The Trump/Putin summit predictions thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ohhh... Trumps calling a Press Conference at 2 P.M (Eastern) to "Talk about" the summit and "address statements made about it."

This outta be good.

crecent's predictions for the presser:

1) Starts at least 15 minutes late.
2) Fury
3) Only take questions from most friendly sources, answers bear no relation to questions asked anyway.
4) FAKE NEWS! mantra
5) Fury and Gibberish
6)Declare victory and leave.
 
crecent's predictions for the presser:

1) Starts at least 15 minutes late.
2) Fury
3) Only take questions from most friendly sources, answers bear no relation to questions asked anyway.
4) FAKE NEWS! mantra
5) Fury and Gibberish
6)Declare victory and leave.

You forgot: WHAT ABOUT HER EMAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
He'll fire Pence and introduce his new VP Pladimir Vutin who totally isn't Vladimir Putin in a wig and Groucho Marx glasses.
 
Last edited:
Nope, I meant Daddy Bush. Not sure WHY it was so low (it was toward the end of his term in office, but the charts on FiveThirtyEight don't offer any explanation for why the numbers got that low. See the comparison charts here (make sure you click on the 4 year option, not just the one that compares Trump to all the prior presidents simply up to the day in office Trump has served).

"Today I Learned" Nixon's approval ratings during Watergate were higher than Trumps. Also, WTF happened near the end for Truman?
 
"Today I Learned" Nixon's approval ratings during Watergate were higher than Trumps.

Here's a good one.

As of this morning, the Congressional Approval Rating is 18%. (and that's up from a low or 13% a few years back)

On the day America declared independence from Great Britain the percent of American Colonist who were still loyal to the crown was at least 20% and maybe as high as 40% depending on who you ask and how exactly they define it.
 
Last edited:
There's no mystery here, just a willingness to see the obvious:
Instead, Trump turned to a new source of other people’s money. He did a series of deals in Toronto, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Azerbaijan, and Georgia with businesspeople from the former Soviet Union who were unlikely to pass any sort of rigorous due-diligence review by pension funds and other institutional investors. (Just this week, the Financial Times published a remarkably deep dive into the questionable financing of Trump’s Toronto property.) He also made deals in India, Indonesia, and Vancouver, Canada, with figures who have been convicted or investigated for criminal wrongdoing and abuse of political power.
We know very little about how money flowed into and out of these projects. All of these projects involved specially designated limited-liability companies that are opaque to outside review. We do know that, in the past decade, wealthy oligarchs in the former Soviet Union and elsewhere have seen real-estate investment as a primary vehicle through which to launder money. The problem is especially egregious in the United Kingdom, where some have called the U.K. luxury real-estate industry “a money laundering machine.” Golf has been a particular focus of money laundering. Although the U.K. has strict transparency rules for financial activity within the country, its regulators have been remarkably incurious about the sources of funds coming from firms based abroad. All we know is that the money that went into Turnberry, for example, came from the Trump Organization in the U.S. We—and the British authorities—have no way of knowing where the Trump Organization got that money.
 
Here's a good one.

As of this morning, the Congressional Approval Rating is 18%. (and that's up from a low or 13% a few years back)

On the day America declared independence from Great Britain the percent of American Colonist who were still loyal to the crown was about 30%.

I remember my 7th grade history teacher saying something along the lines of: about a third of colonists were patriots, one third loyalists, and one third just wanted to get on with their lives.
 
CNN is reporting that it is not a press conference, but instead Trump meeting with members of Congress.

Trump will speak about his meeting with Putin at 2 p.m. today
From CNN's Kevin Liptak

President Trump will make remarks about his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin at 2 p.m. at the start of his meeting with members of Congress, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said.
 
The one thing of the whole Steele Dossier tale I've always discounted is the Pee Tape. Now? I've simply leap-frogged past it and am more than willing to accept that it's something far worse. Donnie Johnny would survive a "Pee Tape". We've seen the idiots and sycophants (sometimes idiot sycophants) in the GOP and voting for the GOP. A couple of hookers peeing.... bah it'd barely make the news.

No, I'm going off into A.M. Coast to Coast territory. They've got several million in loans from drug dealers and people traffickers, or him agreeing with an oligarch that the best solution to their purchasing needs would be if a certain competitor were to take the big dirt nap.
Yes, I’d dismissed the pee tape possibility some time ago, for pretty much the same reason as you.

As to your subsequent thinking, I agree it’s plausible, but would revelations to the effect really have any impact with the deplora-teers?

I’ve begun to consider that the peeing Russian hookers can be seen on camera with our hero. Intimately. And they are well underage.
 
crecent's predictions for the presser:

1) Starts at least 15 minutes late.
2) Fury
3) Only take questions from most friendly sources, answers bear no relation to questions asked anyway.
4) FAKE NEWS! mantra
5) Fury and Gibberish
6)Declare >furious< victory and leave.

FTFY
 
The one thing of the whole Steele Dossier tale I've always discounted is the Pee Tape. Now? I've simply leap-frogged past it and am more than willing to accept that it's something far worse. Donnie Johnny would survive a "Pee Tape". We've seen the idiots and sycophants (sometimes idiot sycophants) in the GOP and voting for the GOP. A couple of hookers peeing.... bah it'd barely make the news.

No, I'm going off into A.M. Coast to Coast territory. They've got several million in loans from drug dealers and people traffickers, or him agreeing with an oligarch that the best solution to their purchasing needs would be if a certain competitor were to take the big dirt nap.

Bumping a foreign national off? Nah, his supporters would even brush that one off. Now maybe, JUST MAYBE, a scandal in which he was helping illegals cross the border would piss off a few of them.
 
Oh right, how dare that upstart fire the greatest Generalismo the world had ever seen. Nuking Korea was a wonderful idea.

Nontheless he was inexplicably popular and the war turned into a morass stalemate from there out.

Truman really was not considered a 'good' President until some reevaluation of his legacy took place after his death. Then people were able to look back at his more lasting effects such as desegregating the military, etc.

I doubt Trump will have such a reevaluation, and if it does it will look even worse.
 
...Putin added, “But no, it would never occur to anyone that he would think of running for president. He never mentioned his political ambitions.”

Hold on there just a New York minute ---
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign,_2000

snippet -- "He named media proprietor Oprah Winfrey as his ideal running mate and said he would instantly marry his girlfriend, Melania Knauss, to make her First Lady."

Also, 2012.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/16/donald-trump-us-presidential-race



I was going to post that! "He never mentioned his political ambitions"? That's a lie of Trumpian proportions!
 
Not seeing the effect of Helsinki on polls yet. Trump voters are not ready to dump him until a conservative judge has been approved.

That's not an issue, Pence is waiting in the aisle and he's worse as far as picking SCOTUS positions from a pool of Evangelical extremists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom