Hallo Alfie
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 10,691
But, but, but .... wasn't the previous science peer reviewed?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
The warmers are becoming skeptics
- Thread starter Hallo Alfie
- Start date
- Status
Hindmost
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 3,307
Well, if you read the rest of the story...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100906085152.htm
Model
"The innovative aspect of our method is that we simultaneously matched the current changes in the ice mass and glacial isostatic adjustment to the observations, instead of assuming that a particular glacial isostatic adjustment model is correct," says Dr Vermeersen. "For Greenland in particular, we have found a glacial isostatic adjustment model that deviates rather sharply from general assumptions. But at present there are too few data available to verify this independently. A more extensive network of GPS readings in combination with geological indicators for the local and regional changes in sea level changes around Greenland over the last 10,000 years, will possibly be able to provide conclusive evidence on this matter in the years to come."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100906085152.htm
Model
"The innovative aspect of our method is that we simultaneously matched the current changes in the ice mass and glacial isostatic adjustment to the observations, instead of assuming that a particular glacial isostatic adjustment model is correct," says Dr Vermeersen. "For Greenland in particular, we have found a glacial isostatic adjustment model that deviates rather sharply from general assumptions. But at present there are too few data available to verify this independently. A more extensive network of GPS readings in combination with geological indicators for the local and regional changes in sea level changes around Greenland over the last 10,000 years, will possibly be able to provide conclusive evidence on this matter in the years to come."
lomiller
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
- Messages
- 13,208
Meanwhile that ice just keeps a melting...
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.000.png
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
Holy thread zombie, Batman!
We have a knee-jerk conservative grasping onto an utterly unproven (and perhaps unprovable) theoretical study to claim that Global Warming is a HOAX!
ETA: These guys don't LIKE computer models until they appear to "help" their "side."
We have a knee-jerk conservative grasping onto an utterly unproven (and perhaps unprovable) theoretical study to claim that Global Warming is a HOAX!
ETA: These guys don't LIKE computer models until they appear to "help" their "side."
Last edited:
bit_pattern
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,406
bit_pattern
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,406
Holy thread zombie, Batman!
We have a knee-jerk conservative grasping onto an utterly unproven (and perhaps unprovable) theoretical study to claim that Global Warming is a HOAX!
ETA: These guys don't LIKE computer models until they appear to "help" their "side."
Since when have these people been restrained by the shackles of logical consistency?
And even if these projections prove to be 100% accurate all it would mean is that we'd have a 70cm sea level rise by 2100 instead of a 100cm rise, which is still devastating by anyone's standards, so it's hardly a blow against GW "alarmism" or anything.
Last edited:
- Status