The Kofi Annan Hypocrisy Agenda

[CapelDodger]

From JK

That paternity fraud statistic of 30% is also from blood tests which almost all states require.

This sounds absolutely crazy for a country where the population threatens mayhem if they can't own more than 50 guns. State-enforced paternity tests? Don't American women have the vote? Or the right to bear arms? Because if they're playing away that much ... Nah, this is just an attempt to promote tourism.

Something JK is missing is that the only way the UN could be created in the first place was by making it powerless. One of its two founding principles is that sovereignty remains, under all circumstances, with the member nations. Without that, forget it. When it comes to military action it simply provides a convenient venue for forming alliances. If that alliance is sufficient to get an un-vetoed majority of the Security Council - or a majority of the General Council (I think I'm right there: Joshua Korosi, love your work, you can put me straight there if you haven't already) - you get Korea, if not you get Vietnam.

 

[Jedi Knight]

You are either deliberately misrepresenting the statistics presented in the web site (the three pdf files) or you simply do not understand what the statistics are saying.

In the state of Georgia:
9,650 cases were tested with a 30.2% exclusion (i.e. erroneous) rate

Nationwide in 2001:
310,490 cases tested (not "millions") with a 29.25% exclusion rate.

What "state required" blood tests are you referring to? I have lived in 5 states as an adult and have never been "required" by any state government to take a blood test for any reason including getting a marriage license.

When you and your wife applied for your marriage license you had to give your blood type, right? When the baby is born blood is taken from the baby and then it is compared to the parents. Now it is possible that the baby could have the same blood type with the mother and a different "daddy", but that is only if the named daddy and the real daddy have the same blood type. That is one way to determine paternity.

The other way and the more accurate method is DNA testing.

JK

 

[Bjorn]

When you and your wife applied for your marriage license you had to give your blood type, right? When the baby is born blood is taken from the baby and then it is compared to the parents. Now it is possible that the baby could have the same blood type with the mother and a different "daddy", but that is only if the named daddy and the real daddy have the same blood type. That is one way to determine paternity.

JK

Jedi, if the mother is blood type 'A' and the father is blood type 'B', what blood type do you think the child would be?











Answer: The child could be blood type 'A', 'B', 'AB', or 'O'.

I think you are inventing facts once again.

Please read a bit on the subject before you post more about it unless you want to make a fool of yourself.

 

[Crossbow]

While it is true that a few states do require blood tests prior to the marriage, the tests are used to check the applicants for some sexually transmitted diseases.

The tests are not used to check the paterinty of children that may be born of the wife.

There is not a state in the country that has mandatory paterinty checks.

 

[NightG1]

When you and your wife applied for your marriage license you had to give your blood type, right?

No. And no blood sample or test was required by the State of Texas.

When the baby is born blood is taken from the baby and then it is compared to the parents.

Not at either of the two hospitals (one in Dallas and one in Houston) where my children were born. I did not know what my blood type was until I applied for life insurance and requested the analysis then. There was no default test for paternity at the hospital. Are you fishing now?

Now it is possible that the baby could have the same blood type with the mother and a different "daddy", but that is only if the named daddy and the real daddy have the same blood type. That is one way to determine paternity.

What does this have to do with the 30% exclusion rate from the "millions" of samples you invented in an earlier post. This type of obfuscation is common in your "debating" style. Why don't you just admit you were wrong - for once.

 

[NightG1]

While it is true that a few states do require blood tests prior to the marriage, the tests are used to check the applicants for some sexually transmitted diseases.

The tests are not used to check the paterinty of children that may be born of the wife.

There is not a state in the country that has mandatory paterinty checks.

Pssssst... Crossbow.... Lets see how he wriggles out of this one.