• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Grand Illusion

Marquis de Carabas said:
Let's not be hasty. There's an awful lot of 2005 left.
Click to expand...

Of course. But like the monthly "post award" threads in the forum community (or at least how they're supposed to work in theory), I presumed that the nominations could be entered throughout the period (in this case, 2005) and there would be no set number or upper limit of nominations. So unless the rules are different for this prize, it should be all right to nominate him now, n'est pas?
 
Hawk one said:
Of course. But like the monthly "post award" threads in the forum community (or at least how they're supposed to work in theory),[snip]
Click to expand...
Hey!

At least now the award is under new management--I expect it will run on time for a bit...
 
Hawk one said:
I'm moving forward in your waiting list for people to be banned, aren't I? :eek:
Click to expand...
Nah, this stuff doesn't do it. Any more mentions of a hairball in a cereal bowl, though, and they'll never find all the pieces of your corpse.









;)
 
Mercutio said:
Nah, this stuff doesn't do it. Any more mentions of a hairball in a cereal bowl, though, and they'll never find all the pieces of your corpse.
Click to expand...

Meow?
 
It's all relative is it not? The only question is, relative to whom ... or what?
Click to expand...
It's only relative to the only thing that matters, yourself.
 
Mercutio said:
Nah, this stuff doesn't do it. Any more mentions of a hairball in a cereal bowl, though, and they'll never find all the pieces of your corpse.

;)
Click to expand...

But I still don't even know what that is about! I haven't even searched to find the post, because I think it's better to stay ignorant about the subject! And I was not the one who brought it up in that other thread either, I was merely responding to someone who brought it up in a reply to me, telling him I didn't know about it. How is that grounds for a banning? How can you call that justice?!? [/overly melodramatic appeal]
 
Hawk one said:
But I still don't even know what that is about! I haven't even searched to find the post, because I think it's better to stay ignorant about the subject! And I was not the one who brought it up in that other thread either, I was merely responding to someone who brought it up in a reply to me, telling him I didn't know about it. How is that grounds for a banning? How can you call that justice?!? [/overly melodramatic appeal]
Click to expand...
I will not link it for you, because even thinking of it plays havoc with my gag reflex. I am thinking of going with my standard defense mechanism, though, and blaming Manfred.
 
Hawk one said:
But I still don't even know what that is about! I haven't even searched to find the post, because I think it's better to stay ignorant about the subject! And I was not the one who brought it up in that other thread either, I was merely responding to someone who brought it up in a reply to me, telling him I didn't know about it. How is that grounds for a banning? How can you call that justice?!? [/overly melodramatic appeal]
Click to expand...


I ain't scared of him.
 
Kiless said:
%$%@#%$@^&%(^%()$$%#@%$$&*^%$^$#@!!

:p
Click to expand...
No, you see, it is the job of Iacchus to avoid answering questions. The rest of us have a tacit agreement to actually answer questions, no matter how silly.



Do I really need to ask twice? Kiless?
 
Mercutio said:
No, you see, it is the job of Iacchus to avoid answering questions. The rest of us have a tacit agreement to actually answer questions, no matter how silly.



Do I really need to ask twice? Kiless?
Click to expand...

It's K I L E S S.

And evidence, m'dear duckie:
me5my.jpg



(Har har! Didn't notice that, did you!)
 
Umm.... what? How on earth does not believing in something after death mean that, when we die, that something absolutely has to be there? How does this "illusion" work? Is Iacchus making the idiotic argument that without something beyond death, we can't imagine life now?
Honestly, just because Lifegazer failed in his efforts to be banned, doesn't mean you have to take up the stupid-slack on his behalf!
 
P.S.A. said:
Umm.... what? How on earth does not believing in something after death mean that, when we die, that something absolutely has to be there? How does this "illusion" work? Is Iacchus making the idiotic argument that without something beyond death, we can't imagine life now?
Click to expand...
Well, let's just say, at the very least, you are a figment of your own imagination. ;)

Honestly, just because Lifegazer failed in his efforts to be banned, doesn't mean you have to take up the stupid-slack on his behalf!
Click to expand...
No, I'm afraid this is your fantasy, not mine.
 
Iacchus said:
Well, let's just say, at the very least, you are a figment of your own imagination. ;)

No, I'm afraid this is your fantasy, not mine.
Click to expand...
Oh, just to add to the masturbatory foray here, what are you and I doing reflecting on a reality which is entirely meaningless? It was meaningless before we arrived, and it's meaningless after we leave. So, why should we find the "hot dog" between two empty buns? :D Yet here we are, ha! ... alive and living a big fat lie!

I prefer Ball Park Franks myself. Yep, "They're plump when you cook em' ..." :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom