The Republican War on Science

[Suddenly]

A friendly tip - I'd either edit that jpg or remove it before your post edit time limit expires. LP is right - there is a four-letter word in the "legal disclaimer" at the bottom. I won't report it, but someone might.

I may report it. I strongly think that the end of dirty language will make this forum a better place, unlike that cesspool over at skepticalcommunity.com where people use profanity. Those people are losers. Especially Doctor X. He is mean.


It is coming up as a red X for me most of the time, but the knowlege that this forum is corrupted by profanity makes me unhappy. I'd better alert the moderation so that this can be a happy place again.

 

[CapelDodger]

Technology that is possible because of science behind it, duhhhh.

What doesn't have military applications under that logic?

[/B]There was logic in there? I thought I was just indulging in whimsy. The obvious military application in this case is fog-free lenses, at say $76k for a pair of goggles, but it doesn't match up in significance to mass-production of iron. Misted-up windows aren't keeping people awake at night praying for a solution, nor dedicated scientists pulling double-shifts to eliminate that scourge of society. So why? Nobody's going to be better fed, sheltered or laid because of this technology.

It's the car thing, isn't it?

Indeed.

Well, yes, indeed. The taxpayer funds the car-culture, but the taxpayer is not necessarily of the car-culture.

 

[Suddenly]

I'm sorry if that retard joke cut a bit too close to the bone! I didn't intend to offend you!

Mainly I'm offended by the lack of originality and/or wit. Sadly it seems typical of this forum these days.

That you believe it is clever is of greater impact than any insult I can respond with. Will you next post a picture of Boy George with the caption "This thread is gay?"

I wait with baited breath...


As not to derail:

Al Gore invented the internet!! Liberals must love science!!!!