The ENTIRE building did not fall at FFA. This is a lie.
Only a PORTION of the North Face did.
About 1/3rd the way down the page.
I never said it fell 100% at free fall, I quoted NIST’s report that 105 feet, or 8 stories of the total 47 stories collapsed at pure free fall – that’s 20% of the building’s height that fell at the speed of an object dropped over the side of a building and falling through nothing but air!
And the reality of this admission by NIST is – it is a physical impossibility for 8 massive football field sized floors of a steel framed structure to drop 105 feet at pure free fall – that is, without some well placed and synchronized cutter charges.
And yet, not a single one of them has published a paper proving NIST wrong with math, or physics, or anything.
Yes, I am asking for a paper that is published in something other than bentham, or JONES.
The papers published by the government drones are mostly fluff, with contradictory nonsense pumped up with helium to appear scientific, and appear to prove something, which they do not. The bottom line of all of these wonderful papers is, "a Global Collapse ensued" - great stuff!
They do not prove how diesel and office contents fire can produce molten steel, which was reported by numerous first responders and reporters on the scene, as steel needs 1000 degrees greater temperature than the temperatures that NIST has admitted were present – NIST accounts for this temperature discrepancy by denying the numerous reports of molten steel, to wit: – John Gross and his disingenuous statements that “I never heard of anyone mentioning molten steel”. What a bald faced liar – there are numerous written and recorded report of exactly that – molten steel in the basements of all 3 towers.
And they do not prove how the admitted free fall of WTC7 could have happened, because they would have to re-write Newton's Laws first, and then make up some nonsensical new theory, like their quietly retired "Thermal Expansion" theory... or their "Pancake Theory"... remember those knee-slappers?.
What building collapse was symmetrical?
Are you serious? Do you know what symmetrical means?
All 3 “collapses” were symmetrical. It almost makes some sense with WTC1 and WTC2, as the buildings were in themselves, symmetrical, or square, lending themselves to a symmetrical failure.
But WTC7 was asymmetrical, a trapezoid of 330 feet on the long side, and 140 feet on the 2 short sides. For this asymmetrical structure to collapse symmetrically calls for a failure of all steel columns, simultaneously, or it would have crumbled on edge, and then fallen horizontally – which by the way NIST actually called the collapse a horizontal collapse, when all videos show a vertical collapse, straight down, not side to side.
Which yeilded more energy than thermite of any flavor does.
What types of chemicals were used is open to discussion, there may have been a new unknown chemical used along with some conventional stuff – if it’s the government, they have access to military inventions that we find out about 10 years after they have already used them. However, protected samples of WTC dust have been analyzed to contain unreacted Nano Thermite, a compound of extreme velocity and heat, and available only from government labs.
Didn't fall straight at all. Hit two other buildings.
It fell as straight down as the very best of controlled demolitions that have ever been performed. It did not hit “two of the buildings”, the Verizon Building on its West side, and the US Post Office building on its East side incurred only very minor cosmetic damage, mostly from the debris from WTC1, and are still in use today after minor repairs. The 47 story WTC7 was reduced to a 3 story heap in 7 short seconds, 20% of which were actual free fall
No aircraft, correct. However, the fires that burned more than 3.5 times the rating of the SFRM. It also showed signs of structural instability earlier in the day.
The fires moved from fuel source to fuel source, burning themselves out as they moved to other areas, Once the fire moves on, the steel returns to normal temperatures rapidly, as steel is an excellent conductor of heat. No fire burned in one spot long enough to elevate the steel to anywhere near failure mode.
Well, get on it!!
It’s on, baby
