• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

"The Global Goals" - The Elites' Blueprint For A "United World"

therival58

Muse
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
589
"The Global Goals": Elites' Blueprint for a "United World" or Utopian fantasy?

Hmm, this is interesting. Is this the totalitarian global agenda finally announcing itself, or another overly ambitious utopian fantasy UN campaign?

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...ed-global-goals-elites-blueprint-united-world

Have you heard of “the global goals”? If you haven’t heard of them by now, rest assured that you will be hearing plenty about them in the days ahead. On September 25th, the United Nations launched a set of 17 ambitious goals that it plans to achieve over the next 15 years. A new website to promote this plan has been established, and you can find it right here. The formal name of this new plan is “the 2030 Agenda“, but those behind it decided that they needed something catchier when promoting these ideas to the general population. The UN has stated that these new “global goals” represent a “new universal Agenda” for humanity. Virtually every nation on the planet has willingly signed on to this new agenda, and you are expected to participate whether you like it or not.

Some of the biggest stars in the entire world have been recruited to promote “the global goals”. Just check out the YouTube video that I have posted below. This is the kind of thing that you would expect from a hardcore religious cult…
....
AP said:
Pope Francis traveled to New York to give the address that kicked off the conference where this new agenda was unveiled…

Pope Francis gave his backing to the new development agenda in an address to the U.N. General Assembly before the summit to adopt the 17-point plan opened, calling it “an important sign of hope” at a very troubled time in the Middle East and Africa.

When Danish Prime Minister Lars Rasmussen struck his gavel to approve the development road map, leaders and diplomats from the 193 U.N. member states stood and applauded loudly.

Then, the summit immediately turned to the real business of the three-day meeting — implementation of the goals, which is expected to cost $3.5 trillion to $5 trillion every year until 2030.
..so where will the trillions of dollars that are needed to implement these new “global goals” come from?

Let me give you a hint – they are not going to come from the poor nations.

When you read over these “global goals”, many of them sound quite good. After all, who wouldn’t want to “end hunger”? I know that I would like to “end hunger” if I could.

The key is to look behind the language and understand what is really being said. And what is really being said is that the elite want to take their dream of a one world system to the next level.

The following list comes from Truthstream Media, and I think that it does a very good job of translating these new “global goals” into language that we can all understand…

Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency in a cashless society

Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Translation: GMO

Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Translation: Mass vaccination, Codex Alimentarius

Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Translation: UN propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave

Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Translation: Population control through forced “Family Planning”

Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride

Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing

Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Translation: TPP, free trade zones that favor megacorporate interests

Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions

Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus

Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state

Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Translation: Forced austerity

Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes

Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors

Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights

Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Translation: UN “peacekeeping” missions (ex 1, ex 2), the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more “UN peacekeeping” when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA

Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the “authority” and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the UN

If you doubt any of this, you can find the official document for this new UN agenda right here. The more you dig into the details, the more you realize just how insidious these “global goals” really are.

The elite want a one world government, a one world economic system and a one world religion. But they are not going to achieve these things by conquest. Rather, they want everyone to sign up for these new systems willingly.

The “global goals” are a template for a united world. To many, the “utopia” that the elite are promising sounds quite promising. But for those that know what time it is, this call for a “united world” is very, very chilling.

It sounds overly ambitious. Ending both poverty and hunger in 15 years? Really? How will this be accomplished?

Here is a cute and cuddly animation being implemented across cinemas everywhere to spread awareness of the "goals":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2NHqJK7r2c
http://www.adweek.com/news/advertis...un-campaign-aims-be-every-cinema-world-167115
 
Last edited:
Gender equality, and end to poverty, and sustainable industry?

They have my support.
 
Gender equality, and end to poverty, and sustainable industry?

They have my support.

Another critical thinker. Haven't we already tried a failed "war on poverty"?

Why don't you look into how they are going to "end poverty" ?
 
It sounds overly ambitious. Ending both poverty and hunger in 15 years? Really? How will this be accomplished?

They set a goal reducing people living in extreme poverty by half between 1990 and 2015, and it was accomplished ahead of schedule despite population growth. It doesn't get much press, probably because it was done the wrong way (through globalization, not humanitarian aid or other UN actions), but it did happen.

Would you have preferred non-ambitious, easy goals?
 
The following list comes from Truthstream Media, and I think that it does a very good job of translating these new “global goals” into language that we can all understand…
By 'translating', it seems you mean 'changing something good into something bad without any evidence this is true'- or did I miss the part where you show how any of the long list following is real and not yet another paranoid fantasy?
 
Even if we accept in whole or part the idiotic "Translations", this looks like a policy/direction that is mostly positive. Unless, of course, you are afraid of the monsters under your bed.
 
After all, no one should ever try to make anything better, some of those less deserving people might get something I don't think they should have.
 
They set a goal reducing people living in extreme poverty by half between 1990 and 2015, and it was accomplished ahead of schedule despite population growth. It doesn't get much press, probably because it was done the wrong way (through globalization, not humanitarian aid or other UN actions), but it did happen.

Would you have preferred non-ambitious, easy goals?

Isn't there a middle ground? How about "reduce poverty/hunger rate by X% by 20XX through X,Y,Z programs"? Specific, measurable, and less utopian.
 
Isn't there a middle ground? How about "reduce poverty/hunger rate by X% by 20XX through X,Y,Z programs"? Specific, measurable, and less utopian.
Something like this?

Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day

1.2 By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions
 
Another critical thinker. Haven't we already tried a failed "war on poverty"?

No. We have reduced poverty, and raised quality of life, far further than any reasonable expectation.

Why don't you look into how they are going to "end poverty" ?

I have. And I note two things:
1) They do not describe anything close to your "translation."
2) The "translation" would be a policy I support. A universal currency, that bolsters bodies that could act as a stabilising influence, to and help prevent individual nations from entering economic freefall? Yes. I like that. I like GMO being used to end famine and grow nutritious crops in barren lands too. But that is not the full, or concise translation of the policy. It is the scareword you call a translation based on, at best, a limited understanding of the policies.

The New World Order keep impressing me. I really should sign up.
 
Isn't there a middle ground? How about "reduce poverty/hunger rate by X% by 20XX through X,Y,Z programs"? Specific, measurable, and less utopian.

Why would you WANT a middle ground?
Who sits there and thinks "I would be much happier if we weren't helping everybody out of poverty"?

By the way, THAT is a far more worryingly eugenic thing to suggest. We should only reduce poverty by a percentage, means you are selecting people to remain in poverty. You are selecting people to not help.

Aim high, and if you don't make it, who cares. You aimed for something worth going for.
 
Hmm, this is interesting. Is this the totalitarian global agenda finally announcing itself, or another overly ambitious utopian fantasy UN campaign?

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-...ed-global-goals-elites-blueprint-united-world



It sounds overly ambitious. Ending both poverty and hunger in 15 years? Really? How will this be accomplished?

Here is a cute and cuddly animation being implemented across cinemas everywhere to spread awareness of the "goals":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2NHqJK7r2c
http://www.adweek.com/news/advertis...un-campaign-aims-be-every-cinema-world-167115

You are quoting a website that is so irrational that it interprets...
16.4 By 2030, significantly reduce illicit financial and arms flows, strengthen the recovery and return of stolen assets and combat all forms of organized crime​
...as repealing the Second Amendment from the U.S. Consititution.

Citing hysterical people is not conducive to a rational discussion.

.........
Some of the goals are achievable, some of the goals are ambitious. There is nothing wrong with setting goals and working toward them. To me, the list with sub-points on the UN website seems to be the appropriate level of detail for a high-level description of a 15-year plan that will require efforts by hundreds of independent entities.
 
Last edited:
Isn't there a middle ground? How about "reduce poverty/hunger rate by X% by 20XX through X,Y,Z programs"? Specific, measurable, and less utopian.

This looks like the worst of both worlds. Make the goals less ambitious, so the real work of the UN is less effective. Plus, keep the word "programs", or even (Shock! Horror!) "agenda", thus still allowing the kind of nonsensical re-interpreting of the fear-mongers.
I'll stay with the original, thanks.
 
Why does the OP post incessant nonsense, before disappearing for a time only to return to (you guessed it) post more nonsense? Do you ever go back to take a gander at some of your paranoid bollocks and think "gee, how wrong was I"?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom