The Great Thermate Debate

superlogicalthinker said:
NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations

http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/list_of_codes_and_standards.asp

http://www.nfpa.org/aboutthecodes/AboutTheCodes.asp?DocNum=921


Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content








Exotic accelerants I believe.

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content
Click to expand...

No, I said QUOTE. Not point me to where I can buy the book.

Can you quote, word for word (which is what a quote is) one passage from Chapter 19? One passage, one sentence. 2001 version should do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
triforcharity said:
NFPA 921. Show me that you know what it is, and I will gladly log on.

Quote one passage from chapter 19 for me.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

"Although an explosion is almost always accompanied by the production of a loud noise, the noise itself is not an essential element in the definition of an explosion. The generation and violent escape of gases are the primary criteria of an explosion."

NFPA Gudlines 2001. It is not a law, but is FF 101.

Is this where you were going????

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content
 
Last edited by a moderator:
superlogicalthinker said:
I didn't bring it up. Your FF did.
Click to expand...

No, you did. Remember this?

superlogicalthinker said:
because FEMA told them that further investigation for the source of the sulfur was needed. Also, NFPA guidlines recommend it. Dop you not think they should have tested for it? Even 1 test? They say they didn't test because nobody heard explosions.
Click to expand...


You don't even know NFPA regulations. I know them, work with them, and can find anything you want to know about NFPA and their guidelines.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
"Although an explosion is almost always accompanied by the production of a loud noise, the noise itself is not an essential element in the definition of an explosion. The generation and violent escape of gases are the primary criteria of an explosion."

NFPA Gudlines 2001. It is not a law, but is FF 101.

Is this where you were going????

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content
Click to expand...


Can a backdraft be loosely defined as an explosion? and can it sever structural steel? yes or no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
superlogicalthinker said:
"Although an explosion is almost always accompanied by the production of a loud noise, the noise itself is not an essential element in the definition of an explosion. The generation and violent escape of gases are the primary criteria of an explosion."

NFPA Gudlines 2001. It is not a law, but is FF 101.

Is this where you were going????

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content
Click to expand...

That's 18, BTW.

Nice job though. www.firefighterfor911truth.com

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed off topic content
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So now the US government is so powerful that they can keep things out of respected peer-reviewed papers--anywhere in the world.

Be afraid; is there no end to their power?
 
He won't read it. It hurts his delusions.

I'll download this, and go see if he knows the first thing about NFPA 921.

I'll let ya'll know.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
You can still hear em right? Big deal if they came from after the collapse, do you know haw they prepare a building for demolition? Obviously not. I believe 7 still standing eh?
Click to expand...

So the building collapsed then the charges to make it collapse went off? I see a problem here.
 
superlogicalthinker said:
Nope, nice try, read again, I said nothing of the sort. But, it COULD have been taken out to make sure the building fell smooth and straight, with out stopping and tipping over.
Click to expand...

Why not tip it over and maximize the damage?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom