The Most Foolish Theory in Physics

[Singularitarian]

Gibberish.



(a) "That is why"? Nonsense. The second sentence does not follow from the first.
(b) Both sentences are wrong.

I don't know what


''(a) "That is why"? Nonsense. The second sentence does not follow from the first.
(b) Both sentences are wrong.''


..means.

 

[ben m]

No, the example you have given is an intentional red-herring, because the appearance of the photons can be described through decay processes. The appearance of matter at the fundamental vacuum level is just with what i said, and the conservation law is broken; your example conserves it.

There is no "appearance of matter at a fundamental vacuum level".

Answer three questions: True or false: my deuterium lamp is full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: the Universe was once full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: hot plasmas emit light.

 

[Singularitarian]

You guys are competely wrong.

What do you think it means ''vacuum energy'' and what is the cosmological constant generally?

I've had enough for today, i think its time for a rest - i've spent nearly 2 and 1/2 hours on you guys already.

 

[Singularitarian]

There is no "appearance of matter at a fundamental vacuum level".

Answer three questions: True or false: my deuterium lamp is full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: the Universe was once full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: hot plasmas emit light.

Before I go ben,you had a cheek to send me a PM entitled ''how to become physicist,'' when you deny the ''appearance of matter at a fundamental level''.

You've obviously never heard of the term ''quantum foam.''

 

[ben m]

You guys are competely wrong.

What do you think it means ''vacuum energy'' and what is the cosmological constant generally?

"vacuum energy" is, as you seem to recognize, the vacuum analogue of the 1/2hv-ground-state energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator; it can be observed via the Casimir effect.

"The cosmological constant" is some unknown property of the Universe, possibly related to vacuum energy; we know about it only via its effect on the Universe's expansion rate.

No one objects to the idea that those two might be the same thing; they certainly seem to have the same equation-of-state.

The unrelated CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background) is a particular batch of photons which was emitted by the Big Bang at a particular time.

The unrelated CNB (Cosmic Neutrino Background) is a particular batch of neutrinos which was emitted by the Big Bang at a particular time.

 

[ben m]

Before I go ben,you had a cheek to send me a PM entitled ''how to become physicist,'' when you deny the ''appearance of matter at a fundamental level''.

Well, matter had to "appear" in the early Big Bang, via some process we are thus far only guessing at. Matter particles "appear" in various energy-conserving interactions today. Virtual particles, of course, are everywhere all the time.

None of this has anything to do with either (a) my deuterium lamp or (b) the CMB.

You've obviously never heard of the term ''quantum foam.''

Is that more or less obvious than your other assertions?

 

[ben m]

Answer three questions: True or false: my deuterium lamp is full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: the Universe was once full of hot hydrogen plasma.

True or false: hot plasmas emit light.

Answer the questions, please.

 

[Singularitarian]

More than obvious.

Clarent, bold, cojent, involved, apparent, consistent, non-antipethetic, non-insipid and perhaps slightly enlightening, but no.... It's not relied on complete blindness. After the appearance of extra energy in the vacuum which seems to appear, the ZPF remains the main mechanism in which ordinary things comes into play.

Essential diffeomorphisms suggest that the equations must result in some originator of energy and matter, (this would include the CMB). This energy, like all energy emerges from a zero-point solution.

 

[Singularitarian]

Answer the questions, please.

Yes, the universe either evolved from a soup of plasma gas, or photon gas, depending on what theory you adopt. What of it?

 

[ben m]

Yes, the universe either evolved from a soup of plasma gas, or photon gas, depending on what theory you adopt. What of it?

Good heavens, you *are* making things up!

No, please answer the questions one by one.

 

[lightfire22000]

ordinary means without honours, all the others implicitly mean with honours. You wouldn't be considered for a PhD without either a first or upper second.

I don't know about Physics, but in electrical engineering, I know people that graduated with GPAs below three flat and they got into PhD programs after boosting their grades a bit.

 

[Singularitarian]

Good heavens, you *are* making things up!

No, please answer the questions one by one.

You've never heard of Luxon Theory, or the Gluon-Quark Plasma gas theories obviously?

 

[ben m]

You've never heard of Luxon Theory, or the Gluon-Quark Plasma gas theories obviously?

There are exactly zero mainstream astro or particle-physics publications on a "luxon theory". No, I have not heard of it.

QGP is reasonably well-established as the state of the Universe when it was *very* hot, at quite early times. It cooled from a QGP into baryon gas, then ... guess what? A hydrogen plasma.

Please answer the three questions one at a time.

 

[Singularitarian]

Read these then which publish a total photon universe theory... you surely did not think i would have said this without reason..?

Similar Theories: Heraclitus, Kelvin, Ziegler, Schrödinger and ... A theory of everything and a mathematical formulation of a philosophy ... Luxon theory by Daniel M. Kirchmann. Luxon theory ...
www.unitytheory.info/similar_theories.html - Cached - Similar -

And that was just one of many elated articles which appeared from one simple google.

 

[Pastor Bentonit]

You guys are competely wrong. <snip>

Singul, please please take my advice (but you won't; oh boy you need to get back onto your meds, they're good for you). Coming to a forum like this, chock full of extremely well educated people and using ever, ever, any phrase to that effect, will lose you every discussion faster than calling an opponent a Nazi.

EPIC fail, Singul.

 

[Singularitarian]

My meds aren't even fully-developed yet; as it is aliens that come from the future and give them personally to me and only me by using Einsteins amazing laws of relativity, and then they take me for wine at my local restaurant.

 

[lionking]

Singul, please please take my advice (but you won't; oh boy you need to get back onto your meds, they're good for you). Coming to a forum like this, chock full of extremely well educated people and using ever, ever, any phrase to that effect, will lose you every discussion faster than calling an opponent a Nazi.

EPIC fail, Singul.

Not to mention the rudness and disrespect when someone politely points out obvious errors in singularitarian's arguments.

 

[Pastor Bentonit]

My meds aren't even fully-developed yet; as it is aliens that come from the future and give them personally to me and only me by using Einsteins amazing laws of relativity, and then they take me for wine at my local restaurant.

We're working on them meds.

 

[Singularitarian]

Obvious?

I am dealing with the uneducated, if i truely am uneducated in your eyes as to make such claims. I've had enough for one night, as to another day!

 

[Singularitarian]

We're working on them meds.

Just next time tell my alien friends to give me one bottle of buckfast and a couple of joints. That will suit me quite well, as it does every scotsman, practically.