• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Valley of the Wood Apes

Status
Not open for further replies.
She has shifted the burden of proof to the skeptics. She demands that everyone read what NAWAC is saying and then offer a plausible explanation.

Slick Frontman Brian Brown found a way to pick her locks. But that can only happen when the locks are no good.
 
The Shrike said:
It's a bloviating mess of over 200 pages of BLAARGarbage. I can't see what anyone would find compelling in that document or in the project. I'm at a complete loss to explain Sharon's warm fuzzies about it, and I went to her site and posted so.

It's the same crap over and over and over. Do we need a new metaphor? This is drowning a bowl of spaghetti beneath a bathtub of tomato juice rather than dressing it with 2 tablespoons of flavorful, basil-infused marinara.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I went and read your comment, then noticed the rather nitwitted one that replied, then read a few more comments that seemed to be giving this . . . paper the benefit of the doubt.

Is everyone on dope?
 
William Parcher said:
She has shifted the burden of proof to the skeptics. She demands that everyone read what NAWAC is saying and then offer a plausible explanation.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure she's overlooking the most plausible explanation of all. Old Grey? Bright eyes? Geez, c'mon.

Slick Frontman Brian Brown found a way to pick her locks. But that can only happen when the locks are no good.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure they've done a footie podcast together.
 
Squatchy McSquatch said:
Drew The Authors were foolish not to use your drawings. Your artwork makes me truly sympathetic to BF and his plight.

Poor Gablemp. He can never catch a break.

Here are words of wisdom from co-author Kathy Strain:"Hey, knowledge is power and power is more than 2 pages.... Read it - you will learn a lot of knowledge!"

What does this mean, exactly?
Click to expand...
That Kathy Strain's condescension knows no bounds ;)
 
Last edited:
Gawdzilla said:
So she admits she doesn't have one?
Click to expand...
Seems that way. Basically she says that if they were being hoaxed it would not go on as long as it has and in the ways that it has.

She has no more ideas than that? Did she forget to wear her critical thinking hat?
 
William Parcher said:
Seems that way. Basically she says that if they were being hoaxed it would not go on as long as it has and in the ways that it has.

She has no more ideas than that? Did she forget to wear her critical thinking hat?
Click to expand...

You forget that she had something to gain by the one case being true. She doesn't care what the truth is because she gains from the falsehoods.
 
Resume said:
I'm pretty sure they've done a footie podcast together.
Click to expand...
Lesson 1: Never ever trust a Bigfooter.

If you collaborate with them they will use it to their advantage. Befriending or working with a Bigfooter will cause skepticism to be prostituted within Bigfootery.

Never ever trust a Bigfooter. Never ever.
 
William Parcher said:
Lesson 1: Never ever trust a Bigfooter.

If you collaborate with them they will use it to their advantage. Befriending or working with a Bigfooter will cause skepticism to be prostituted within Bigfootery.

Never ever trust a Bigfooter. Never ever.
Click to expand...

Now Brian Brown is adding his commentary to the peanut gallery. I don't like the look of this at all.
http://doubtfulnews.com/2015/03/fou...-intriguing-and-unexplained-results/#comments


Brian Brown said:
You don’t know me (or anyone else involved) but I can assure you that’s not the case. As the paper states, there are quite a few behavioral attributes we now ascribe to apes that were not the case early on. We approach our work with a fair and reasonable amount of skepticism.
Click to expand...
 
He'll take a beating the comments there, but can't handle it in here...
 
You would have to be certifiably daft to know the history of Bigfoot & Bigfooting and still be able to give the benefit of the doubt to folks like the NAWACs. Is it because they don't have a southern accent? It's gotta be something like that since it's not about any "factualities". They've supplied the same amount of real world Bigfoot evidence as anyone else who's ever claimed the same lunacy, NONE. Yet, in a trend that's unmistakable in its stupidity, WE'RE now the bad guys for not capriciously disavowing our skepticism (empiricism) and offering up similar sympathies to essentially a bunch of Internet trolls who vacation in Oklahoma and who don't actually have or do anything Bigfoot except verbalize lunatic Bigfoot claims as a group. Talk about AMAZING!

Anyone care to explain what the **** makes lying as a member of NAWAC so much more desirable than lying as simply a member of society? Is it the free firewood?
 
Last edited:
The stupidity of the footers, the ghosters, the UFOols, etc., can be documented by the amount of pandering we see on the TV. People hunt bigfeets all season and don't find it. The viewers can't wait for season 2.
 
"We approach our work with a fair and reasonable amount of skepticism." Like hell. You guys are Bigfooters so your skepticism is a phony pretend game. Who do you think you are fooling? Oh right, you fooled Sharon.
 
What I don't understand is that Sharon seems to be completely discounting dishonesty. Why does she believe everything they say? I just assume most of them are lying or exaggerating.

A rock was thrown on the roof by an unknown tosser? How do we know that when all we see is a rock sitting on the roof? I don't grant any premise presented by anyone in NAWAC or footers in general. Otherwise I will assume one of them threw the rock just as easily as anyone or anything else.
 
Lets see Sharon's a pro "skeptic" blogger and Brian's got a product to sell....I can't think of a better salesman for your NAWACKY world of Bigfoot than an attractive, well spoken, respected? skeptic.
Blogger...Blagger....Blagger.... Blogger...match made in heaven!
 
Last edited:
It must always be understood that BLAARGing is a conspiracy in which all of the Bigfooters understand how to proceed conspiratorily even when the guidelines are completely unspoken. A conspiracy where the conspiracy is not discussed by the conspirators.

This is Critical Thinking 101.
 
William Parcher said:
It must always be understood that BLAARGing is a conspiracy in which all of the Bigfooters understand how to proceed conspiratorily even when the guidelines are completely unspoken. A conspiracy where the conspiracy is not discussed by the conspirators.

This is Critical Thinking 101.
Click to expand...


The first rule of BLAARG Club is: You do not talk about BLAARG Club.
The second rule of BLAARG Club is: You do not talk about BLAARG Club.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom