Molinaro
Illuminator
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Messages
- 4,781
Roger's turn!
It would seem that the evidence against Clemens is more concrete than what the prosecution had against Bonds. I expect a different outcome in this trial.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/6765143/roger-clemens-trial-prosecution-makes-opening-statement
The main piece of physical evidence against him is cotton swabs and needles that test positive for Roger's DNA and steroids. They were saved by Brian McNamee who says he used them when injecting Roger with steroids in 2001. He said he saved them in case the steroid issue ever came to light and Roger decided to 'throw him under the bus'.
The defense counters that it was manufactured. That Brian did inject him with B-12 and cordisone. And that he added the steroids to it after the fact. They suggest that Brian did this in case he needed to blackmail the team into letting him keep his job, since he was at the time under a criminal investigation for rape. He was never charged.
The judge pointed out during pre-trial arguments that wouldn't it make a lot more sense to blackmail the 3 players on the team who openly admit having Brian inject him with steroids instead of having to make up evidence against someone that he did not inject?
I'm with the judge on that point.
It would seem that the evidence against Clemens is more concrete than what the prosecution had against Bonds. I expect a different outcome in this trial.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/6765143/roger-clemens-trial-prosecution-makes-opening-statement
The main piece of physical evidence against him is cotton swabs and needles that test positive for Roger's DNA and steroids. They were saved by Brian McNamee who says he used them when injecting Roger with steroids in 2001. He said he saved them in case the steroid issue ever came to light and Roger decided to 'throw him under the bus'.
The defense counters that it was manufactured. That Brian did inject him with B-12 and cordisone. And that he added the steroids to it after the fact. They suggest that Brian did this in case he needed to blackmail the team into letting him keep his job, since he was at the time under a criminal investigation for rape. He was never charged.
The judge pointed out during pre-trial arguments that wouldn't it make a lot more sense to blackmail the 3 players on the team who openly admit having Brian inject him with steroids instead of having to make up evidence against someone that he did not inject?
I'm with the judge on that point.