Chris_Halkides
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Messages
- 12,614
In his discussion of the vaccine recommendation document that HHS sent to congress, Dr. David Weinberg wrote, "To the best of my knowledge this is the only available statement elucidating the rationale for change in vaccine recommendations. It is a flawed and problematic document.
- It is a very brief justification for a significant policy change
- The reasoning is based on poor-quality sources that are not well suited to identifying or quantifying risk, such as VAERS and JADER.
- A non-peer reviewed study is cited.
- There is a rogue un-numbered, un-cited reference.
- Decisions are informed by misinterpretation or misrepresentation of cited studies.
- Higher quality studies better suited to identifying and quantifying risk are not acknowledged.
- The benefits of the vaccines are not mentioned in assessing the public health implications of these decisions."