• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The other parties

Airfix

Graduate Poster
Airfix
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
1,047
It strikes me that Hilary and Donald are both equally terrible candidates.

What other options are open to American voters ?
 
None - it's going to be either / or unless the big parties decide to replace them.
The Libertarians are on all the ballots, and I think in 4 years we'll see more parties making a bid.
But for November it's too late, though having Johnson in one of the Debates would be interesting.
 
Airfix said:
It strikes me that Hilary and Donald are both equally terrible candidates.

What other options are open to American voters ?
Click to expand...

Your view might be modified depending on what you believe the essential fight is about . If you see The Witch as a criminal person jointly heading a Crime Syndicate who is the friend of anybody with money , regardless of their globalist flavour : And The Donald as a force who wants to wreck the aims of world government by the likes of Nathaniel Rothschild and George Soros : Then an appropriate vote is necessary and even required on moral grounds -- let alone future self protection .
 
Malbec said:
Your view might be modified depending on what you believe the essential fight is about . If you see The Witch as a criminal person jointly heading a Crime Syndicate who is the friend of anybody with money , regardless of their globalist flavour : And The Donald as a force who wants to wreck the aims of world government by the likes of Nathaniel Rothschild and George Soros : Then an appropriate vote is necessary and even required on moral grounds -- let alone future self protection .
Click to expand...

If you believe Trump aim is that, I have a bridge to sell you , cheap, in Brooklyn. More likely what the trump want is to make the trump richer and more powerful, possibly leave a legacy, a footprint in history, and he will tell some part of the voters what they want to hear, whether he believes it or not, or even plan to do something for it or not. That's about it. As such, Trump is more dangerous than Clinton. Whatever I think about the shenanigan with her fecundation and finance or email, she represent stability, which is what the world need, not more chaos.

But believe whatever you want.
 
Malbec said:
Your view might be modified depending on what you believe the essential fight is about . If you see The Witch as a criminal person jointly heading a Crime Syndicate who is the friend of anybody with money , regardless of their globalist flavour : And The Donald as a force who wants to wreck the aims of world government by the likes of Nathaniel Rothschild and George Soros : Then an appropriate vote is necessary and even required on moral grounds -- let alone future self protection .
Click to expand...

As usual with a Malbec post, none of the wild accusations have any evidence and to most people are miles wide of the mark.
 
Aepervius said:
If you believe Trump aim is that, I have a bridge to sell you , cheap, in Brooklyn. More likely what the trump want is to make the trump richer and more powerful, possibly leave a legacy, a footprint in history, and he will tell some part of the voters what they want to hear, whether he believes it or not, or even plan to do something for it or not. That's about it. As such, Trump is more dangerous than Clinton. Whatever I think about the shenanigan with her fecundation and finance or email, she represent stability, which is what the world need, not more chaos.

But believe whatever you want.
Click to expand...

You are ascribing matters to somebody you do not even know .Dangerous . I happen to believe that 90% plus of all leaders are vain , power hungry and greedy .Probably Sociopathic , if not psychopathic . But that does not stop me choosing a lesser evil , hoping that occasionally " we " advance in real terms .In contrast , Hillary the Lesbian Witch represents War -- all globalists know that never ending war is the only path to wealth and power .The one attribute she can never give is stability . It is anathema to Luciferians .
 
Malbec said:
You are ascribing matters to somebody you do not even know .Dangerous . I happen to believe that 90% plus of all leaders are vain , power hungry and greedy .Probably Sociopathic , if not psychopathic . But that does not stop me choosing a lesser evil , hoping that occasionally " we " advance in real terms .
Click to expand...

I guess I cannot challenge your beliefs but your continued lack of evidence for your outlandish claims makes me think that they are not founded on facts.

Malbec said:
In contrast , Hillary the Lesbian Witch represents War -- all globalists know that never ending war is the only path to wealth and power .The one attribute she can never give is stability . It is anathema to Luciferians .
Click to expand...

As usual, evidence that:

- Hillary is a witch
- Hillary is a lesbian
 
I can't ever imagine voting for one of the fringe parties, but they are amusing to listen to. We have the Libertarians and the Green Party of course... Fairly mainstream by now.
But each election cycle brings out the real fringe guys who often hang around the outskirts of the big conventions handing out pamphlets to anyone who'll take one.
Usually, NPR manages to interview a few of these guys.... Always interesting.

I recall the "The Rent Is Too High" guy with some fondness.
 
Johnson has an interesting sales-pitch:

elect us, and we might be able to get the two parties to compromise.

He might be right.
 
Aepervius said:
If you believe Trump aim is that, I have a bridge to sell you , cheap, in Brooklyn. More likely what the trump want is to make the trump richer and more powerful, possibly leave a legacy, a footprint in history, and he will tell some part of the voters what they want to hear, whether he believes it or not, or even plan to do something for it or not. That's about it. As such, Trump is more dangerous than Clinton. Whatever I think about the shenanigan with her fecundation and finance or email, she represent stability, which is what the world need, not more chaos.

But believe whatever you want.
Click to expand...

Strongly agree with the first part and I do not disagree with the second part.
Clinton does at least have a bit of experience.
 
Airfix said:
It strikes me that Hilary and Donald are both equally terrible candidates.

What other options are open to American voters ?
Click to expand...

Not voting, pissing your vote away, or accepting the inevitable. That's it.

I'm "with" Her.
 
If your country had a broad range of parties of equal chance of success, would you still vote with her, or with someone who more closely represented your opinions ?

If for example, Bernie Sanders had got enough financial clout to stand independently, what effect would that have ?

I know the question is hypothetical as, Hilary will probably be President, but if someone beyond the two candiates were to be / should be President, who would you like that person to be ?
 
Airfix said:
If your country had a broad range of parties of equal chance of success, would you still vote with her, or with someone who more closely represented your opinions ?

If for example, Bernie Sanders had got enough financial clout to stand independently, what effect would that have ?

I know the question is hypothetical as, Hilary will probably be President, but if someone beyond the two candiates were to be / should be President, who would you like that person to be ?
Click to expand...
First Past The Post tends to create two party systems, it's known as Duverger's law.
 
I registered Green in 2000 but ended up voting for Gore. Then I got sick of Green spam and reregisteed "neokaczinskiist" until this cycle when I registered Republican.
 
Mader Levap said:
Is there any particular reason for that name in registration?
Click to expand...

I made it up, based on the writings of mathematician and social theorist Dr. T. J. Kaczynski. Some of his underlying ideas are worth discussion, if one can seperate the liquor of truth from his mucky brew of psychological baggage and poor choice of sociopolitical expression medium.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom