The PROPHET YAHWEH, Maker of UFO's

On HOLD

Dear Prophet Yahweh,

But it WILL be open to the public. We cannot have a public park closed. The park is open. The public is welcome. We will not enact any form of segregation for the purpose of this demonstration. Surely you can understand that we have no ability to close a public park.

We are willing to withdraw the decision we made this morning if you are able to state for the record that you understand that the park is a public place, and if you can assure us that no firearms will be present. If you can provide us with that assurance, we can reverse our decision and proceed toward testing.

I don't believe that we over-reacted, Propeht Yahweh. I believe that we reacted appropriately, given the circumstances. Any further talk of firearms will inspire the same reaction. If we find any reason to believe or even suspect that firearms are present at the test site, we will cancel the test immediately.

Have we now succeeded in clearing up our misunderstanding, sir? I do hope so. I was looking forward to the test, as were the JREF TAM4 conference attendees. The park will be filled with people waiting for you to summon.

I hope that we can now proceed with a better understanding of what the actual test (and the conditions surrounding it) will be.

-Kramer, JREF
 
IN THE BLESSED AND HOLY NAME OF YAHWEH

Dear Kramer,

I am not saddened or surprised that you all would flee at the first sign of something you did not like.

It reminds me of when you first replied back to me about how that you could have Randi and your testers present in Las Vegas within a couple of weeks or however you put it to me, only to find out that you all would not show up until 6 months later.

Other people wrote you about how that you initially said you would test me in a couple of weeks and that they felt it was strange that once I had agreed to the challenge, you all changed the event to about six months later.

And, for you all to take me being willing to have armed security present at the event, if it the exact location is made public, because of all the people who would show up, and cancelling the event, does not surprise me one bit.

You knew that my being willing to have armed security there was only based on it being a public event where possibly thousands of people could show up.

You knew that all you had to do was tell me that it would not be a public event and as a result, armed security would have been a moot issue.

You knew that all you had to do was tell me that it would not be public and that armed security would not be neccessary and I would say great!

But, you all seized upon that opportunity to cancel the event.

People had been emailing me saying that the event would not happen!

They said that when time came for it to happen, you all would figure out some reason for it not to happend just like when it was suppose to happen the last time.

You all put it off over six months after telling me it could happen in a couple of weeks.

No problem Kramer.

You and Randi have proven all them right - twice!

But, I never believed it would happen after you got my hopes up and then postponing my hopes for six months.

I never believed in you and Kramer after that.

I hoped I was wrong and that the event would go on, but I was right.

Thanks for leading me on for almost a year by dangling your carrot before me only to pull it out of reach twice.

Sincerely,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller
 
We, Also, are NOT SADDENED

Dear Prophet Yahweh,

"Flee", sir?

If we "fled", it was at the first talk of "armed security", and rightly so. Any reasonable person would have been alarmed, given the circumstances.

It is YOU who are effecting a grand escape here, by attaching the first of what we expect to have been a long series of unreasonable demands that would all culminate in a single result; the rejection of your claim and the cancellation of the JREF Challenge preliminary test.

This is the standard technique of all those who make claims that they know they are unable to provide evidence for. It's business as usual for us. We have no more time to waste on questions about firearms, or the closing of a public park, or whatever you had prepared for us next.

And we are not saddened or surprised at all that you would behave as you have in this email. All applicants do so when things begin to turn sour for them. You are no different.

You are deluded, sir, as evidenced by your utter misrepresentation of the actual facts of our correspondence, which I will not endeavor to clarify for you, as we know that you will continue to see it your way, and publicize it as such. We will waste no more time on this matter.

Thank you for your interest in the JREF Paranormal Challenge. Your file has been closed. This is our final communication with you.

We sincerely wish you the very best.

-Kramer, JREF
 
IN THE BLESSED AND HOLY NAME OF YAHWEH

Dear Kramer,

The fact is that your insinuation of me being "unreasonable" at having armed guards at a media promoted public event, that could possibly have hundreds or thousands of people, is not "deluded" at all.

In fact, it is common to see armed security at public events with so many people being free to attend.

I am a very reasonable person, and I have experience in promoting public events in the past, and I am not talking about at my summonings.

Consider some of the things you said in your communications to me:

Any reasonable person would have been alarmed, given the circumstances.

Any reasonable person would have known that it is wisdom to at least consider the possibility of having armed security at a public event that they were hosting with the media's help!

To be alarmed at the idea of armed security at a media promoted public event and not consider this happens often at public events is to not understand the reality of the event being considered.

It is "deluded" to not consider the armed security guard option.

Any reasonable person would have considered liability issues if anything unexpected happened.

If any thing happened, both your organization and myself would be liable.

And, we both could be sued, and lose in court, because, in the judge's eyes, we should have been prudent enough to have had armed security.

I know of incidents whereby people lost some of their assets because they did not have armed security where they brought the public.

It seems that you don't understand the liability issues related to public events in city parks.

Some cities and general liability insurance companies will require armed security guards at certain events.

But, it appears that you don't understand these type of things, but I do.

Finally, any reasonable person would have, after considering that possibility, would have simply said: "I don't think we need to bring in armed security. We won't to go forward with the event with out them."

I would have said: "Ok. No problem. I was just wanted to pass it by you to see what you think."

It is YOU who are effecting a grand escape here, by attaching the first of what we expect to have been a long series of unreasonable demands that would all culminate in a single result; the rejection of your claim and the cancellation of the JREF Challenge preliminary test.

You are assuming here Kramer. In fact, you are the one sounding deluded when you say you expected me to come up with a "long series of unreasonable demands" when I never gave the first demand.

All I did was to mention having armed guards, and your mind created the delusion that I was going to present a long list of unreasonable demands based on only one consideration I presented! Wow!

This is the standard technique of all those who make claims that they know they are unable to provide evidence for.

But, this does not relate to me!

I have been successful in calling down UFO for years!

And, I was the first man who successfully called down UFOs for a television station and what I do will continue.

So, I have consistently proven my abilities long before I ever heard of you all or you all heard of me.

Now, you are really the one sounding deluded!

We have no more time to waste on questions about firearms, or the closing of a public park, or whetever you had prepared for us next.

What are you talking about?

Once again, you are the one who is sounding deluded Kramer.

I never once said anything about closing of a public park or suggested it!

I only mentioned having armed security present as a psychological deterent to something going wrong, and if something went wrong, they would be in a better position to stop it.

On top of that, I was considering off duty police officers to be the armed security.

And, as for whatever I had prepared for you next, man, your job is really adversely affecting you.

The only thing I was considering to say next was: "Ok. No problem. I agree not to have any armed security since you all are taking it so seriously."

Kramer, man, it appears that you have been into so conflicts with the idiots who are playing games with you until you have lost your tact to negotiate with a candidate, especially one like me.

And we are not saddened or surprised at all that you would behave as you have in this email. All applicants do so when things begin to turn sour for them. You are no different.

Man, you have lost your objectivity here and are starting to view all your candidates as being the same to such a degree that it has affected your tact in dealing appropriately in negotiations.

I am not like all applicants in that I was blessed by the most holy and wonderful YAHWEH to make world news in what I do before I ever heard of your organization.

You are deluded, sir, as evidenced by your utter misrepresentation of the actual facts of our correspondence, which I will not endeavor to clarify for you, as we know that you will continue to see it your way, and publicize it as such. We will waste no more time on this matter.

I am not deluded, you are.

You are the one who sent me two back to back over reactive emails and did not even give me the chance to explain or seek clarification of what I was talking about before telling me, in the second one:

Based upon this morning's request by you for armed security at the JREF Challenge test, Randi and I have decided to cancel the test without further discussion.

We wish you the very best.


And, in your communications below and the other emails after it, you did not include it in the reply history. Was it so it could not be seen?

Regardless, I have reinstated it.

And, after telling me the event was cancelled "without further discussion," you sent me another email discussing more about it so that the even could go forward.

Also, when you say:

... we know that you will continue to see it your way.

Once again, I changed my mind and no longer saw it my way and was preparing to email you about it.

And, you call me deluded?

You went on to say:

... and publicize it as such.

Kramer, after you emailed me saything that the event was cancelled, and there would be no more discussion.

I said to myself, I will not let people know about this because it will cast a bad light on Kramer and Randi.

I will keep it to myself and not publicize it.

So, once again, you are wrong and the one deluded.

By your own words, you see all the applicants as taking the same course of action, having the same intentions, and that you know what they are planning.

But, in my case you are absolutely and totally wrong again as you have been consistently wrong when it comes to me.

Your file has been closed. This is our final communication with you.

No problem.

You said that before: "Randi and I have decided to cancel the test without further discussion", and you, in the same hour, started discussing the issue with me again.

And, you call me deluded when your are the one sounding deluded.

My name was no longer on the list of applicants anyway. So in my eyes and the eyes of the person who contact me telling that it was removed, my file has been closed before now.

Kramer, listen to me closely.

When you think that a person may be misinterpreting things, try being more tactful in the way you deal with them.

You don't have to come against them so strongly and close their cases without any further discussions without giving them a chance to explain.

Use more tactful in the way you deal with them.

I am use to people doing me like you have done me.

I can take it.

I have demonstrated my gift and my abilities have been consistently proven, and they will continue to be proven.

Don't let those who are playing games with you Kramer get to you.

There are people who are real and not like all the others you've experienced.

I am one of them, and you will certainly consider this in the future when I am revealed to the world by YAHWEH with His spaceships and UFOs.

Use more tact Kramer; use more tact and be the skillful negotiator you should be.

You see, I don't need the randi.org to validate me; I have been validated before by KTNV ABC TV-13 and many witnesses over the years before I ever heard of you.

And, I will continue to be validated with YAHWEH's blessings.

We will waste no more time on this matter.

Well, since you all have twice terminated my case, in a couple of hours, neither will I Kramer, because I have other validations that have been developed and are ripe production.

Sincerely,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller


=======================================================

Dear Prophet Yahweh,

Thank you for this final communication, and thank you for the good advice.

We continue to wish you the very best.

-Kramer, JREF
 
IN THE BLESSED AND HOLY NAME OF YAHWEH

Dear Kramer,

Thank you very much.

As for me, no one will hear about this; I will keep it to myself.

No hard feelings on my side.

Thanks Kramer, and take care.

Sincerely,

Prophet Yahweh
Seer of Yahweh
Master UFO Caller


=======================================================

Thank YOU, Prophet Yahweh, and no hard feelings here, either.

Peace.

-Kramer, JREF
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom