The Most Foolish Theory in Physics

[Singularitarian]

Not for you, not for anyone. I am not here to bow when commanded.

 

[Paul]

Not for you, not for anyone. I am not here to bow when commanded.

How is it that you expect to earn a doctorate?

 

[Raze]

In the future sir, so we can be clear about our differences, will you speak up and show me where i am wrong.

I am dealing with people who didn't know about the absolute sqaure of the wave function, an amplitude process, taught to (I thought) every second grader.

Okay, you mention the wave function, so how about you do some math with a wave function for us? I could post some partial differential equations for you to solve.

Oh, and the claim that 2nd graders are taught wave mechanics is utterly ridiculous, and only makes you even less credible than you already appear since you can't solve a 2nd year physics problem (which, by the way, is a COUPLED OSCILLATION PROBLEM = the mathematics of WAVES...)

I am dealing with people who are telling me [latex]E=\pm Mc^2[/latex] is wrong, yet negative virtual energy can only be described by a negative solution. I had someone mistake this with the charge i beleive, thinking that positive observables are associated with such a solution in the Hamiltonian. After countless posts suggesting he was wrong, not alone proving him wrong, i have yet to receive an apology under his cloak of ignorance. I've even dealt with people trying to tell me that the photon experiences a time because of a frequency related to time, but have not obviously studied the math long enough to realize that no time passes for a photon, it can't, a strict mathematical certainty, but they still persisted.

So yeh, please speak up in the future, instead of this reduntant patter that holds to nothing.

So basically you are resting your credibility on the Hamiltonian, yet you can't even answer the first part of my problem, the part using the Euler–Lagrange equation?

Are you not aware that the Euler–Lagrange equation is nearly identical to the Hamiltonian–Jacobi equation? I mean, there is quite the deep relationship between Hamilton's principle and the Euler-Lagrange equation.




I do not believe you have any real specialized knowledge of physics. I believe you read popular publications and then pretend to be more knowledgeable than you really are. You may think you can run and jump before you can suckle, but believe me you are quite wrong.

 

[Monketi Ghost]