• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017 - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bjarne: A lie about resolving two other features of the Pioneer anomaly

Bjarne said:
The new theory solves both these anomalies / problems too
Click to expand...
30 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie about resolving two other features of the Pioneer anomaly - he cannot even predict the resolved Pioneer anomaly :jaw-dropp!
 
Bjarne said:
Lets start with the question in this post http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11515701&postcount=17
Click to expand...
Over 6 years of ignorance of basic science shows that you will probably never be capable of understanding the contents of the PDF and those 2 graphs.
They are simply graphs of the remaining parts of data ("residuals") after fitting with 2 different models.

The RR fantasy appearing on 15 October 2009 here, continued ignorance of high school level science and digging a pit of fantasies from Bjarne (185 items of ignorance, fantasy, delusion and lies in this thread alone!).
  1. 15 September 2016 Bjarne: You still do not understand the ISS and Galileo 5 and 6 tests!
  2. 15 September 2016 Bjarne: You still do not understand the real world where even if there are results that do not agree with GR, a delusion is still wrong!
  3. 15 September 2016 Bjarne: This is a lie because there were no Galileo 5 and 6 navigation errors.
  4. 15 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie of "2. Synchronize the clock" for GPS satellites [for SR and GR]
  5. 15 September 2016 Bjarne: A "many have begun to understand that something smells" lie.
  6. 19 September 2018 Bjarne: Launching satellites is nothing to do with a lie that GPS clocks have to synchronized.
  7. 19 September 2016 Bjarne: Repeated ignorance that GPS clocks are adjusted for SR and GR before launch.
  8. 20 September 2016 Bjarne: A repeated delusion that a "so significant" anomaly would not have already been detected by the GPS system not working !
  9. 22 September 2016 Bjarne: A list of the usual delusions, e.g. his imaginary "Perihelion Anomalies" !
  10. 27 September 2016 Bjarne: Attachment lying about the perihelion "precisions" anomaly of Mercury - wrong units and amount.
  11. 27 September 2016 Bjarne: Attachment with the gibberish of "change of the free fall geodesic path" about the perihelion "precisions" anomaly of Mercury to try to explain that it is wrong!
  12. 27 September 2016 Bjarne: Imagining that the RR/dark flow delusion can calculate the perihelion precession of Mercury will not show that GR is wrong.
  13. 29 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie about "we" having evidence for the RR/dark flow delusion.
  14. 29 September 2016 Bjarne: A list of delusions and lies are evidence against the RR/dark flow delusion.
  15. 29 September 2016 Bjarne: The delusion of Sedna's orbit is "more or less aligned relative to DFA axis" when you are ignorant about orbits!
  16. 30 September 2016 Bjarne: A lie about resolving two other features of the Pioneer anomaly - he cannot even predict the resolved Pioneer anomaly !
 
Reality Check said:
Over 6 years of ignorance of basic science shows that you will probably never be capable of understanding the contents of the PDF and those 2 graphs.
They are simply graphs of the remaining parts of data ("residuals") after fitting with 2 different models.
Click to expand...

I suppose the appropriate question to ask Bjarne is where is the graph of the residuals of the data from the fit with his model?
 
MRC_Hans said:
Well, OK. We'll wait for you to make your homework.

Hans
Click to expand...


I think you 7 times told me, - that if there was any science I did not understood, everybody was willing to help.
I guess you mean only the brainwashed part right ?

Not aspect where observation is conflicting with the brainwashed aspect of "science" I believe?
 
Dancing David said:
So how is Sedna's orbit aligned with Pioneer anomaly?
Click to expand...

The Pioneer space probes was not orbiting the Sun, but rather following the sun, - The radio signals emitted was therefore in principle perfect to measure / compare any orbit or rotation time dilation anomalies, on earth, - not expected based on the prevailing paradigm..

The Pioneer radio signals received on Earth is showing seasonal radio frequency variations, which could support that the earth moves more or less perpendicular to the Dark Flow axis, and even also support more about which direction it happens, - notice we talk about true motion..

Shortly spoken we can also expect unexpected time dilation influence, that to a certain (until now) unknown extend also will cause SR time dilation during some part of the orbit of the Earth, but not when moving opposite..

If so the orbit of the Earth is getting either faster elliptical or circular as expected, this part depend on where perihelion is pointing relative to that sideward SR / RR influence..
The pioneer data can even help to solve the last pieces of the outstanding problems fully to solve ice ages.

As you should be able to understand, this is a perfect starting point to discuss orbit inclination relative to DFA, - in general, - . But It require serious scientist, - not only brainwashed saved fools.
 
Bjarne said:
I think you 7 times told me, - that if there was any science I did not understood, everybody was willing to help.
I guess you mean only the brainwashed part right ?

Not aspect where observation is conflicting with the brainwashed aspect of "science" I believe?
Click to expand...

No, I think it must 20 times. And 20 times things were explained to you. And 20 times you called it crap or ignored it.

So, as far as I'm concerned, by now you're on your own.

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
No, I think it must 20 times. And 20 times things were explained to you. And 20 times you called it crap or ignored it.

So, as far as I'm concerned, by now you're on your own.

Hans
Click to expand...

It was not 20 times, but 21, - and it was only the mass -programmed brainwashed intolerant fanatic part of “science” you and others try to "teach" me ?

Unfortunately not real science based on observation of hard core evidence I ask for.
 
Bjarne said:
It was not 20 times, but 21, - and it was only the mass -programmed brainwashed intolerant fanatic part of “science” you and others try to "teach" me ?



Unfortunately not real science based on observation of hard core evidence I ask for.
Click to expand...


A teacher who perseveres with a student proud of his ignorance is wasting his time.

We've given up on educating you and helping you. You blindly and ignorantly dismiss anything that disagrees with you as brainwashing, propaganda or a similar term. This is not an insult, but a simple fact, proven again and again by your extensive posting history.

You've shown us you don't want to learn.

I'm here to be amused by your deliberate, prideful and intentional ignorance. You brag about your lack of education in the very sciences you claim to be overthrowing. That's funny **** man.


via Imgflip Meme Generator
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
I think you 7 times told me, - that if there was any science I did not understood, everybody was willing to help.
I guess you mean only the brainwashed part right ?

Not aspect where observation is conflicting with the brainwashed aspect of "science" I believe?
Click to expand...

Are you feeling OK? Your linguistic skills are deteriorating to the point were they're on par with your science claims.


via Imgflip Meme Generator

I can't even use a Cliff Calvin meme for you at the moment due to the incomprehensibility of what you're writing.
 
Bjarne said:
The Pioneer space probes was not orbiting the Sun, but rather following the sun, - The radio signals emitted was therefore in principle perfect to measure / compare any orbit or rotation time dilation anomalies, on earth, - not expected based on the prevailing paradigm..

The Pioneer radio signals received on Earth is showing seasonal radio frequency variations, which could support that the earth moves more or less perpendicular to the Dark Flow axis, and even also support more about which direction it happens, - notice we talk about true motion..

Shortly spoken we can also expect unexpected time dilation influence, that to a certain (until now) unknown extend also will cause SR time dilation during some part of the orbit of the Earth, but not when moving opposite..

If so the orbit of the Earth is getting either faster elliptical or circular as expected, this part depend on where perihelion is pointing relative to that sideward SR / RR influence..
The pioneer data can even help to solve the last pieces of the outstanding problems fully to solve ice ages.

As you should be able to understand, this is a perfect starting point to discuss orbit inclination relative to DFA, - in general, - . But It require serious scientist, - not only brainwashed saved fools.
Click to expand...

You should talk about yourself that way :D

And again, how does this relate to Sedna's orbit, which is not aligned with the Earth's or the Pioneer's?
 
Bjarne said:
It was not 20 times, but 21, - and it was only the mass -programmed brainwashed intolerant fanatic part of “science” you and others try to "teach" me ?

