The supernatural

For the article Supernatural

  • thank you

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I hope my article is reviewed

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am waiting for your opinion, dear ones

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hoping for your success and health

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Status
Not open for further replies.
1- I do not understand what you mean by this?


2- No. No, I do not use it at all. Of course there is. You are right. But I do not use. And I do not accept. Rather, I receive scientific content through my own reviews on scientific sites and negotiations with relevant experts. These are new theories about science in the Qur'an. Of course, there is old scientific content on the sites you are talking about. But I rejected them. And I do not refer. Have you seen and seen the comprehensiveness of my article on the religious site of the article "Evolution from the Perspective of the Quran"? If so, tell us its address so we can check.


OK, so above you do admit that you are aware of those Ijaz websites and books. You have read them. And you do know what they say. You admit that.

You therefore know, and everyone here knows, that those Ijaz sources make all the same claims that you have repeatedly made to tell us that the Koran contains scientific descriptions of what a human foetus is like, how God made humans from mud, how it describes the Big bang, quantum theory, neutron stars, Noah and his Arc, human evolution, relativity theory etc. etc., ... those are all the exact same claims that you have made here 100 times or more aren't they? And before you give any other answer, the true answer is "Yes", you most definitely have been repeating all those same claims of "scientific miracles in the Koran".

You claim that you have obtained those same beliefs from some other scientific reviews on some other websites and from some other supposed "scientific experts" ... OK, so why did you not quote who those sources are? What are those sources that you used? Please name the websites, books and so-called "experts". You have the cheek here to demand that I “bring his address” for the Ijaz sources that I mentioned to you (there are many hundreds of them, and you know that very well, despite telling me that I must “bring his address"), and yet you yourself produce no such references or links for what you just claimed to be your other sources!


3- You told a good history. How interesting is my age too! Why not. I do not use. Of course, I've seen almost all of these sites you mention. And I read. I like reading. But I did not like any of them. And I refused. My Quranic theories are new. I have no claim. If you have such scientific material in the Qur'an, bring it.


There is no such scientific material in your Koran!, and everyone here has been telling you that for hundreds of posts now! So why are you asking me to bring you scientific material from your Koran?

4- No. My Quranic scientific theories are new. If you have the same content as me, bring it. With his address.

5- No. Give reasons and examples for your claim. You will not find my Quranic scientific content in any religious site. Bring it if you have. I have told this to you and other friends many times. I say it again. My Quranic scientific theories are new. Scorpion gave me good advice: "If these are new and the meaning and interpretation of the day of the Qur'an, be careful not to harm me. " Even in my country. he is right. "Being different is always and everywhere a crime."


I just explained above that your claims of finding science in the Koran are all exactly the same claims that were made decades ago by Islamic fundamentalists in the so-called Ijaz sources. See below ...

4- No. My Quranic scientific theories are new. If you have the same content as me, bring it. With his address.


OK here is a list of various sites and books that make all the same claims that you have been making -

1 first see this quite general article explaining how various claims that you have made, such as claims about the Big Bang, Quantum Theory, Relativity, Pulsars, Embryology, claims about Noah and his Arc, about human Evolution , Abiogenesis, etc. etc etc., and why such claims are simply part of a widespread bogus attempt within Islam to claim modern science in the 7th*century Koran -

https://www.newstatesman.com/uncategorized/2008/08/quran-muslim-scientific

2 next see the link below for a discussion of most (if not all) of the claims you have made about science in the Koran, and here with a long list of links to references and explanations for why all such Islamic claims of science are bogus -

https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/index.htm

3 OK, next here's a link to a YouTube film producing all the same bogus Islamic propaganda as you are claiming about things like the human embryo and the expanding universe etc. … as you must very well know, YouTube is awash with such Ijaz claims of “scientific miracles in the Koran” -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AmLbNeNf0

The link below is a long YouTube film praising Maurice Bucaille as the 1976 originator of all these Ijaz beliefs about science in the Koran … it also talks a lot about the Egyptian mummy that you also went on about for many pages -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNhL6Qal-KY

The next YouTube link is from an Islamic fundamentalist like yourself, claiming to refute what various other non-Muslims have shown as bogus claims of science in the Koran (it should be obvious that the Muslim guy in this film is completely unconvincing and a demented nutty religious fanatic … but look also below the video at the long list of comments from delusional Muslims nutcases praising the guy in the film as a brilliant revealer of Islamic truth) -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6gKNtKoAOM

Next YouTube link below is from an ex-Muslim explaining why 43 different claims of science in the Koran are clearly bogus fundamentalist religious nonsense -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677lMXleqWI

Below is a link to an Amazon page produced by simply typing a search term for “science in the Quran” (if you go to Islamic bookshops you can find hundreds of such books, videos and DVD's etc., proclaiming all the same untrue religious nonsense about “scientific miracles in the Quran”, ie all the exact same claims that you have been flooding this forum with for months -

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=scienc...ce+in+the+quran,stripbooks,106&ref=nb_sb_noss

If the above links, references, citations (ie “his address” in your language) are not clear enough for you, then below is a quote from Wikipedia on this subject of claimed miraculous science in the Koran, followed by a long list of links to references and articles making all the exact same claims that you have been making -


Here are a few Ijaz sources -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_view_of_miracles
Ijaz movement[edit]
Further information:*Quran and miracles §*Claimed scientific miracles
Starting the 1970s and 80s a "popular literature known as*ijaz" and often called "Scientific miracles in the Quran", argued that the Quran abounds with "scientific facts" centuries before their discovery by science and thus demonstrating that the Quran must be of divine origin.[27]*Among these miracles alleged by enthusiasts of the movement to be found in the Quran are "everything, from relativity, quantum mechanics, Big Bang theory, black holes and pulsars, genetics, embryology, modern geology, thermodynamics, even the laser and hydrogen fuel cells".[4]*"Widespread and well-funded"[28]*with "millions" from Saudi Arabia,[4]*the literature can be found in Muslim bookstores and on websites and television programs of Islamic preachers.[4]*According to author*Ziauddin Sardar, the movement has created a "global craze in Muslim societies".[4]

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Miracles_in_the_Quran
1.2Philosophical concerns with methodology
2Purported scientific miracles
2.1Quranic Miracle: Universe is steadily expanding
2.1.1Criticism
2.1.2Universe consists of "Space", while Quranic heaven is a solid canopy which could not expand
2.2The Big Bang
2.3A universe from smoke
2.4Black holes and pulsars
2.5The speed of light
2.6Seven heavens, seven earths
2.7The descent of Iron
2.8Chest-tightening in hypoxic environments
2.9Mountains stabilize the Earth
2.10Diminishing land
2.11Clay humans
2.12Semen production
2.13Embryology
2.14All things in pairs
2.15Lying forelocks
2.16Fresh water-salt water barriers


https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientif...MIvKXx46Os9QIV2O7tCh1pCA1IEAMYAyAAEgKfm_D_BwE
Contents
1Astronomy
1.1Geocentricism
1.2Setting and rising place of the sun
1.3Earth and heavens created in six days
1.4Earth created before stars
1.4.1Earth and heavens torn apart
1.4.2Heaven made from smoke
1.5Seven Earths
1.6Seven heavens
1.7Similar size and distance of the sun and moon
1.8Moon split in two
1.9Nature of the moon's light
1.10Meteors as stars fired at devils
1.11The sky/heaven as a ceiling
1.12The sky as a guarded ceiling
1.13The sky as something that can fall
1.14Heavens to be rolled up
1.15Stars as something that fall
1.16The cause of shadows changing length
1.17Disregard of North and South Poles
2Biology
2.1Evolution
2.1.1Humans created from clay
2.1.2Adam and Eve
2.2Embryology
2.2.1Sperm originating between the backbone and ribs
2.2.2Embryo forming from semen
2.2.3Disregard of female ovum
2.2.4Humans created from a clot of blood
2.2.5Gender decided at clot stage
2.2.6Bones formed before flesh
2.3All organisms created in pairs
2.4Fetus in three layers of darkness
2.5Functions of the heart
2.6Source and purity of Milk
3Geology and meteorology
3.1Flat Earth
3.1.1Facing toward Mecca
3.1.2Fasting and prayer requirements near the Poles
3.1.3Earth as spread out and flat
3.1.4Earth as like carpet
3.1.5Earth as like a couch
3.1.6Earth as like a bed
3.1.7Earth stretched out
3.1.8Earth as a level plain
3.2Permanent barrier between fresh and salt water
3.3Mountains prevent the earth from shaking
3.4Mountains cast upon Earth
3.5Chests contract with altitude
3.6Earthquakes as a punishment
3.7Disregard of evaporation in water cycle
3.8Mountains of hail in the sky
3.9Allah smites with thunderbolts
4Zoology
4.1Ants converse and recognize humans
4.2Four types of cattle
4.3Horses created as transportation
4.4All animals live in communities
4.5Bird flight as a miracle
5History
5.1Massive wall of iron
5.2Mary as part of the Trinity
5.3Mary as Miriam
5.4Ezra as the son of God in Jewish doctrine
5.5David invented coats of mail
5.6Crucifixions in ancient Egypt
5.7The singular Pharaoh
5.8Samaritans in ancient Egypt
5.9Noah's worldwide flood
5.10Flood waters boiled from an oven
5.11Noah's ark holding every species
6Sociology
6.1Linguistics
6.2Arabic as eminently accessible
7Miracles and myths
7.1Humans turned apes
7.2Mooing statue
7.3Hordes trapped by iron wall
7.4Supernatural food
7.5Stick turned serpent
7.6Army of genies and birds
7.7Living inside a big fish
7.8Buraq, the winged horse
7.9Speaking body parts
7.10Sea split in half
7.11Manipulating the wind
7.12Testimony of a dead man
7.13Mountains and birds sing psalms
8Other
8.1Nonmathematical hereditary laws
8.2Lying forelocks
9See Also
10References

https://islamhouse.com/en/category/221818/videos/showall/1/
Click the video links in that above reference.
 
To me the real "mess of horror" is this unbelievably, even inconceivably, muddied and muddled thinking process that is seemingly simply incapable of seeing what is in plain sight and understanding what has been so clearly explained so often. Dishonesty is fine, I mean it's not pretty and might sometimes be evil but deliberate dishonesty one can understand as an unavoidable occasional human trait. But this sheer incapacity to even understand the concept of intellectual integrity, or to even comprehend the most basic principles of a scientific worldview, that darkness of the mind, reduced to incessant sub-human and meaningless gibbering, that to me is the definition of hell. Hell is real enough, and right here. And not just here, unfortunately, although I don't recall having seen such a brazen and, well, distilled example before.

I wonder what the cure to such imbecility might be, generally speaking, or whether the afflicted must necessarily live with this mental fog until they die (by which time they'll have spread the contagion to the next generation). Because this isn't literally imbecility, after all, not actual stupidity, it's something way more different, and twisted, than that.

This thread's good for the lulz, sure, but it's also a deeply disturbing thread. Because this disease seemingly has no cure.

Hello dear professor. Haven't you been for a while ?! We miss you. I read your beautiful text in full. Your comment is a bit harsh for criticizing ideas, Master. Of course, I still do not know if you mean this message of our friend Abaddon or me. If you mean me, I must say; This is my opinion about God and the Qur'an. My opinion is different. Is it wrong to have different opinions with others ?! Don't we live in a free global village? I think we should allow everyone to express their ideas completely freely. Is not that right, Master?
 
Why are you refusing to answer my question and just being creepy in response to my posts Heydarian? It's a yes or no question.

Hi dear friend. which question?! I do not see a question! I advise you to get rid of fear. Nothing in the world is scary and everything is beautiful. The only thing that can be scary is inside us. The only way to not be afraid of ourselves is to control and monitor it. Be mindful of ourselves. Everything is beautiful. If I think like you, because I am a Muslim and I speak only among hundreds of infidels and I fully express my beliefs, I should be afraid of you. But I have no fear.
And I see you as a friend. Really friend. We only have a slight difference of opinion. We can get along if we want to. Is not that so? Let's put aside a little bit of bias. I do not see the point of collision between you and me. We walk in parallel. And this is a beautiful thought. Is not that so?
Never be afraid. Be brave. Stand like a mountain.
These were not sermons or advices. Just a friendly chat. My arms are open to everyone.
;)
 
Message 2406 seems to be a layman's attempt to summarise some of the available scientific evidence and speculation about abiogenesis. It's a simplistic summary, but reasonably accurate. It doesn't tell me anything I didn't already know, and it certainly does not support your claim that there is some magic "command" that had to be issued in order for life to begin.


I'm pretty sure that my understanding of the science is considerably greater than yours.

The comment by Eugene Koonin is about a part of the abiogenesis process that isn't (yet) completely understood. That gap in our understanding is nowhere near big enough for you to insert your God. Precedent strongly suggests that it is science that will fill it, not ignorant superstition.

Hello dear pixel42. Your opinion is completely respected. You mentioned good points. Thank you.
- But .... science has not yet given an answer to how inanimate matter came to life. God claims in the Qur'an that My command has revived inanimate matter. (Approximately 3 billion years ago in low-potency hot pottery Low water) We do not yet have a second claim for this claim.Finally, or should we wait to see if science can answer this question? Or accept God's claim. I personally accept and love God's claim. I have seen things that you and no one else has seen.
- I assure you that you are absolutely right about this. Because I see you only scientifically capable. And your scientific understanding is higher than mine. I'm proud of you too.
- I advise you to be patient in judging only on the basis of science. And do not rush. Should we wait to see if science will fill this gap? Of course, rest assured, I fully accept science and the advancement of science. And I'm proud of that. But I am not in a hurry to find and see the answer to these two important questions in the universe. (The Revive of inanimate matter - the creation of the single from nothing - is both claimed by God to be my work. And I accept God's claim. But I am waiting for scientific proof. Will science be able to answer these two questions? There is no answer yet )
And I will not judge soon. At the same time, I firmly stand on the answer to these two questions. Unless science proves otherwise to me. I have no prejudice.
Good luck
 
Last edited:
Should we wait to see if science can answer this question? Or accept God's claim the claim of some guy who wrote a book centuries ago.
In the words of Sir David Attenborough: "The correct scientific response to anything that is not understood is always to look harder for the explanation, not give up and assume a supernatural cause".

Our ancestors didn't understand why the rains sometimes failed so they assumed a supernatural cause and did rain dances to please the the rain God. Were they right?

Our ancestors didn't understand why the nearby mountain rumbled so they assumed a supernatural cause and sacrificed goats to the volcano God. Were they right?

History is one example after another of people assuming supernatural causes for anything they didn't understand, and eventually being proved wrong. The chances of this being the first time in history where those who opt to accept the supernatural explanation are finally proved right is so small as to be negligible. The smart money is always on science.
 
Hello dear professor. Haven't you been for a while ?! We miss you. I read your beautiful text in full. Your comment is a bit harsh for criticizing ideas, Master. Of course, I still do not know if you mean this message of our friend Abaddon or me. If you mean me, I must say; This is my opinion about God and the Qur'an. My opinion is different. Is it wrong to have different opinions with others ?! Don't we live in a free global village? I think we should allow everyone to express their ideas completely freely. Is not that right, Master?

I am not and will never be "your friend". Do not ever again make any such claim.
 
OK, so above you do admit that you are aware of those Ijaz websites and books. You have read them. And you do know what they say. You admit that.

You therefore know, and everyone here knows, that those Ijaz sources make all the same claims that you have repeatedly made to tell us that the Koran contains scientific descriptions of what a human foetus is like, how God made humans from mud, how it describes the Big bang, quantum theory, neutron stars, Noah and his Arc, human evolution, relativity theory etc. etc., ... those are all the exact same claims that you have made here 100 times or more aren't they? And before you give any other answer, the true answer is "Yes", you most definitely have been repeating all those same claims of "scientific miracles in the Koran".

You claim that you have obtained those same beliefs from some other scientific reviews on some other websites and from some other supposed "scientific experts" ... OK, so why did you not quote who those sources are? What are those sources that you used? Please name the websites, books and so-called "experts". You have the cheek here to demand that I “bring his address” for the Ijaz sources that I mentioned to you (there are many hundreds of them, and you know that very well, despite telling me that I must “bring his address"), and yet you yourself produce no such references or links for what you just claimed to be your other sources!





There is no such scientific material in your Koran!, and everyone here has been telling you that for hundreds of posts now! So why are you asking me to bring you scientific material from your Koran?






I just explained above that your claims of finding science in the Koran are all exactly the same claims that were made decades ago by Islamic fundamentalists in the so-called Ijaz sources. See below ...




OK here is a list of various sites and books that make all the same claims that you have been making -

1 first see this quite general article explaining how various claims that you have made, such as claims about the Big Bang, Quantum Theory, Relativity, Pulsars, Embryology, claims about Noah and his Arc, about human Evolution , Abiogenesis, etc. etc etc., and why such claims are simply part of a widespread bogus attempt within Islam to claim modern science in the 7th*century Koran -

https://www.newstatesman.com/uncategorized/2008/08/quran-muslim-scientific

2 next see the link below for a discussion of most (if not all) of the claims you have made about science in the Koran, and here with a long list of links to references and explanations for why all such Islamic claims of science are bogus -

https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/index.htm

3 OK, next here's a link to a YouTube film producing all the same bogus Islamic propaganda as you are claiming about things like the human embryo and the expanding universe etc. … as you must very well know, YouTube is awash with such Ijaz claims of “scientific miracles in the Koran” -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69AmLbNeNf0

The link below is a long YouTube film praising Maurice Bucaille as the 1976 originator of all these Ijaz beliefs about science in the Koran … it also talks a lot about the Egyptian mummy that you also went on about for many pages -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNhL6Qal-KY

The next YouTube link is from an Islamic fundamentalist like yourself, claiming to refute what various other non-Muslims have shown as bogus claims of science in the Koran (it should be obvious that the Muslim guy in this film is completely unconvincing and a demented nutty religious fanatic … but look also below the video at the long list of comments from delusional Muslims nutcases praising the guy in the film as a brilliant revealer of Islamic truth) -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6gKNtKoAOM

Next YouTube link below is from an ex-Muslim explaining why 43 different claims of science in the Koran are clearly bogus fundamentalist religious nonsense -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677lMXleqWI

Below is a link to an Amazon page produced by simply typing a search term for “science in the Quran” (if you go to Islamic bookshops you can find hundreds of such books, videos and DVD's etc., proclaiming all the same untrue religious nonsense about “scientific miracles in the Quran”, ie all the exact same claims that you have been flooding this forum with for months -

https://www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=scienc...ce+in+the+quran,stripbooks,106&ref=nb_sb_noss

If the above links, references, citations (ie “his address” in your language) are not clear enough for you, then below is a quote from Wikipedia on this subject of claimed miraculous science in the Koran, followed by a long list of links to references and articles making all the exact same claims that you have been making -


Here are a few Ijaz sources -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_view_of_miracles
Ijaz movement[edit]
Further information:*Quran and miracles §*Claimed scientific miracles
Starting the 1970s and 80s a "popular literature known as*ijaz" and often called "Scientific miracles in the Quran", argued that the Quran abounds with "scientific facts" centuries before their discovery by science and thus demonstrating that the Quran must be of divine origin.[27]*Among these miracles alleged by enthusiasts of the movement to be found in the Quran are "everything, from relativity, quantum mechanics, Big Bang theory, black holes and pulsars, genetics, embryology, modern geology, thermodynamics, even the laser and hydrogen fuel cells".[4]*"Widespread and well-funded"[28]*with "millions" from Saudi Arabia,[4]*the literature can be found in Muslim bookstores and on websites and television programs of Islamic preachers.[4]*According to author*Ziauddin Sardar, the movement has created a "global craze in Muslim societies".[4]

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Miracles_in_the_Quran
1.2Philosophical concerns with methodology
2Purported scientific miracles
2.1Quranic Miracle: Universe is steadily expanding
2.1.1Criticism
2.1.2Universe consists of "Space", while Quranic heaven is a solid canopy which could not expand
2.2The Big Bang
2.3A universe from smoke
2.4Black holes and pulsars
2.5The speed of light
2.6Seven heavens, seven earths
2.7The descent of Iron
2.8Chest-tightening in hypoxic environments
2.9Mountains stabilize the Earth
2.10Diminishing land
2.11Clay humans
2.12Semen production
2.13Embryology
2.14All things in pairs
2.15Lying forelocks
2.16Fresh water-salt water barriers


https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientif...MIvKXx46Os9QIV2O7tCh1pCA1IEAMYAyAAEgKfm_D_BwE
Contents
1Astronomy
1.1Geocentricism
1.2Setting and rising place of the sun
1.3Earth and heavens created in six days
1.4Earth created before stars
1.4.1Earth and heavens torn apart
1.4.2Heaven made from smoke
1.5Seven Earths
1.6Seven heavens
1.7Similar size and distance of the sun and moon
1.8Moon split in two
1.9Nature of the moon's light
1.10Meteors as stars fired at devils
1.11The sky/heaven as a ceiling
1.12The sky as a guarded ceiling
1.13The sky as something that can fall
1.14Heavens to be rolled up
1.15Stars as something that fall
1.16The cause of shadows changing length
1.17Disregard of North and South Poles
2Biology
2.1Evolution
2.1.1Humans created from clay
2.1.2Adam and Eve
2.2Embryology
2.2.1Sperm originating between the backbone and ribs
2.2.2Embryo forming from semen
2.2.3Disregard of female ovum
2.2.4Humans created from a clot of blood
2.2.5Gender decided at clot stage
2.2.6Bones formed before flesh
2.3All organisms created in pairs
2.4Fetus in three layers of darkness
2.5Functions of the heart
2.6Source and purity of Milk
3Geology and meteorology
3.1Flat Earth
3.1.1Facing toward Mecca
3.1.2Fasting and prayer requirements near the Poles
3.1.3Earth as spread out and flat
3.1.4Earth as like carpet
3.1.5Earth as like a couch
3.1.6Earth as like a bed
3.1.7Earth stretched out
3.1.8Earth as a level plain
3.2Permanent barrier between fresh and salt water
3.3Mountains prevent the earth from shaking
3.4Mountains cast upon Earth
3.5Chests contract with altitude
3.6Earthquakes as a punishment
3.7Disregard of evaporation in water cycle
3.8Mountains of hail in the sky
3.9Allah smites with thunderbolts
4Zoology
4.1Ants converse and recognize humans
4.2Four types of cattle
4.3Horses created as transportation
4.4All animals live in communities
4.5Bird flight as a miracle
5History
5.1Massive wall of iron
5.2Mary as part of the Trinity
5.3Mary as Miriam
5.4Ezra as the son of God in Jewish doctrine
5.5David invented coats of mail
5.6Crucifixions in ancient Egypt
5.7The singular Pharaoh
5.8Samaritans in ancient Egypt
5.9Noah's worldwide flood
5.10Flood waters boiled from an oven
5.11Noah's ark holding every species
6Sociology
6.1Linguistics
6.2Arabic as eminently accessible
7Miracles and myths
7.1Humans turned apes
7.2Mooing statue
7.3Hordes trapped by iron wall
7.4Supernatural food
7.5Stick turned serpent
7.6Army of genies and birds
7.7Living inside a big fish
7.8Buraq, the winged horse
7.9Speaking body parts
7.10Sea split in half
7.11Manipulating the wind
7.12Testimony of a dead man
7.13Mountains and birds sing psalms
8Other
8.1Nonmathematical hereditary laws
8.2Lying forelocks
9See Also
10References

https://islamhouse.com/en/category/221818/videos/showall/1/
Click the video links in that above reference.

- Hi Professor. Thank you very much for your efforts in providing these Islamic Quranic sites. I have seen almost all of this. But it is old and it has been said according to the old perception. And in some places it is like superstition. And has not been thoroughly investigated. That's why I do not choose these sites.
- I said in a message after the article "Proof of the supernatural based on the Qur'an": I am correcting many of my views on scientific content in the Qur'an. The most important thing is that there is no supernatural in the Qur'an. In the Qur'an, he only talks about matter and the material world. We have only one more universe. What is said in the Qur'an about the Day of Judgment and the Hereafter and other things beyond is all in this world.
- Fixed and ground axis are obsolete. And it is not in the Quran. All the scientific contents of the Qur'an should be examined on the basis of modern science. For example, Doomsday, the Hereafter, Hell, and Heaven can all be examined in terms of quantum physics. And it is in the Quran. All the sites you mentioned are based on theoretical physics and are not responsive.
- I mentioned the address of one of the scientific sites I used on "Evolution from the Perspective of the Qur'an" in message 2406.
- Do you have enough fluency in Arabic and Quran? To see the scientific content in the Qur'an, you must be familiar with the Arabic and Qur'anic languages, as well as the translation and interpretation of the Qur'an. If you have, then you can see science well in the Qur'an.
- Up-to-date scientific content in the Qur'an is not a claim. There really is. But unfortunately, these sites that you provided have not been studied according to modern science and accuracy. That's why I did not choose. Updated scientific sites and all in Latin. And then it is examined and interpreted with Quranic words in the relevant verse and surah. Rest assured that everything I say is according to the knowledge of the day and the study in the Qur'an. And the Qur'an confirms it. This is a new kind of interpretation according to modern science. You have not seen it anywhere and therefore you do not know and it is strange to you. You are right. Because it's weird. The Quran is a book of wonders. Be sure.
Thank you very much for your efforts.
 
In the words of Sir David Attenborough: "The correct scientific response to anything that is not understood is always to look harder for the explanation, not give up and assume a supernatural cause".

Our ancestors didn't understand why the rains sometimes failed so they assumed a supernatural cause and did rain dances to please the the rain God. Were they right?

Our ancestors didn't understand why the nearby mountain rumbled so they assumed a supernatural cause and sacrificed goats to the volcano God. Were they right?

History is one example after another of people assuming supernatural causes for anything they didn't understand, and eventually being proved wrong. The chances of this being the first time in history where those who opt to accept the supernatural explanation are finally proved right is so small as to be negligible. The smart money is always on science.

- Exactly. We must not give up. We must continue our scientific research to get the correct and complete answer.
- No. It is a superstition. I do not accept at all.
- No. It is a superstition. I do not accept at all.
- There is no supernatural. Whatever is in the material world. God is also in the material world. I do not seek God in the skys. This is a superstition. God is here. And closer to us than the jugular vein !!!
 
- Exactly. We must not give up. We must continue our scientific research to get the correct and complete answer.
- No. It is a superstition. I do not accept at all.
- No. It is a superstition. I do not accept at all.
- There is no supernatural. Whatever is in the material world. God is also in the material world. I do not seek God in the skys. This is a superstition. God is here. And closer to us than the jugular vein !!!
Your god is a superstion no different from the rest.
 
- Hi Professor. Thank you very much for your efforts in providing these Islamic Quranic sites. I have seen almost all of this. But it is old and it has been said according to the old perception. And in some places it is like superstition. And has not been thoroughly investigated. That's why I do not choose these sites.
- I said in a message after the article "Proof of the supernatural based on the Qur'an": I am correcting many of my views on scientific content in the Qur'an. The most important thing is that there is no supernatural in the Qur'an. In the Qur'an, he only talks about matter and the material world. We have only one more universe. What is said in the Qur'an about the Day of Judgment and the Hereafter and other things beyond is all in this world.
- Fixed and ground axis are obsolete. And it is not in the Quran. All the scientific contents of the Qur'an should be examined on the basis of modern science. For example, Doomsday, the Hereafter, Hell, and Heaven can all be examined in terms of quantum physics. And it is in the Quran. All the sites you mentioned are based on theoretical physics and are not responsive.
- I mentioned the address of one of the scientific sites I used on "Evolution from the Perspective of the Qur'an" in message 2406.
- Do you have enough fluency in Arabic and Quran? To see the scientific content in the Qur'an, you must be familiar with the Arabic and Qur'anic languages, as well as the translation and interpretation of the Qur'an. If you have, then you can see science well in the Qur'an.
- Up-to-date scientific content in the Qur'an is not a claim. There really is. But unfortunately, these sites that you provided have not been studied according to modern science and accuracy. That's why I did not choose. Updated scientific sites and all in Latin. And then it is examined and interpreted with Quranic words in the relevant verse and surah. Rest assured that everything I say is according to the knowledge of the day and the study in the Qur'an. And the Qur'an confirms it. This is a new kind of interpretation according to modern science. You have not seen it anywhere and therefore you do not know and it is strange to you. You are right. Because it's weird. The Quran is a book of wonders. Be sure.
Thank you very much for your efforts.


No, absolutely not! Those references that I just listed for you, make all the same claims that you have made, about all the same things you have claimed as science in the Koran. You are just copying them.

There is no science in the Koran. And you have not shown any science in the Koran.

All you have done is claimed that ordinary sentences with ordinary words in the Koran, actually mean all sorts of modern science ... but you have no justification, no evidence, & no scientific education for any of your claims at all except your fanatical religious belief.

Can you produce any genuine scientific research paper from any genuine science journal, where the paper claims that the 7th century Koran describes any of the science that you have claimed (e.g. black holes, pulsars, evolution, relativity theory, quantum theory, 900 year old Noah, Arc at the top of a mountain etc. etc.)?

Why are none of your claims ever reported in any real genuine science research papers claiming to show that the Koran described the science 1400 years ago? It's not there, none of it! None of your claims are supported anywhere in any of the very science papers that have studied all these things.

The reason it's not there is because it's not true. None of your claims about science in the Koran are true. They are just the same old ravings of Islamic religious fanatics who desperately want to show a reason to believe in their invisible God.
 
- No. It is a superstition. I do not accept at all.
- There is no supernatural. Whatever is in the material world. God is also in the material world.
God is a supernatural explanation of natural phenomena, whether that natural phenomenon be rain, volcanos or the Big Bang. If you reject superstition and the supernatural then you reject any and all gods.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/supernatural

Definition of supernatural

1: of or relating to an order of existence beyond the visible observable universe
especially : of or relating to God or a god, demigod, spirit, or devil

When we have a natural explanation of a phenomenon we have no need to imagine the existence of a god to explain it.
 
So Heydarian, what changed your mind?

Hello. thanks for your kindness. I did more research. And I went to more scientific ways to find the supernatural. And then I came to the conclusion that the supernatural is not within our comprehension. And let's take time on this. On the other hand, I saw in the Qur'an that it speaks only of the material world. And it has nothing to do with supernatural. It even defines God in the material world. It does not dream and fantasize. He says in this world if you can find God. Of course, God is not visible and can not be found! But signs of the Creator are everywhere. This is enough for man, who is of matter and energy. There is no further expectation. Everyone should look for the unknown as much as they understand. no more. Some people unfortunately write stories to understand unknown issues. This is not a good approach.
So I put the supernatural aside. I have no prejudice to accept unrealistic issues. Free Free I think. And my best choice, which I am proud of, is "science". I accept my religion with knowledge. "science" proves God to me. Unfortunately, our religious teachings are flawed. And the preachers of religion must try to solve these shortcomings with science. But they work little.
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom