The Gravy Debunks Robert Steele Thread

[Dazed]

Well, it seems to me like US is shoving this steele guy in Gravy's face and saying "how can you believe 911 wasn't a conspiracy when this ex-cia time magazine columnist says it was?"

Now, I could just say, "This guy is not an engineer, he wasn't in the towers, he doesn't have any evidence, he thinks its a conspiracy because of some website, just like everybody else."

But he seemed to want to hear it from gravy.

 

[Gravy]

Gravy you're out of order on this. I've just looked at the threads you have started and there are a lot just like this. One is even just a request by you to get a poster ignored!

Hello? He started two threads directed to me after I had told him that I would not be responding to him. I know you read that thread.

 

[Usual Suspect]

I admit I was wrong and should have handle this differently with Gravy but he just totally skipped over it and Bartmer which angered me and said to me..... and maybe I'm wrong but it said can't debunk. Honestly I believe Gravy can shred the Bartmer thing. I don't think Steele is that easy. Either way , he shreds them both and I will admit I was totally wrong. But to just ignore them especially in the childish way he did yet he calls me the child, well that just say he concedes he can't debunk them and I was right. See you back here tomorrow.

 

[Pardalis]

Screen shot!

 

[Usual Suspect]

Hello? He started two threads directed to me after I had told him that I would not be responding to him. I know you read that thread.

You won't be responding or can't respond?? cause I take won't as can't. No shame in conceding now.

 

[gumboot]

Wow.

Steele is an idiot. There's nothing to debunk. I mean, he thinks GOOGLE is in on the conspiracy! Where the heck does that leave the CTers? How on EARTH are they going to research ANYTHING?

-Gumboot

 

[Usual Suspect]

Screen shot!

Take a screenshot. I said it. He debunks it. I say Gravy you were right and I was wrong. I took screenshots of how he first handle the threads so knock yourself out.

 

[chacal]

Much like Craig Bartmer it wasn't fair of me to put out Robert Steele and think Gravy would be ready to debunk him in minutes. So just as with Bartmer I will start this thread. I only posted 3 links on Steele and will post the same 3 here however Gravy knows there's more to debunk. I will apologize again for calling Gravy a Straw Man since I didn't give him anytime to get info together to debunk Steele. Gravy asked me to answer some questions which I did. You can ask Russ Pickering and JessicaRabbit about that. So now I ask Gravy to debunk Robert Steele. I will start checking back tomorrow as I wait for Gravy to debunk Steele

Steele 1

This first link goes to an infowars.com article by Paul Watson - Are you really expecting someone to take him serously on anything?

Steele 2

In this article in the first paragraph Steele writes:

Armed with new concepts, money, and suicidal pilots, Osama bin Laden has cost us at least $20 billion in damages.

Then he goes on to explain what he thinks is wrong with the US intelligence gathering methods. What's your point.

Steele 3

Gravy knows he can search for more to debunk. Tomorrow I will start checking in once a day as I wait for Gravy to debunk Steele.

In your third link there is a Wikipedia article on Robert David Steele... and?

So unless you expect Gravy to debunk he's very existance I don't see what you are after.

ETA: Now I see you didn't have a point.

 

[Pardalis]

Wow.

Steele is an idiot. There's nothing to debunk. I mean, he thinks GOOGLE is in on the conspiracy! Where the heck does that leave the CTers? How on EARTH are they going to research ANYTHING?

-Gumboot

Actually, you're right. If Google is in on it, then the entire Truth movement research is discredited.

WOW!

 

[DanKirby]

Wow.

Steele is an idiot. There's nothing to debunk. I mean, he thinks GOOGLE is in on the conspiracy! Where the heck does that leave the CTers? How on EARTH are they going to research ANYTHING?

-Gumboot

I've always heard jokes about Google trying to take over the world. Who knew that they were true?

 

[gumboot]

Actually, you're right. If Google is in on it, then the entire Truth movement research is discredited.

WOW!

This is comedy gold.

-Gumboot

 

[Dazed]

Wow.

Steele is an idiot. There's nothing to debunk. I mean, he thinks GOOGLE is in on the conspiracy! Where the heck does that leave the CTers? How on EARTH are they going to research ANYTHING?

-Gumboot

To be fair, he's ex-CIA. If he says google is in bed with the CIA, what reason do you have to doubt him? I'm just curious of the logic here.

 

[gumboot]

To be fair, he's ex-CIA. If he says google is in bed with the CIA, what reason do you have to doubt him? I'm just curious of the logic here.

I didn't say I doubted it. I just said if Google are gubmint shills the CTers are pretty much screwed.

-Gumboot

 

[Dazed]

I was hoping you were going to give me a good reason to doubt it.

 

[LashL]

I was hoping you were going to give me a good reason to doubt it.

Maybe you can Google up a reason on your own.

Ohhhh...

 

[Panoply_Prefect]

To be fair, he's ex-CIA. If he says google is in bed with the CIA, what reason do you have to doubt him? I'm just curious of the logic here.

Anyone know just why he is ex-CIA? Could someone just post the evidence he is using to back this claim up?

Oh, and posting a "This guy sez something on this link, now you debunk it" is just plain trolling.

Cheers,
SLOB

 

[CptColumbo]

So unless you expect Gravy to debunk he's very existance I don't see what you are after.

He don't think, therefore he ain't.

 

[geni]

For Gravy's convenience, some specific claims from Steele.

"There's no way that building could have come down without controlled demolition."

He presents no evidence of this claim

"You do have the whole issue of the security cameras being disengaged, the bomb sniffing dogs being removed, the family ties with Bush - I mean if you smell a rotten fish there's probably a rotten fish somewhere around."

So aparently he has never spent much time in a chemistry lab.

 

[uk_dave]

So aparently he has never spent much time in a chemistry lab.

That's what I like about this forum!

 

[bonavada]

Dazed, you must have missed my post to you in which I said I wouldn't be responding to this troll.

<snip>We've repeatedly requested him to state specifically what, and why, he found to be important in Steele's writing.

ETA:

i agree. let's have US' take on steeles CT claims first...........
a comprehensive breakdown on steeles CD writings would be a good start. not just a few quickly googled lame links. the demands by US are totally unrealistic and intellectually lazy. he/she should get off his/her arse and start the ball rolling.

BV