Unfortunately not real science based on observation of hard core evidence I ask for.
Click to expand...

Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.


Hans
 
Dancing David said:
You should talk about yourself that way :D

And again, how does this relate to Sedna's orbit, which is not aligned with the Earth's or the Pioneer's?
Click to expand...

Well, to call Bjarne's ignorance of theoretical science abysmal is to leave no suitable term for his ignorance of proper research.

Hans

*) Credits to Terry Pratchett
 
Last edited:
Dancing David said:
You should talk about yourself that way :D

And again, how does this relate to Sedna's orbit, which is not aligned with the Earth's or the Pioneer's?
Click to expand...

All objects will due to different RR impact (and due to DFA) sometimes be aligned with DFA-axis and sometimes perpendicular.
Change of the inclination relative to DFA-axis depend on true sideward motion relative to the DFA axis. And it depend how much faster compared to the Sun such object orbit moves towards a sideward RR direction..

If there are no sideward motion all object will be forced perpendicular relative to the DFA axis. - But this process is also a question of time, - and depend on how fast the object moves, - and the inclination it have, , - all seen from a overall dark flow motion perspective.

Notice I write true motion, - a galaxy can move sideward at lets say 100 km/s, - a solar system inside such galaxy can move oppesite the motion of the galaxy at the same speed.- Hence true speed for that object is zero.

The total RR impacting an object is at the same time also a total SR deformation factor, that means time will tick different depending on how true motion is. This is why the seasonal variation, found when analyzing the Pioneer signals, is really important to understand, - if we want to know more about what we is up against, - this off course not include those that have a (arrogant intolerant) concrete conviction, - that there is only one "God"..
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
All objects will due to different RR impact (and due to DFA) sometimes be aligned with DFA-axis and sometimes perpendicular.
Change of the inclination relative to DFA-axis depend on true sideward motion relative to the DFA axis. And it depend how much faster compared to the Sun such object orbit moves towards a sideward RR direction..

If there are no sideward motion all object will be forced perpendicular relative to the DFA axis. - But this process is also a question of time, - and depend on how fast the object moves, - and the inclination it have, , - all seen from a overall dark flow motion perspective.

Notice I write true motion, - a galaxy can move sideward at lets say 100 km/s, - a solar system inside such galaxy can move oppesite the motion of the galaxy at the same speed.- Hence true speed for that object is zero.

The total RR impacting an object is at the same time also a total SR deformation factor, that means time will tick different depending on how true motion is. This is why the seasonal variation, found when analyzing the Pioneer signals, is really important to understand, - if we want to know more about what we is up against, - this off course not include those that have a (arrogant intolerant) concrete conviction, - that there is only one "God"..
Click to expand...


via Imgflip Meme Generator
 
Bjarne said:
All objects will due to different RR impact (and due to DFA) sometimes be aligned with DFA-axis and sometimes perpendicular.
Change of the inclination relative to DFA-axis depend on true sideward motion relative to the DFA axis. And it depend how much faster compared to the Sun such object orbit moves towards a sideward RR direction..

If there are no sideward motion all object will be forced perpendicular relative to the DFA axis. - But this process is also a question of time, - and depend on how fast the object moves, - and the inclination it have, , - all seen from a overall dark flow motion perspective.

Notice I write true motion, - a galaxy can move sideward at lets say 100 km/s, - a solar system inside such galaxy can move oppesite the motion of the galaxy at the same speed.- Hence true speed for that object is zero.

The total RR impacting an object is at the same time also a total SR deformation factor, that means time will tick different depending on how true motion is. This is why the seasonal variation, found when analyzing the Pioneer signals, is really important to understand, - if we want to know more about what we is up against, - this off course not include those that have a (arrogant intolerant) concrete conviction, - that there is only one "God"..
Click to expand...

So are you just speculating that Sedna's orbit is related to the DF, you don't actually know it's orientation to the DF?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom