Hokulele
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
The hell?
Zombie thread!!
*Flees*
Zombie thread!!
*Flees*
The RMackey "Cross-Bracing" Lie
- Thread starter TruthSeeker1234
- Start date
ElMondoHummus
0.25 short of being half-witted
Not even if you were in a courtroom if a lawyer asked you "Is it called the Willis Tower, yes or no?"
I don't know about Alferd, but I would grit my teeth, grind out a "Not by me!", and suck up whatever contempt-of-court charges I'd get for doing that.
Sears Tower, dammit! Sears Tower! I don't care who bought it recently!
I live in Chicago, and there was some momentum for calling it "The Big Willie" but it didn't last long. People here still call the Macy's on State St. "Marshall Fields" and US Cellular Field "Sox Park" or "Comiskey" so it should take a few decades to catch on. Like right around when their lease is up.
9/11 Chewy Defense
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2007
- Messages
- 3,593
I don't see anything suspicious about those crane supports. The first post on this thread is a strawman arguement!
Sorry to post, but, like always, there's a communication problem here.
You're not understanding the context of conspiracy theories in this subforum. Essentially none of them are new, so you're seeing these theories be pitched at people who've been hearing them for several years now, and were probably debunked immediately. You aren't seeing "groupthink" (what a convenient word to label people who don't agree with you), you are seeing a deep skepticism. The antidote for this would be actual evidence, which conspiracy theorists, the 9/11 variety in particular, are always very short on. The confrontations you see generally surround the lack of evidence. Because there's a lot of "I'm just asking questions," a lot of throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks.
It seems to me like you're looking for excuses to dismiss people's opinions, instead of addressing what they're actually saying.
What makes you think anything in that last paragraph applies to anyone here? Why are you assuming that people who disagree with you are ignorant? It is a very self-serving assumption, and will not help you become more informed about anything, ever. 9/11 or otherwise.
Understand that you're still here peddling conspiracy theories as an option. It would be like saying that you didn't know if the holocaust happened or if you were on the fence. "I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but..."
You're not understanding the context of conspiracy theories in this subforum. Essentially none of them are new, so you're seeing these theories be pitched at people who've been hearing them for several years now, and were probably debunked immediately. You aren't seeing "groupthink" (what a convenient word to label people who don't agree with you), you are seeing a deep skepticism. The antidote for this would be actual evidence, which conspiracy theorists, the 9/11 variety in particular, are always very short on. The confrontations you see generally surround the lack of evidence. Because there's a lot of "I'm just asking questions," a lot of throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks.
This is a weird statement. Not all math teachers or professional wrestlers are equal either, what is your point?
It seems to me like you're looking for excuses to dismiss people's opinions, instead of addressing what they're actually saying.
Aside from the logical inconsistency regarding your last sentence that's already been pointed out, it seems here again that you're looking for reasons to dismiss peoples' opinions outright. You are making several assumptions which have no basis, particularly as it pertains to this forum, moreso this subforum.
What makes you think anything in that last paragraph applies to anyone here? Why are you assuming that people who disagree with you are ignorant? It is a very self-serving assumption, and will not help you become more informed about anything, ever. 9/11 or otherwise.
Last edited: