the internet and even the real world are heavily populated by "shills" who do the government/NWO's bidding. Whatever method the government/NWO is using to control these people--brainwashing, mind control, or even just a really generous salary--could certainly be applied to the Alpha Truthers. All it would take is to get the Truther to come to some secret location, give him a little "chat", and then release him back into the wild. If the government can "control" people's minds and actions, why doesn't it just "control" the Truthers.

Thus, from Maddox's original argument, and from my 4 new arguments, it is my thesis that were the CT Universe reality, the "Alpha Truthers" would be either dead or brainwashed, and the remaining Truthers would either shut up out of fear or simply lose interest.

End of analysis.

Of course, the "why aren't Truthers dead" argument isn't conclusive PROOF that the conspiracy theory is wrong, but it is a pretty darn big ding against it.
 
There's a huge flaw with Maddox's website...




















He refers to Avery as a "college kid." :D

Steve S.
 
I would add that the best candidates for disappearing would be the ones closest to the real truth. If I were a NWO/government/Zionist making decisions, I would let the crazy theorists stand (making the movement lose credibility) but the ones who were really on to the people responsible and the actual methods they used, would be my primary targets. If I used thermite to destroy the towers, Judy Woods would live in peace but if I used space based energy beams, Judy Woods would be gone and the thermite people could spout their nonsense all they want. When the "no planes" people first surfaced, I recall suspicion among the “there was a plane” crowd in the ranks of the CT’s that this was a secret government plot to make the truthers look stupid, that they had been infiltrated by the NWO. Their paranoia and delusional thinking make infighting inevitable and it can be quite entertaining.
 
Wonderful analysis, your l33t sk3pt1c4l skillz are showing. But I'm curious about this bit:

Truthers, of course, had a ready response: that if they were to be killed, it would be too "suspicious". If all those "questioning" 9/11 suddenly disappeared, it would only cause even more people to question. This rebuttal was unique in that it was one of the few CT arguments to be accepted by even the skeptic/debunker community--very few debunkers have ever brought up the "why aren't CTists dead" point since.

Really, whenever I heard that tripe, it just confirmed my beliefs of their paranoid delusions, just adding a little egotism. ("The Illuminati NWO Zionist Jews can't kill us! People would notice, the truth will win out, the conspiracy would be revealed! We're OH SO important!" etc) I've never given it much thought beyond that.
 
why aren't they dead? Because bullets are more expensive than beer.

This month's language award winner was brought to you by ME, Unsecured Coins. I'll be awaiting my engraved plaque shortly.
 
Debunkers don't bring up Maddox's argument much because it goes nowhere. It's a good argument for people who aren't on top of the details of the conspiracy theories, just like the "Wouldn't there have to be thousands of people in on the plot?" or "Why do they fireproof steel then?" are good, but unlikely to win a debate against the True Believers.

I don't think anybody here believes that Alex Jones is not in a FEMA death camp right now because the government knows that he's too big a name. It's because they haven't got FEMA death camps for political prisoners. Yet. ;)
 
Couldn't the Nwluminatiburgers just kidnap them for a day or so and hit them with the mind control and release them to either denounce the movement or come up with even crazier ideas?
 
Couldn't the Nwluminatiburgers just kidnap them for a day or so and hit them with the mind control and release them to either denounce the movement or come up with even crazier ideas?

Can I get an Nwluminatiburger with cheese?
 
Here is the reply to the truthers reply to maddox, in a nutshell...

You can't even get a reporter worth his salt to pay attention to the story of the GOVT killing 3000 of its own people, and you think a few nobody kids and washed up professors going missing would be "too noticable"? WRONG...Try again.

TAM;)
 
I think there are several flaws with the "killing us would be too suspicious"

Add:

Since the only people who would be suspicious are, in fact, the truthers, then the problem of arousing suspicion by silencing truthers takes care of itself rather neatly.

Point made. Send my instructions to the usual place.
 
Send Jason Bourne after them, uhh.. before he got the amnesia and all.

Terminate, with extreme prejudice.

OK, I am mixing my movies, I will go now.
 
Couldn't the Nwluminatiburgers just kidnap them for a day or so and hit them with the mind control and release them to either denounce the movement or come up with even crazier ideas?

Can I get an Nwluminatiburger with cheese?


I would like to formally propose that Nwluminatiburgers be entered into the lexicon.

Someone call the OED
 
I think that argument is valid. I never read the CT's response to maddox's article, but I have read his article and that is what I thought. Killing them would only give them credibility. And with the large number of CT's who pay attention to Dylan his death would be noticed. Also the governments position concerning CT's has been to deny and ignore.
 
Of course it wouldn't be necessary to actually kill them

Bribery
False arrest
Warning, beatings and threats to desist
Threats to their immediate family and friends to desist

Historically evil police states have used these to control rebellious people, oddly none of this is used.

How hard would it be to pick up some of them or their immediate families on drug or other manufacturered charges?

Control by the "2nd degree" is also popular, in that you "disappear" a close relative/friend of say their mother....

The NWO could also revisit the Italian fascist trick of grabbing people they don't like and giving them a dose of castor oil...

It would seem the NWO doesn't know how to run a police state!
 
Last edited:
If done right they'd have no proof of it at all, especially actions of the 2nd and third degree
 
A truly smart NWO operative would never have these people killed. In the case of the LTW gang, we have a group of 20-somethings with a stereotypical teen rebellion thing going on.

Avery and Co. would be easily dealt with by planting a few kilos of marijuana in his house (or just finding his existing stash) and calling in an anonymous tip to the Oneonta sherrifs office.

The next day the headlines read: "Paranoid Tinfoil Hatter found smoking dope, no-one suprised".
 

Back
Top Bottom