The MikeW Appreciation Thread

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,660
Location
Australia
Yet again, I searched this subforum for information on a 9/11 CT topic, and the best results linked to MikeW's awesome 911myths.com.

Visiting the site for the umpteenth time, I found a wealth of in-depth information on that topic that even went above and beyond my requirements.

I just want to show my appreciation for his outstanding efforts in this field. Thankyou, MikeW. Thankyou.

I hope others will join me in showing their thanks.
 
911myths=one of the best sources for 9/11 conspiracy theories. It's one of the best collections of news reports, and various other sources I've ever seen, always one of the first places I turn when reading about 9/11 conspiracy theories.
 
911myths.com was the first site I found when I was looking for information to rebut Loose Change. At that site, I found more than enough information to convince me that LC was a pack of lies.

Brilliant site, and I highly recommend it to anyone who needs a clue-bat to use on a Twoofer friend or relative.
 
Along with FactCheck's debunking911.com, and Gravy's Loose Change Guide, 9/11 Myths is one of the best resources for 9/11 related information.

Thanks for all the work Mike!
 
Aww! :o Thanks!

There's a lot I'm not happy about with the current site, but that should begin to change when I begin to roll out the new wikified version. The first look at that should be available next month sometime, & hopefully that'll prove much more useful to everyone.
 
Mike, I hardly knew ye. But you will be missed.

What? You're not dead? HUZZAH!! Miracles do happen!

I'm bored.
 
I agree, Mikes site is over flowing with great information. At one time it was just me and Mike with debunking sites. He was more interested in the logical fallacies and pentagon stuff and I tried to take the controlled demolition part. Now 911myths is more well rounded than debunking911 I think.
 
FactCheck said:
He was more interested in the logical fallacies and pentagon stuff and I tried to take the controlled demolition part. Now 911myths is more well rounded than debunking911 I think.
Click to expand...
Probably, but the controlled demolition stuff is what most people really want to read about, so it kind of evens out. :)
 
I just want to add my note of appreciation for MikeW and FactCheck. Their two sites are terrific resources for debunking! Thanks, guys!

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

:wave1
 
What I find most compelling about 911myths is the overall tone of the site. It doesn't patronise, preach or overplay its hand, it simply says, "Here's what the truth movement says; here's the real information; you're intelligent enough to work it out for yourself." That is, I think ,the most powerful way to convince an intelligent audience - simply give them enough information and let them supply the reasoning.

It was 911myths that led me from uninformed disbelief of the 9/11 CTs to clear certainty that the whole thing was total BS from first to last, and it would be the first site I'd recommend to anyone who had concerns that the CTs might have merit but was open-minded enough to question those concerns. Thanks, Mike, for all the hard work; it's very much appreciated.

Dave
 
Great work, both Mike and FactCheck! I have also used 911myths a lot, as well as debunking911.


:clap:

Greetings from France btw. Nice country, great sights, good wine, strange language :p Bonjour everyone! Also visited the top of France's tallest building. You can't help but think how awful it was for those at WTC, when visiting places like that. Now I'm back home and it rains. Can't win every time.

For 911myths and debunking911, keep on going strong.

:cheerleader5
 
Huzzah! Mike's outstanding work gave all of us newcomers a head start of YEARS, and he keeps pumping it out, and is working on a new site. (Cue Tina Turner's "Simply the Best")

Thanks, Mike!
 
I've mentioned 911myths.com so often on 'Hardfire' that some cretin asked me in an e-mail how much I get paid to do it.
 
pomeroo said:
I've mentioned 911myths.com so often on 'Hardfire' that some cretin asked me in an e-mail how much I get paid to do it.
Click to expand...
How ridiculous!

As if you need that, given the fat regular NWO-paycheck you get weekly.
 
Thanks for the heads-up, Firestone!

Yay, Mike, again!! :) I'm just having a browse, and the new site looks great so far.
 
Thanks all! I'd have mentioned this earlier except the same day I opened it, my web host started misbehaving and ever since it's been impossibly slow. Although it seems to be better now...?

Anyway, as you can see, the main new feature comes in collecting and displaying more evidence up-front - photos, videos, documents, quotes etc. I'm not currently happy about the format for this, though. All too often it ends up nothing more than a lengthy list of bullet points ( see the bottom of http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=The_Hijackers ), and as I add more information it'll only get worse.

Still, that can probably be fixed with a little thought, more sections or something. And it's far more accessible under this format than it would be with the old site, so I'm making progress, of sorts!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom