• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Second Roberts-Fetzer Debate

Pagan,

I think Ron and Mark would debate anybody, if those people just had the courage to debate Ron and Mark. Many have declined.

Latest to flee, Kevin Ryan.
 
HyJinX said:
Do you think that Fetzer got the beter of Mark in the first installment?
Click to expand...

Sorry HyJinX, was that question to me?
If so : Yes, i thought Fetzer got the better of Mark in the first debate. Let me statethis is purely because Fetzer got about 80% of the time to speak unchallenged to Marks 20%.

The 2nd and 3rd debate showed a change in setup - with the time spread more evenly. In this setting - Mark clearly outclassed him.

But to answer your question : In the first debate, Fetzer had the advantage in my opinion.
 
pagan said:
I wonder why you guys almost always debate Fetzer on MSM?
Click to expand...
Who else has debated Fetzer?

Fetzer is most certainly not a good representant for the truth movement. In fact, many believe him to be a disinfo agent.
Click to expand...
Yeah, yeah... What well-recognized truther isn't a disinfo agent?

Unfortunately, he is not a bad debater. Not having seen the debate I guess that he whipped Gravy butt.
Click to expand...
Is this how you've formed your beliefs on 9/11, too; by not looking at any of the relevent evidence?

Besides, you've just demonstrated classic truther mentality. You have a pre-conceived notion about how things worked.
 
Last edited:
That video is hilarious, Fetzer clearly has some issues.

And anyone who can seriously claim Fetzer is winning these debate CLEARLY has MAJOR issues.
 
A controlled demolition of Fetzer there.
I will happily contribute again to any forthcoming debates with prominent fantasists.
Apart from the entertainment value, I think it is important that this video debate format is used, as many of the bottom feeders in the truth movement seem to find written debate somewhat challenging.
Nice work Ron and Mark.
Who is next in line?
 
scissorhands said:
A controlled demolition of Fetzer there.
I will happily contribute again to any forthcoming debates with prominent fantasists.
Apart from the entertainment value, I think it is important that this video debate format is used, as many of the bottom feeders in the truth movement seem to find written debate somewhat challenging.
Nice work Ron and Mark.
Who is next in line?
Click to expand...

Was supposed to be Kevin Ryan but he chickened out.

I'd say Barrett next :p But he'd probably do the same...

How about Steven Jones?
 
OK, I will take a look at it then...

But, remember we truthers consider Uncle Fetz to be much more dangerous than Gravy.
 
pagan said:
OK, I will take a look at it then...

But, remember we truthers consider Uncle Fetz to be much more dangerous than Gravy.
Click to expand...

The first debate is made up of Fetzer's beam claims. The second two debates (in which Mark FLATTENS him), Fetzer is debating using conventional truther claims.

Conspiracists can't simply brush this one off saying "Fetzer's theories are insane", due to the fact he makes a lot of the same claims that they do.
 
Hyperviolet said:
Side note: Anyone else catch Fetzers' body language... closed arms, leaning back in the chair etc. He seems somewhat uncomfortable or defensive???
Click to expand...


The way he was rocking front to back, I thought he was a kid about to pee his pants.

Nice work Gravy. I haven't gotten a chance to see part 3 yet, but I imagine it is more of the same. I was totally disgusted by Fetzer's veiled accusation that all military people blindly follow orders. Truthers seem to forget the part about lawful orders, and it is repulsive that a vet would even suggest they are complicit.
 
My verdict after seeing the second part.

I'm glad to declare that none won. The host was terrible. So, the first part is about space beams? Sorry, have to skip that, too much for my stomach.
 
That was a knockout. Good job Mark and Ron. Fetzer repeated all the debunked Pentagon stuff. His account held no water. 100-0 for you guys.
 
pagan said:
My verdict after seeing the second part.

I'm glad to declare that none won. The host was terrible. So, the first part is about space beams? Sorry, have to skip that, too much for my stomach.
Click to expand...
I really would like to see your reasoning.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom