The PF9/11 Truth Video

[000063]

If my paragraph is not good enough for you, you can follow the link I put into my earlier post. Here, all the details you want and Reheat knows very well. But it REALLY isn't necessary if one is familiar with the witness accounts and understands what Reheat did in his "debunking".

I thought you said it would only take a paragraph? Yet that link seems to have a good deal more than a paragraph. In fact, it also seems to have a lot of backpedalling. Eyewitnesses are unreliable, as anyone involved in the law can tell one. And CIT are still positing nonsense about "decoy aircraft" which apparently vanished. And the same witnesses CIT is relying on also say the plane hit the Pentagon, yet CIT thinks it was a decoy. If you want to complain about someone cherry-picking...

He's right, the matter is settled since years. His work is pseudo-scientific claptrap created to deceive casual observers and MikeW is aware of it but lets it stay on his website. That's why I brought it up in the other thread.

By way of attempting to discredit MikeW instead of the actual arguments he was making, yes. As I asserted several times, it had no real relevance to the thread.

 

[beachnut]

If my paragraph is not good enough for you, you can follow the link I put into my earlier post. Here, all the details you want and Reheat knows very well. But it REALLY isn't necessary if one is familiar with the witness accounts and understands what Reheat did in his "debunking".

He's right, the matter is settled since years. His work is pseudo-scientific claptrap created to deceive casual observers and MikeW is aware of it but lets it stay on his website. That's why I brought it up in the other thread.

All the witnesses, CIT witnesses, and all the other witnesses, verify 77's real flight path as seen by RADAR and FDR. Of course you must be trained as an aircraft accident investigator, or be naturally smart (albeit, I was trained). CIT are moronsidiots on 911; why do you fall for lies from moronsidiots on 911?

Reheat's work is called math, yes CIT would call it pseudo-science. I understand why CIT can't figure out math and flight stuff, why can't you? Even Paik is pointing to the real flight path, only CIT can't figure that out.