The Truth about RFK Jr

In his discussion of the vaccine recommendation document that HHS sent to congress, Dr. David Weinberg wrote, "To the best of my knowledge this is the only available statement elucidating the rationale for change in vaccine recommendations. It is a flawed and problematic document.
  • It is a very brief justification for a significant policy change
  • The reasoning is based on poor-quality sources that are not well suited to identifying or quantifying risk, such as VAERS and JADER.
  • A non-peer reviewed study is cited.
  • There is a rogue un-numbered, un-cited reference.
  • Decisions are informed by misinterpretation or misrepresentation of cited studies.
  • Higher quality studies better suited to identifying and quantifying risk are not acknowledged.
  • The benefits of the vaccines are not mentioned in assessing the public health implications of these decisions."
 
At Inside Medicine Jeremy Faust reported that Senator Bill Cassidy called for the ACIP vote to be posponed. CNN stated, "“Although the appointees to ACIP have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology,” Cassidy wrote on X on Monday. “In particular, some lack experience studying new technologies such as mRNA vaccines, and may even have a preconceived bias against them.” He further said that the meeting should not take place when there is no permanent CDC director."
 
Last edited:
CNN reported on the ACIP: "The presenter, Lyn Redwood, is a nurse practitioner with experience in pediatrics and family medicine, according to a bioposted on Children’s Health Defense’s website, which notes she is president emerita of the organization. She previously served as president of the World Mercury Project in 2016, which “expanded its mission” two years later to become Children’s Health Defense, which was founded by current US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr...Redwood’s scheduled presentation to the CDC vaccine advisory committee is unusual. Typically, presenters are members of the ACIP working groups who have spent months gathering and discussing evidence on a given topic."
 
CNN reported on the ACIP: "The presenter, Lyn Redwood, is a nurse practitioner with experience in pediatrics and family medicine, according to a bioposted on Children’s Health Defense’s website, which notes she is president emerita of the organization. She previously served as president of the World Mercury Project in 2016, which “expanded its mission” two years later to become Children’s Health Defense, which was founded by current US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr...Redwood’s scheduled presentation to the CDC vaccine advisory committee is unusual. Typically, presenters are members of the ACIP working groups who have spent months gathering and discussing evidence on a given topic."
There is some phrase about lunatics and asylums this reminds me of, its on the tip of my tongue....
 
CNN reported on the ACIP: "The presenter, Lyn Redwood, is a nurse practitioner with experience in pediatrics and family medicine, according to a bioposted on Children’s Health Defense’s website, which notes she is president emerita of the organization. She previously served as president of the World Mercury Project in 2016, which “expanded its mission” two years later to become Children’s Health Defense, which was founded by current US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr...Redwood’s scheduled presentation to the CDC vaccine advisory committee is unusual. Typically, presenters are members of the ACIP working groups who have spent months gathering and discussing evidence on a given topic."
A presentation to an empty room, by all accounts.
 
The New York Times indicated that the panel is now down to seven members. The NYT wrote, "The Vaccine Integrity Project, a new initiative at the University of Minnesota to counter vaccine misinformation, noted in a blog post on Monday that, despite a widening measles outbreak, the committee’s agenda did not include a discussion of the benefits of measles vaccination, and that subject matter experts had not vetted the presentations. “These are clear signs,” the blog post said, “that the true intent of the meeting is to sow distrust about the safety of vaccines.”"

The Vaccine Integrity Project wrote, "In the 2023-24 season, the CDC estimates "that flu vaccination prevented 9.8 million flu-related illnesses, 4.8 million medical visits, 120,000 hospitalizations, and 7,900 deaths." Even so, in that same respiratory virus season, for example, more than 200 children died from flu, over 80% of whom were unvaccinated."
 
Face it: Public health in the USA is now run by AI and based on magical thinking:
Presentation for CDC advisers appears to cite nonexistent study to support claims about risk of vaccine preservative (CNN, June 25, 2025)
A presentation slated to be shared at this week’s meeting of vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claimed that a study in animals suggested that use of the vaccine preservative thimerosal can have “long-term consequences in the brain.”
But the study doesn’t appear to exist.
(...)
Berman did publish a paper with a similar title in 2008, but it was in a different journal and involved different animals. It also came to dramatically different conclusions.
 
RUIZ: Did you read the report and fact-check its sources prior to publication?

RFK JR: I did not fact check

RUIZ: It included citations to sources that don't even exist. How does that happen?

RFK JR: All of the foundational assertions in that report are accurate

RUIZ: They did not exist. How can they be accurate?

 
Politico reported, "The United States won’t contribute anymore to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, until the global health organization has “re-earned the public trust,” U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Wednesday. In an inflammatory video speech delivered to the Gavi pledging summit, seen by POLITICO, Kennedy accused Gavi of neglecting vaccine safety, making questionable recommendations around Covid-19 vaccines and silencing dissenting views...Kennedy also criticized what he alleged are Gavi’s “questionable recommendations encouraging pregnant women to receive Covid-19 vaccines.”...“Business as usual is over, unaccountable and opaque policymaking is over. I invite all of you to join us in a new era of evidence-based medicine, old-standard science and integrity,” he added."
 
Last edited:
Politico reported, "The United States won’t contribute anymore to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, until the global health organization has “re-earned the public trust,” U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Wednesday. In an inflammatory video speech delivered to the Gavi pledging summit, seen by POLITICO, Kennedy accused Gavi of neglecting vaccine safety, making questionable recommendations around Covid-19 vaccines and silencing dissenting views...Kennedy also criticized what he alleged are Gavi’s “questionable recommendations encouraging pregnant women to receive Covid-19 vaccines.”...“Business as usual is over, unaccountable and opaque policymaking is over. I invite all of you to join us in a new era of evidence-based medicine, old-standard science and integrity,” he added."
Moron.
 
Politico reported, "The United States won’t contribute anymore to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, until the global health organization has “re-earned the public trust,” U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Wednesday. In an inflammatory video speech delivered to the Gavi pledging summit, seen by POLITICO, Kennedy accused Gavi of neglecting vaccine safety, making questionable recommendations around Covid-19 vaccines and silencing dissenting views...Kennedy also criticized what he alleged are Gavi’s “questionable recommendations encouraging pregnant women to receive Covid-19 vaccines.”...“Business as usual is over, unaccountable and opaque policymaking is over.
I invite all of you to join us in a new era of evidence-based medicine, old-standard science and integrity,” he added."

Do I really need to do the obligatory line from The Princess Bride? Really?
 
Yahoo News reported, ""Unfortunately, in its zeal to promote universal vaccination, it [Gavi] has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety," he [Secretary Kennedy] added." IMO both safety and benefits should be weighed when considering vaccination programs; in other words the risks and the benefits should be weighed.
 
Last edited:
Earlier this year at SBM Dr. Steven Novella discussed the appeal to nature fallacy, a fallacy that I mentioned in passing in comment #1914 earlier today. He wrote, "Rhetorically, the appeal to nature fallacy has also risen to a full-blown conspiracy theory in some forms. The narrative here is that nature has already provided everything we need to be perfectly healthy, but evil industry (Big Pharma, mainstream medicine, whatever) and their regulatory puppets have tried to deprive the public of the benefits of nature so they can sell more artificial treatments and products. The irony here is that it is the wellness/self-help/snake oil industry that is distorting reality for their own financial bottom line. One of their main champions, RFK Jr, is about to take charge of American healthcare."

Does he believe in abiotic petroleum or something? The vast majority of petroleum is dead plants, the rest animals; hence fossil fuels.

He can replace those unnatural red dyes with cochineal. Dead bugs.
 
RFK Jr. vs. Peter Hotez:

Secretary Kennedy on X, June 25, 2025
In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, @gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety. When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, it has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, GAVI partnered with the World Health Organization to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and to stifle free speech and legitimate questions during that period.
GAVI should consider the best science available, even when that science contradicts established paradigms. It should define success not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.
I call on GAVI to re-earn the public trust and to justify the $8 billion dollars that America has provided in funding since 2001. Until that happens the United States won’t contribute more to GAVI. Business as usual is over.
(With a video, 3:44 min.)


Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD DSc(hon) on X, June 26, 2025
Mr. Kennedy is wrong. Here’s my analysis of the health impact of the @gavi alliance in saving under 5 child deaths, based on newest open access
@IHME_UW estimates. The numbers = under 5 child deaths since Gavi was launched in 2000 to 2021. % reduction in deaths in parentheses.

Image
 
The Guardian reported, "Gavi is a partnership between public bodies and the private sector that works to provide vaccines in many of the world’s poorest countries. It has prevented an estimated 18.8 million deaths, and hosts global emergency stockpiles against Ebola, yellow fever, meningitis and cholera. The US has long been one of its major funders, and provided around 13% of its budget. Gavi announced after a pledging event on Wednesday that it had secured more than $9bn in donations for the next five years, and would continue to chase the $11.9bn total it required...Gavi set out a detailed rebuttal to Kennedy’s claims, stressing that its “utmost concern is the health and safety of children”."
 
Last edited:
CNN reported on the ACIP: "The presenter, Lyn Redwood, is a nurse practitioner with experience in pediatrics and family medicine, according to a bioposted on Children’s Health Defense’s website, which notes she is president emerita of the organization. She previously served as president of the World Mercury Project in 2016, which “expanded its mission” two years later to become Children’s Health Defense, which was founded by current US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr...Redwood’s scheduled presentation to the CDC vaccine advisory committee is unusual. Typically, presenters are members of the ACIP working groups who have spent months gathering and discussing evidence on a given topic."
So she should be permanently stricken from any and all medical registers and be made stay at least ten miles away from any and all medical premises or venues where decisions affecting medicine take place.
 
So she should be permanently stricken from any and all medical registers and be made stay at least ten miles away from any and all medical premises or venues where decisions affecting medicine take place.
Maybe? But she appears to have conflicts of interest which RFK jr. said he would eradicate from the ACIP so she should probably be stricken from that.
 

Back
Top Bottom