• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: The Trump Presidency: Part 25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump Tweets

There is a nasty rumor out there that @SenatorCollins of Maine will not be supporting our great United States Supreme Court Nominee. Well, she didn’t support Healthcare or my opening up 5000 square miles of Ocean to Maine, so why should this be any different. Not worth the work!

Big T was not a reference to me, but rather to Big Tech, which should have been properly pointed out in Twitter’s Fake Trending Section!

Steve Scully of @cspan had a very bad week. When his name was announced, I said he would not be appropriate because of conflicts. I was right! Then he said he was hacked, he wasn’t. I was right again! But his biggest mistake was “confiding” in a lowlife loser like the Mooch. Sad!
 
See, here's an example. There is no evidence that is the goal of the CA GOP. Remember there is no question CA will vote for Biden. It isn't close and not subject to a serious challenge.

So is there a down ballot issue you think the GOP is going to challenge the votes on because of their own ballot boxes?


They've been told in no uncertain terms that these boxes are illegal, and any votes left in them will almost certainly be invalid as a result.

Their response was to double down on using the boxes.

That is not the response of an organization that was honestly trying to increase access to voting, but just made a mistake in interpreting the law.
 
"LOL you can't prove our illegal ballot boxes that we refuse to remove despite a court order have anything to do with us trying to effect the election."

My God what a wonderful world of Algonquin Round Table argumentatives we live in. Surely we are blessed to live in a such a gilded age of discourse.
 
"Donald Trump continues to trail his presidential challenger Joe Biden by as much as 17 points in the national polls and acknowledged his concern during his latest rally appearance in Des Moines, Iowa, on Wednesday night, telling his loyal crowd: "For me to only be up six [in Iowa], I'm a little bit concerned, I'll tell you that."

In a further sign of his desperation, the president later tweeted an astonishing plea to voters in the solidly-Democratic state of California, asking them “WHAT THE HELL DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE?” in voting for him."

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...e-in-voting-for-him/ar-BB1a2QOn?ocid=msedgdhp

Man, the phrase "What do you have to lose?" was not quite so ridiculous four years ago. Pretty easy to answer it these days.
 
Rudy will get his check from Trump, some day. Though not from Trump directly, he never pays. Fake Hunter Biden computer generated hundreds of social media site responses.

Wikipedia included an article linked to the Hunter page that covers the fake computer NY Post story. It will probably be removed. See under the Talk tab:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Biden–Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

There is a concept of "what does most media say" involved.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how Rudy will escape a charge of illegal lobbying and conspiracy except by dying at the right time.
 
Last edited:
Here's a poignant music video from the Lincoln Project.



It's like watching a music video based on footage from some dystopian TV series. My heart bleeds for the States.
 
This is one of the major downside to most everyone in politics being in the "Statistically died about 10 years ago" demographic. There's really no way to punish them.
 
More seriously one major issue is a whole lot of people have gambled a whole lot of wrong doing on hoping that Trump will just bail them out / cover it up / bury it / refuse to act /whatever.

When he leaves office there's going to be a lot of people with nothing to lose who suddenly have the rug pulled out from under them.

That's what scares me. A lot of people have a very, very vested interested in keeping Trump in power to save their own asses.
 
Oh my dear lord. This tweet will disappear soon, I think- the President of the United States just tweeted an article about Twitter shutting down completely, without any apparent awareness that the article is satire, and the Babylon Bee is a satire site, a conservative Onion wannabe. More evidence, if it's needed, that conservatives really don't quite get the concept of humor.

Well, there's the source. And then there's the fact that he TWEETED that TWITTER was shut down.
 
"LOL you can't prove our illegal ballot boxes that we refuse to remove despite a court order have anything to do with us trying to effect the election."

My God what a wonderful world of Algonquin Round Table argumentatives we live in. Surely we are blessed to live in a such a gilded age of discourse.

So far, I'm not outraged by the boxes. They are explicitly for ballot harvesting in GOP areas. Unless the harvesters break the law by not delivering every ballot harvested, then I don't see a necessarily nefarious plot. Ballot harvesting is legal in CA.

Of course, there is a big red flag that they are labeled as "official" sites, which is apparently (and reasonably) a crime. I won't defend the labeling or refusal to respond as demanded by the state AG (hope that's the right office).

And, of course, it's totally possible that there are some nefarious schemes for which we have no evidence. But ballots are sealed, so it can't be that they're tossing Democrat ballots out. Some have suggested it's for planted doubts in the election by tossing GOP ballots out and then "discovering" them, showing fraud. Totally could be, but I won't presume this is going on. Anyway, it's too late for that scheme to work now.

I understand that the GOP has worked hard to cast confusion into this election and so we should be chary with the benefit of the doubt. I'm still not willing to presume the worst I can imagine without some evidence.
 
So far, I'm not outraged by the boxes. They are explicitly for ballot harvesting in GOP areas. Unless the harvesters break the law by not delivering every ballot harvested, then I don't see a necessarily nefarious plot. Ballot harvesting is legal in CA.


Except that, as has been pointed out several times, they are ignoring the rules related to proper ballot harvesting. These rules are not overly complicated, but they still haven't managed to follow them.

This is like someone getting a ticket for not having working brake lights on their car arguing that "Hey, driving is legal!" It's a trivially true statement that completely ignores the actual issue at hand.

Not that we actually expect anything better from the Trump Party.
 
So far, I'm not outraged by the boxes. They are explicitly for ballot harvesting in GOP areas. Unless the harvesters break the law by not delivering every ballot harvested, then I don't see a necessarily nefarious plot. Ballot harvesting is legal in CA.

I was under the impression that in CA it's legal only if the voter puts the name of the person they have authorized to submit their ballot for them. Can't really do that when you don't know who is going to be collecting the ballots from those boxes.
 
If it's "assuming the worst" to claim that a party is just going to do what they are openly admitting they are attempting to do, I give up.

Again the Republicans aren't exactly hiding the fact that they are going to screw with this election. Even their apologetics and double-speak about it is sort of lifeless at this point.

There's "being fair" and "keeping an open mind" and then there's "Well the Democrats are saying the Republicans are going to screw with the election, but on the other hand the Republicans are saying the Republicans are going to screw with the election, so I don't know what to believe."
 
Last edited:
Because it fairly certainly is. Yes, I get that this is the Trump era, where Republicans openly and brazenly flout the law, but crime should not be normalized.
Way to miss the point.

Yes, and it was such a serious violation the boxes were immediately removed from private property and an investigation was started as to who to charge. :rolleyes:

Actually misrepresenting the boxes as "official", not the boxes themselves, may have been what was illegal. The GOP agreed to remove boxes labeled "official" and relabel them.


Are you of the crowd that only values things like electoral integrity and security when you think they will benefit "your side?" Similarly, Rule of Law? Should people stop being offended by rank hypocrisy in politics?
You do know which side I'm on, right? I think you need to look in the mirror.

I'm defending the GOP's side because they presented a rational argument that they were merely doing what the law allowed (harvesting ballots) and which the Democrats had done the previous year.


Either way, it sure looks like you've seized upon just ONE of the potential concerns - one of the less impactful and less likely ones, really - and are harping on it as if that's all anyone could possibly be concerned about.
I have seized upon the fact this is not the outrageous crime it is being portrayed as.

Was the goal to get Democratic ballots and toss them out? Or was the goal to make it easier for Republicans to vote, something legal in CA?


If you can't beat them, join them. LA Times: California officials say GOP’s ballot boxes are illegal. Republicans may expand the practice Sorry, it's paywalled after your monthly allotment of free articles but there are multiple sources of the story.
For years, Republicans across the country have decried the use of so-called “ballot harvesting,” arguing that laws that allow a third party to collect voters’ completed ballots serve as a breeding ground for election fraud. In California, the state’s Republican Party has taken Gov. Gavin Newsom and other officials to court over the practice.

Now, California’s GOP is defending its use of the very ballot collection law it once sued over....

At the center of the battle are questions of whether it is legal to collect ballots through third party boxes and also what constitutes an “official” ballot drop box. California law says a mail voter may designate another person to return their ballot....

A party spokesman told the Associated Press that they would stop labeling their ballot boxes “official” to avoid confusion and said that they may expand their use.


The issue:
According to experts, the use of third-party ballot collection boxes is not illegal, but the false designation of an “official” drop-off box is because the boxes are not sanctioned by election officials.
I don't know which experts they are citing.

The GOP contends the people putting their ballots in the boxes know who they are entrusting the ballots to given the locations of the boxes. They agree the boxes need to have more clear labeling.

Here's an example of a possibly misleading statement by the person interviewed:
Macías, of the Brennan Center for Justice, said that it would be one thing for a voter to designate a gun store owner as a person to return a ballot on their behalf, rather than a box in front of the store.
The GOP rep said the boxes were inside the stores. Correction: One box is pictured outside a church in the CNN article. There's no big label saying official collection box. That box was removed.


Besides labeling which the GOP has agreed to change, one's POV depends on how one views the GOP motives.
Macías said he believes that the GOP wants to bring attention to their opposition of the state law “by trolling election officials.”

“These tactics fit a familiar pattern of attempting to suppress voting,” he said. “Undermining confidence, creating confusion, spreading disinformation — these are forms of voter suppression. It lays a groundwork to later claim you can’t trust the voter results.”

Troll election officials to bring attention to disagreement with the law?

And/or undermine confidence in mail-in ballots?

Or how about, if you can't beat them join them? The fact these boxes were all in places GOP members of the public would be likely to put their ballots in the boxes, not places members of the public at large would put their ballots in them, suggests it's the last option.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be so quick to ascribe innocent motives to the GOP on anything. These ballot boxes could well be a means to nefarious plans. In a state that's assuredly lost to them at least as regards the Presidential vote, there's hardly a downside to sacrificing those collected votes if some 'accident' were to occur and thus give ammunition to a claim of 'uncertainty' in the result.

If we can imagine it, those scumbags will. And worse, because these are desperate times for them.

There are many down ballot issues the GOP may be aiming at.
 
Skeptic Ginger, thing is that no one here (beside rethuglican astroturfers, of course) trust anything done by GOP.
 
You're right, the California GOP haven't been clear what their motives for installing illegal ballot boxes are. Upthread, I offered a number of possible motives.

That said, if you're of a conspiratorial mindset, the GOP in California isn't going to be pulling up trees so why not sacrifice California (by dumping ballots) to create national doubt.
Yes they did make it clear. And your hypotheticals were not among them and not logical given the location of the ballot boxes.

This is exactly what I'm talking about, ignoring the information that is clearly available and going with the headlines and gut feelings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom