winter salt
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- May 24, 2017
- Messages
- 484
Hear,hear! A solid and thorough argument.
If you don't mind me asking, are you a native speaker of Arabic? Because I'm having a hard time understanding if Arabic has more than one past tense (it looks to me that way). 'Cause if that's the case there's a bunch of problems understanding what happened first and what happened later, as so many contradicting English versions of each verse show.
I don't have any serious training in Arabic. I used to know by heart 320 pages of the Koran and the meaning of every single word of it through my basic knowledge of Arabic and through interpretations. (One reason it's easy to memorize the Koran is that it's repetitive and the grammar and words [and the topics] are to a large part are basic.) It's been 20 years I do not get involved with it. If I hear the Koran I pretty much know what is being said though (providing it doesn't talk about some worldly orders of its author).
Arabic today is nothing like the Arabic in the Koran and Hadith. And the Arabic in the Koran is slightly different from the Hadith. Muslims believe because the Koran is the direct word of Allah while the Hadith is inspired to Mohammad and is Mohammad's own words. I used to believe that too. But now I have an intelligent understanding of the difference. It's is about the time lapse. Hadith were collected more than a century later and from a wider geography. And also the Koran is heard 24/7 by (Arab) Muslims while Hadith are not. So there is more familiarity with one. That's a contributor to the feeling of Koran being different than Mohammad's own sayings. And they -in time- developed a recitation tradition and it being the only allowed musical application of sound (human voice as songs and instruments being forbidden) and they got pretty good and magical in it. It is the best wrap (recitation) that a crop could be presented as "gift".
Last edited:
