The Jan. 6 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
mgidm86 said:
"Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!"
Click to expand...

In addition to Mike Pence:

House impeachment manager Stacey Plaskett says Pelosi was rushed to a secure offsite location because some of the rioters publicly declared their intent to harm or kill Pelosi.
Click to expand...
https://www.firstpost.com/world/us-...-kill-house-speaker-nancy-pelosi-9292031.html
"The first of us who got upstairs kicked in Nancy Pelosi's office door and pushed down the halls toward her inner sanctum, the mob howling with rage. 'Crazy Nancy' probably would have been torn into little pieces, but she was nowhere to be seen," said Plaskett, reading from William Calhoun's Facebook account.

Calhoun, a lawyer from Georgia, has since been charged for his role in the Jan. 6th insurrection.

As Plaskett continued her presentation, she offered new video of the mob and its violent attempts to locate Speaker Pelosi.

"Where are you, Nancy? We're looking for you!" bellowed rioters seen in the video. "She's in here," shouted one man, followed by another:

"Nancy? Oh, Nancy? Nancy, where are you, Nancy?"
Click to expand...

But I'm sure they were just joking....
 
Ziggurat said:
Is it your position that Jerome Corsi is a credible witness whose testimony in court will lead to Trump's conviction?

I'm not seeing it.
Click to expand...

No Corsi would definitely lie to Congress, but that Lie could easily be turned into a plea deaĺ,
Corsi also knows the Truth about Russian Collusion and might come clean on that to protect himself.
 
Stacyhs said:
Corsi doesn't have to appear in court as a witness if there is documented proof as in videos, tweets, emails, etc. And he would be declared a hostile witness anyway.
Click to expand...

Proof of what? His claims?

Why would what he said on a YouTube video be any more credible than what he might have to say under oath? That seems even less credible.

And if you're referring to Corsi claiming there's documented proof that can be relied upn... well, why on earth would you believe him about that?
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
No Corsi would definitely lie to Congress, but that Lie could easily be turned into a plea deaĺ,
Corsi also knows the Truth about Russian Collusion and might come clean on that to protect himself.
Click to expand...

Why would you believe Corsi actually knows anything?
 
Ziggurat said:
Why would you believe Corsi actually knows anything?
Click to expand...

Read the Mueller Report Corsi's defense was he had a personal meeting with God.

Funny It was RTV Moscow that asked me to debunk Corsi's 9/11NO Planer theories in February 2008. I suspect Corsi of being a Russian useful idiot for decades with Friends at RTV, Just Like Alex Jones.
 
mgidm86 said:
"Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!" "Kill Mike Pence!"
Click to expand...

It seems like they were trying to tell us something but I can't put my finger on it.
 
Stacyhs said:
But I'm sure they were just joking....
Click to expand...

That wasn't the question. The question was what was planned. Violent intent in the moment does not demonstrate a plan. That, in fact, is one of the reasons mobs are so dangerous. They can turn violent even when nobody wanted them to at the start.
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
Read the Mueller Report Corsi's defense was he had a personal meeting with God.

Funny It was RTV Moscow that asked me to debunk Corsi's 9/11NO Planer theories in February 2008. I suspect Corsi of being a Russian useful idiot for decades with Friends at RTV, Just Like Alex Jones.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you agree with me, then, that he's not a credible witness or source.
 
Ziggurat said:
That wasn't the question. The question was what was planned. Violent intent in the moment does not demonstrate a plan. That, in fact, is one of the reasons mobs are so dangerous. They can turn violent even when nobody wanted them to at the start.
Click to expand...

Oh, just stop it. Your insistence that Jan. 6 wasn't an attempted coup because it wasn't 'planned' is just a transparent attempt to downplay what happened. What happened on Jan 6 was an attempt to stop the process of a legitimate election and prevent Biden's inauguration.

Coup: "a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government."

Did the mob attempt to suddenly and illegally seize the power of the Congress by stopping the verification? YES.
Was the intent to put Trump back in office by declaring he really won the election: YES.

What do you think "Stop the Steal" means?
 
From MSNBC on Friday discussing the planning in plain sight that wasn't found by the FBI (7 minutes 26 seconds):

 
Last edited:
Skeptic Ginger said:
From MSNBC on Friday discussing the planning in plain sight that wasn't found by the FBI (7 minutes 26 seconds):

Click to expand...

:thumbsup:

The Jan. 6 Commission is seeking the phone records of "several hundred people", including members of Congress. Anyone want to make a bet that's going to include McCarthy?
 
Stacyhs said:
:thumbsup:

The Jan. 6 Commission is seeking the phone records of "several hundred people", including members of Congress. Anyone want to make a bet that's going to include McCarthy?
Click to expand...


The following GQP Congress Critters will now be coughing in their rompers.


Boebert
Hawley
Taylor-Greene
Jordan
Gosar
Gaetz
Brooks
Johnson
Cruz (maybe?)


Any others?
 
Last edited:
Once again, Trump does not seem to understand that he is no longer President:

Trump Flips Out at House Committee After It Requests Secret Capitol Riot Documents

Former president Donald Trump has threatened to use presidential powers, despite no longer being president. On Wednesday, he said he would invoke executive privilege to block the House Select Committee from investigating documents containing communications tied to the Capitol riots. “Executive privilege will be defended, not just on behalf of my Administration and the Patriots who worked beside me, but on behalf of the Office of the President of the United States and the future of our Nation,” the ex-president said in a statement. Trump’s successor Joe Biden will have the final say over whether the information can be shared, and the Biden administration has said it won’t stand in the way of the committee’s investigation. CNN reports that the documents Trump is trying to block include records from the Departments of Justice, Interior and Defense as well as the National Archives, which host Trump’s records while in office. In his angry statement, Trump also called the committee “a partisan sham and a waste of taxpayer dollars.”
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom